• Convert HDD to SSD

    From CtrlAltDel@Altie@BHam.com to alt.os.linux on Mon May 5 10:21:46 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    Hello everyone. I have several old spinner hard drives that I no longer
    use and would like to know if there are any apps I can use to convert them
    to SSD's?

    Turning them into regular SSD's would be great, but I would prefer them to become NVMe solid state drives, if possible.
    --- Synchronet 3.20c-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kerr-Mudd, John@admin@127.0.0.1 to alt.os.linux on Mon May 5 11:42:19 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Mon, 5 May 2025 10:21:46 -0000 (UTC)
    CtrlAltDel <Altie@BHam.com> wrote:

    Hello everyone. I have several old spinner hard drives that I no longer
    use and would like to know if there are any apps I can use to convert them to SSD's?

    Turning them into regular SSD's would be great, but I would prefer them to become NVMe solid state drives, if possible.

    LOL

    FWSE "RAID 5 Floppy Drive"
    --
    Bah, and indeed Humbug.
    --- Synchronet 3.20c-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Carlos E.R.@robin_listas@es.invalid to alt.os.linux on Mon May 5 13:06:16 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 2025-05-05 12:21, CtrlAltDel wrote:
    Hello everyone. I have several old spinner hard drives that I no longer
    use and would like to know if there are any apps I can use to convert them
    to SSD's?

    Turning them into regular SSD's would be great, but I would prefer them to become NVMe solid state drives, if possible.

    What do you mean, convert? You have to replace them. Do it one at a
    time, create the partitions you wish, format, and copy the files with rsync.

    nothing to it.
    --
    Cheers, Carlos.
    --- Synchronet 3.20c-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Daniel70@daniel47@eternal-september.org to alt.os.linux on Mon May 5 22:54:02 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 5/05/2025 8:21 pm, CtrlAltDel wrote:
    Hello everyone. I have several old spinner hard drives that I no longer
    use and would like to know if there are any apps I can use to convert them
    to SSD's?

    Turning them into regular SSD's would be great, but I would prefer them to become NVMe solid state drives, if possible.

    I would have thought the clue was in the names .... "spinner hard drive"
    (i.e. rotating disks) and "solid state drive" (i.e. no rotating disk).

    Unless, of course, you are talking about removing the spinning disk
    block and replacing it was a SSD block ..... which *MIGHT* be possible
    .... but I seriously doubt the Economics would work out!!
    --
    Daniel70
    --- Synchronet 3.20c-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From J.O. Aho@user@example.net to alt.os.linux on Mon May 5 15:12:53 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 05/05/2025 12.21, CtrlAltDel wrote:
    Hello everyone. I have several old spinner hard drives that I no longer
    use and would like to know if there are any apps I can use to convert them
    to SSD's?

    Turning them into regular SSD's would be great, but I would prefer them to become NVMe solid state drives, if possible.

    1. Check your motherboard if it supports M2 or if it only has SATA
    2. Buy a SSD/NVMe of a size big enough to contain the content of the HDD
    3. Use dd to clone the largest HDD to the SSD/NVMe
    4. Use parted or fdisk to get the sizes of the partitions of the next HDD
    5. Use parted/fdisk to add new partitions of the right size to the SSD/NVMe
    6. Use dd to clone each partition from the HDD to the new partitions on
    the SSD/NVMe
    7. jump back to point 4 and repeat the steps for the next HDD.
    8. When no more HDD left, you are finished.

    Example:
    dd bs=4M conv=sync,noerror status=progress if=/dev/hdd-partition of=/dev/nvme-ssd-partition

    store away your HDDs, keep them as backup.
    --
    //Aho
    --- Synchronet 3.20c-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul@nospam@needed.invalid to alt.os.linux on Mon May 5 11:09:31 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Mon, 5/5/2025 6:21 AM, CtrlAltDel wrote:
    Hello everyone. I have several old spinner hard drives that I no longer
    use and would like to know if there are any apps I can use to convert them to SSD's?

    Turning them into regular SSD's would be great, but I would prefer them to become NVMe solid state drives, if possible.


    SSD drives can be pretty cheap.

    https://www.newegg.com/lexar-128gb-ns100/p/0D9-003V-00054

    1TB $66.97 USD
    512GB $40.99 USD
    256GB $28.99 USD <=== my computer store has these, for a little less ["scratch drives"]
    128GB $28.41 USD

    Paul
    --- Synchronet 3.20c-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Carlos E.R.@robin_listas@es.invalid to alt.os.linux on Mon May 5 22:47:42 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 2025-05-05 15:12, J.O. Aho wrote:
    On 05/05/2025 12.21, CtrlAltDel wrote:
    Hello everyone. I have several old spinner hard drives that I no longer
    use and would like to know if there are any apps I can use to convert
    them
    to SSD's?

    Turning them into regular SSD's would be great, but I would prefer
    them to
    become NVMe solid state drives, if possible.

    1. Check your motherboard if it supports M2 or if it only has SATA
    2. Buy a SSD/NVMe of a size big enough to contain the content of the HDD
    3. Use dd to clone the largest HDD to the SSD/NVMe
    4. Use parted or fdisk to get the sizes of the partitions of the next HDD
    5. Use parted/fdisk to add new partitions of the right size to the SSD/NVMe 6. Use dd to clone each partition from the HDD to the new partitions on
    the SSD/NVMe
    7. jump back to point 4 and repeat the steps for the next HDD.
    8. When no more HDD left, you are finished.

    Example:
    dd bs=4M conv=sync,noerror status=progress if=/dev/hdd-partition of=/ dev/nvme-ssd-partition

    Caveat: the logical block size has to be the same.


    store away your HDDs, keep them as backup.

    --
    Cheers, Carlos.
    --- Synchronet 3.20c-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@ldo@nz.invalid to alt.os.linux on Mon May 5 22:32:58 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Mon, 5 May 2025 15:12:53 +0200, J.O. Aho wrote:

    1. Check your motherboard if it supports M2 or if it only has SATA 2.

    M.2 is a physical interface. You can have M.2 connectors that do SATA, and
    you can have ones that do NVME.
    --- Synchronet 3.20c-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Robert@monstoor@spammedia.com to alt.os.linux on Tue May 6 00:11:02 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 05/05/2025 12:06, Carlos E.R. wrote:

    What do you mean, convert? You have to replace them. Do it one at a
    time, create the partitions you wish, format, and copy the files with
    rsync.

    Perhaps the OP is thinking of that 90s software that could increase your
    RAM capacity..?

    Cheers ;-)
    --
    Rob
    "I have never understood why it should be necessary to become irrational
    in order to prove that you care, or, indeed, why it should be necessary
    to prove it at all." - Avon, Blake's 7

    --- Synchronet 3.20c-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CtrlAltDel@Altie@BHam.com to alt.os.linux on Mon May 5 23:33:21 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Mon, 5 May 2025 13:06:16 +0200, Carlos E.R. wrote:

    On 2025-05-05 12:21, CtrlAltDel wrote:
    Hello everyone. I have several old spinner hard drives that I no longer
    use and would like to know if there are any apps I can use to convert
    them to SSD's?

    Turning them into regular SSD's would be great, but I would prefer them
    to become NVMe solid state drives, if possible.

    What do you mean, convert? You have to replace them. Do it one at a
    time, create the partitions you wish, format, and copy the files with
    rsync.

    nothing to it.

    I was wanting to convert the HDD's to actual SDD's, if possible. I hate
    to be wasteful and don't want to just throw the HDD's away. So, I need to actually change the HDD's and made them into SDD's so they will be faster
    and more reliable.

    I don't care about losing any data; I can reformat them.
    --- Synchronet 3.20c-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CtrlAltDel@Altie@BHam.com to alt.os.linux on Mon May 5 23:38:54 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Mon, 5 May 2025 22:54:02 +1000, Daniel70 wrote:


    I would have thought the clue was in the names .... "spinner hard drive" (i.e. rotating disks) and "solid state drive" (i.e. no rotating disk).

    Unless, of course, you are talking about removing the spinning disk
    block and replacing it was a SSD block ..... which *MIGHT* be possible
    .... but I seriously doubt the Economics would work out!!

    Let me explain. I bought a Dell XPS about 12 years ago and it had a TB HDD drive. Since that time, I've added 2 more 1TB HDD's to the box. So,
    that's three perfectly fine HDD's that still work great that I don't want
    to just trash.

    But, I do want to convert them to SDD's so that I can gain a little bit of speed using common programs. In other words, I would prefer not to have to purchase any new product, only convert what I currently have.
    --- Synchronet 3.20c-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CtrlAltDel@Altie@BHam.com to alt.os.linux on Mon May 5 23:40:49 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Mon, 5 May 2025 15:12:53 +0200, J.O. Aho wrote:

    1. Check your motherboard if it supports M2 or if it only has SATA 2.
    7. jump back to point 4 and repeat the steps for the next HDD.
    8. When no more HDD left, you are finished.

    Example:
    dd bs=4M conv=sync,noerror status=progress if=/dev/hdd-partition of=/dev/nvme-ssd-partition

    store away your HDDs, keep them as backup.

    This is great information, thanks. Unfortunately, it's not what I had in
    mind to do.

    --- Synchronet 3.20c-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CtrlAltDel@Altie@BHam.com to alt.os.linux on Mon May 5 23:42:54 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Mon, 5 May 2025 11:09:31 -0400, Paul wrote:

    SSD drives can be pretty cheap.

    https://www.newegg.com/lexar-128gb-ns100/p/0D9-003V-00054

    1TB $66.97 USD 512GB $40.99 USD 256GB $28.99 USD <=== my computer
    store has these, for a little less ["scratch drives"]
    128GB $28.41 USD

    Paul

    Thanks, Paul. It's not a money issue. It's just that I like to recycle things and reuse them. Why throw away something if it still works, right.

    --- Synchronet 3.20c-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Carlos E.R.@robin_listas@es.invalid to alt.os.linux on Tue May 6 02:11:34 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 2025-05-06 01:33, CtrlAltDel wrote:
    On Mon, 5 May 2025 13:06:16 +0200, Carlos E.R. wrote:

    On 2025-05-05 12:21, CtrlAltDel wrote:
    Hello everyone. I have several old spinner hard drives that I no longer
    use and would like to know if there are any apps I can use to convert
    them to SSD's?

    Turning them into regular SSD's would be great, but I would prefer them
    to become NVMe solid state drives, if possible.

    What do you mean, convert? You have to replace them. Do it one at a
    time, create the partitions you wish, format, and copy the files with
    rsync.

    nothing to it.

    I was wanting to convert the HDD's to actual SDD's, if possible.

    Absolutely utterly impossible.

    You might open the metal box of a hard disk, remove all the contents,
    and replace with the contents of the SSD.
    --
    Cheers, Carlos.
    --- Synchronet 3.20c-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul@nospam@needed.invalid to alt.os.linux on Mon May 5 22:31:52 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Mon, 5/5/2025 7:11 PM, Robert wrote:
    On 05/05/2025 12:06, Carlos E.R. wrote:

    What do you mean, convert? You have to replace them. Do it one at a time, create the partitions you wish, format, and copy the files with rsync.

    Perhaps the OP is thinking of that 90s software that could increase your RAM capacity..?

    Cheers ;-)

    Hey, that actually works :-)

    It didn't exactly double RAM, but it was lots of
    fun to play with.

    Connectix RamDoubler for the Mac.

    https://apple.fandom.com/wiki/RAM_Doubler

    And the idea lives on, in W10 and W11 "Memory Compressor" process.

    See, everyone makes fun of it, and when the third parties
    stop doing it, the OS goes ahead and does it.

    Paul

    --- Synchronet 3.20c-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From J.O. Aho@user@example.net to alt.os.linux on Tue May 6 08:16:51 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 06/05/2025 01.38, CtrlAltDel wrote:
    On Mon, 5 May 2025 22:54:02 +1000, Daniel70 wrote:


    I would have thought the clue was in the names .... "spinner hard drive"
    (i.e. rotating disks) and "solid state drive" (i.e. no rotating disk).

    Unless, of course, you are talking about removing the spinning disk
    block and replacing it was a SSD block ..... which *MIGHT* be possible
    .... but I seriously doubt the Economics would work out!!

    Let me explain. I bought a Dell XPS about 12 years ago and it had a TB HDD drive. Since that time, I've added 2 more 1TB HDD's to the box. So,
    that's three perfectly fine HDD's that still work great that I don't want
    to just trash.

    But, I do want to convert them to SDD's so that I can gain a little bit of speed using common programs. In other words, I would prefer not to have to purchase any new product, only convert what I currently have.

    What you are asking to take your bike and convert it to a space shuttle,
    there is just no way to make a HDD to become a SSD, sure they may have
    the same SATA interface but what is after the interface is quite
    different, the HDD uses a magnetic surface that rotates to store data,
    while the SSD uses chips to store it's data on.

    The alternatives you have is to move the data from the HDD to SSD or if
    your old laptop supports two devices, you can buy a smaller SSD and use
    that as a cache for the HDD (this may require you backup the data from
    the HDD and then restore it afterwards), this can be done in quite many different ways

    bcache: https://community.bigbeartechworld.com/t/setting-up-ssd-caching-with-bcache-in-linux-a-complete-guide/2645

    lvmcache: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/lvm-cache-setup-documentation-reza-bojnordi-sn4wf

    This will work like you have data that is frequently used stored on the
    SSD, if you read a file that is less frequently used it will be fetched
    from the HDD, you can also have that you write files first to the SSD,
    which in the background will copy the data to the HDD.
    This will of course not convert your HDD into a SSD, but will make
    things feel a bit faster, you can sometimes get the SSD speed and other
    times the HDD speed, but you need to have two storage devices in your computer.
    This was a popular solution when SSD was expensive and small in storage
    size, there was something called "SHDD", which was one HDD, but on it's controller card it had a really small SSD built in, used in the same way
    as bache/lvmcache, sadly you can't just take a such controller card and
    stuck it on your HDD as most likely the headers may work in a slight
    different way, spin engine may run in a different voltage and speed and
    the number or disks inside may differ too and so on.

    I would just recommend you switch the HDD to a SSD, do a fresh install
    and your laptop will defensively feel faster when loading and saving
    files, but don't expect too much as the SATA standard used by the
    motherboard will set a speed limit.

    The HDD you have, but them in USB-storage enclosures, then you can use
    those as portable disks which works fine for making backups to.
    --
    //Aho
    --- Synchronet 3.20c-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Woozy Song@suzyw0ng@outlook.com to alt.os.linux on Tue May 6 14:32:12 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    CtrlAltDel wrote:
    Hello everyone. I have several old spinner hard drives that I no longer
    use and would like to know if there are any apps I can use to convert them
    to SSD's?

    Turning them into regular SSD's would be great, but I would prefer them to become NVMe solid state drives, if possible.


    Use Clonezilla to copy entire hard drive to an SSD.
    Samsung Evo SATA SSD will be about 3x faster than a consumer spinner.
    I presume your disks aren't more than 7 or 8 TB.
    --- Synchronet 3.20c-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Anssi Saari@anssi.saari@usenet.mail.kapsi.fi to alt.os.linux on Tue May 6 10:26:42 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    CtrlAltDel <Altie@BHam.com> writes:

    But, I do want to convert them to SDD's so that I can gain a little bit of speed using common programs. In other words, I would prefer not to have to purchase any new product, only convert what I currently have.

    I think you'll need to talk to your local alchemist about this
    conversion. I expect they'll be interested and deliver it soon, right
    after they figure out the recipe for turning lead into gold.
    --- Synchronet 3.20c-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kerr-Mudd, John@admin@127.0.0.1 to alt.os.linux on Tue May 6 08:51:58 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Tue, 06 May 2025 10:26:42 +0300
    Anssi Saari <anssi.saari@usenet.mail.kapsi.fi> wrote:

    CtrlAltDel <Altie@BHam.com> writes:

    But, I do want to convert them to SDD's so that I can gain a little bit of speed using common programs. In other words, I would prefer not to have to purchase any new product, only convert what I currently have.

    I think you'll need to talk to your local alchemist about this
    conversion. I expect they'll be interested and deliver it soon, right
    after they figure out the recipe for turning lead into gold.

    Yup, sadly changing Iron into Silicon isn't top priorty for them.
    --
    Bah, and indeed Humbug.
    --- Synchronet 3.20c-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dan Purgert@dan@djph.net to alt.os.linux on Tue May 6 10:51:30 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 2025-05-05, CtrlAltDel wrote:
    On Mon, 5 May 2025 13:06:16 +0200, Carlos E.R. wrote:

    On 2025-05-05 12:21, CtrlAltDel wrote:
    Hello everyone. I have several old spinner hard drives that I no longer
    use and would like to know if there are any apps I can use to convert
    them to SSD's?

    Turning them into regular SSD's would be great, but I would prefer them
    to become NVMe solid state drives, if possible.

    What do you mean, convert? You have to replace them. Do it one at a
    time, create the partitions you wish, format, and copy the files with
    rsync.

    nothing to it.

    I was wanting to convert the HDD's to actual SDD's, if possible. I hate
    to be wasteful and don't want to just throw the HDD's away. So, I
    need to actually change the HDD's and made them into SDD's so they
    will be faster and more reliable.

    It's as possible as "converting" a Boeing 777 to a daily driver you keep
    in your house's attached garage.
    --
    |_|O|_|
    |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert
    |O|O|O| PGP: DDAB 23FB 19FA 7D85 1CC1 E067 6D65 70E5 4CE7 2860
    --- Synchronet 3.20c-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul@nospam@needed.invalid to alt.os.linux on Tue May 6 15:18:36 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Tue, 5/6/2025 6:51 AM, Dan Purgert wrote:
    On 2025-05-05, CtrlAltDel wrote:
    On Mon, 5 May 2025 13:06:16 +0200, Carlos E.R. wrote:

    On 2025-05-05 12:21, CtrlAltDel wrote:
    Hello everyone. I have several old spinner hard drives that I no longer >>>> use and would like to know if there are any apps I can use to convert
    them to SSD's?

    Turning them into regular SSD's would be great, but I would prefer them >>>> to become NVMe solid state drives, if possible.

    What do you mean, convert? You have to replace them. Do it one at a
    time, create the partitions you wish, format, and copy the files with
    rsync.

    nothing to it.

    I was wanting to convert the HDD's to actual SDD's, if possible. I hate
    to be wasteful and don't want to just throw the HDD's away. So, I
    need to actually change the HDD's and made them into SDD's so they
    will be faster and more reliable.

    It's as possible as "converting" a Boeing 777 to a daily driver you keep
    in your house's attached garage.


    You could make a RAID 0 out of the three 1TB drives.
    But the results won't feel all that "special".

    The software stack on computers, is still a major impediment
    to a good time. Would I buy a PCIe Rev5 NVMe ? No, because
    the OS would not make good usage of it. It would only look
    good while doing benchmarks.

    Paul
    --- Synchronet 3.20c-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jimmy Anderson@jimmy.anderson@palantirbbs.ddns.net.remove-2iv-this to Carlos E.R. on Tue May 6 19:43:36 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    To: Carlos E.R.
    Carlos E.R. wrote to alt.os.linux <=-


    I was wanting to convert the HDD's to actual SDD's, if possible.

    Absolutely utterly impossible.

    You might open the metal box of a hard disk, remove all the contents,
    and replace with the contents of the SSD.

    I appreciate the thought he has about saving stuff, but converting to
    CONTENTS of an SSD would also destroy to HDD's, right? So they are
    still not being saved...

    I'm sure someone could use them. :-)



    ... Hookd on foniks wurkd for mee!
    --- MultiMail/Mac v0.52
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
    Palantir BBS - telnet://palantirbbs.ddns.net
    --- Synchronet 3.20c-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From evanmac@ciccio@formaggio.org to alt.os.linux on Fri May 9 17:59:41 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    con fecha5 May 2025 y hora 11:21:46 GMT+1, "CtrlAltDel" <Altie@BHam.com> sacó de su cabeza:

    if there are any apps I can use to convert them to SSD's?

    app is *SOFTware*, while HDD/SSD are *HARDware*

    Beyond that, you'd like to "convert" a fish into a bird (via software), seems it possible to you?
    --
    this is a random signature
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Brian Gregory@void-invalid-dead-dontuse@email.invalid to alt.os.linux on Sat May 10 21:27:54 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 06/05/2025 00:38, CtrlAltDel wrote:
    Let me explain. I bought a Dell XPS about 12 years ago and it had a TB HDD drive. Since that time, I've added 2 more 1TB HDD's to the box. So,
    that's three perfectly fine HDD's that still work great that I don't want
    to just trash.

    But, I do want to convert them to SDD's so that I can gain a little bit of speed using common programs. In other words, I would prefer not to have to purchase any new product, only convert what I currently have.

    You might be able to replace them with SSDs.

    You could probably also copy the contents of the HDDs on to the new SSDs
    that you are going to put in instead.

    But convert them into SSDs? I'm finding it hard to imagine what you are thinking of in this case.
    --
    Brian Gregory (in England).
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul@nospam@needed.invalid to alt.os.linux on Sat May 10 21:54:09 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Sat, 5/10/2025 4:27 PM, Brian Gregory wrote:
    On 06/05/2025 00:38, CtrlAltDel wrote:
    Let me explain. I bought a Dell XPS about 12 years ago and it had a TB HDD >> drive.  Since that time, I've added 2 more 1TB HDD's to the box.  So,
    that's three perfectly fine HDD's that still work great that I don't want
    to just trash.

    But, I do want to convert them to SDD's so that I can gain a little bit of >> speed using common programs. In other words, I would prefer not to have to >> purchase any new product, only convert what I currently have.

    You might be able to replace them with SSDs.

    You could probably also copy the contents of the HDDs on to the new SSDs that you are going to put in instead.

    But convert them into SSDs? I'm finding it hard to imagine what you are thinking of in this case.


    You can make a RAID0 array of an arbitrary number of HDD
    to make a higher sequential speed. But this is mostly for
    making pretty benchmarks, and is not particularly practical.

    Paul

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CtrlAltDel@Altie@BHam.com to alt.os.linux on Mon May 12 22:22:20 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Fri, 9 May 2025 17:59:41 -0000 (UTC), evanmac wrote:

    con fecha5 May 2025 y hora 11:21:46 GMT+1, "CtrlAltDel" <Altie@BHam.com> sacó de su cabeza:

    if there are any apps I can use to convert them to SSD's?

    app is *SOFTware*, while HDD/SSD are *HARDware*

    Beyond that, you'd like to "convert" a fish into a bird (via software),
    seems it possible to you?

    Well, I'm using Linux Mint 22.1 if that helps any. I know you probably couldn't do anything like this on Windows but, I am using Linux.

    I mean, I already have these HDD's, why not re-purpose them and give them another function as SSD's. I've been researching it and they say solid
    state drives give you faster boot times, less power consumption, faster read/write speeds, etc...

    Why in the world wouldn't I want to take what I have and upgrade them into more powerful and useful drives? I know how to solder and if I need to
    buy a few parts, as long as they are very inexpensive, I can do that.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CtrlAltDel@Altie@BHam.com to alt.os.linux on Mon May 12 22:25:51 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Tue, 6 May 2025 14:32:12 +0800, Woozy Song wrote:

    CtrlAltDel wrote:
    Hello everyone. I have several old spinner hard drives that I no longer
    use and would like to know if there are any apps I can use to convert
    them to SSD's?

    Turning them into regular SSD's would be great, but I would prefer them
    to become NVMe solid state drives, if possible.


    Use Clonezilla to copy entire hard drive to an SSD.
    Samsung Evo SATA SSD will be about 3x faster than a consumer spinner.
    I presume your disks aren't more than 7 or 8 TB.

    I've heard of Clonezilla; this is probably what I need. I'll download it
    and see if I can make it work for me. This going to be great if it works right.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CtrlAltDel@Altie@BHam.com to alt.os.linux on Mon May 12 22:28:42 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Mon, 5 May 2025 11:09:31 -0400, Paul wrote:

    SSD drives can be pretty cheap.

    https://www.newegg.com/lexar-128gb-ns100/p/0D9-003V-00054

    1TB $66.97 USD 512GB $40.99 USD 256GB $28.99 USD <=== my computer
    store has these, for a little less ["scratch drives"]
    128GB $28.41 USD


    Are these prices for HDD's that have been previously converted into SSD's
    or just SSD's originally?

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dan Purgert@dan@djph.net to alt.os.linux on Tue May 13 00:11:26 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 2025-05-12, CtrlAltDel wrote:
    On Mon, 5 May 2025 11:09:31 -0400, Paul wrote:

    SSD drives can be pretty cheap.

    https://www.newegg.com/lexar-128gb-ns100/p/0D9-003V-00054

    1TB $66.97 USD 512GB $40.99 USD 256GB $28.99 USD <=== my computer
    store has these, for a little less ["scratch drives"]
    128GB $28.41 USD


    Are these prices for HDD's that have been previously converted into SSD's
    or just SSD's originally?

    There is not, nor has there ever been, a HDD that has been "converted"
    into an SSD in the manner which you want to do.

    It's simply not how this stuff works, at all.
    --
    |_|O|_|
    |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert
    |O|O|O| PGP: DDAB 23FB 19FA 7D85 1CC1 E067 6D65 70E5 4CE7 2860
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Carlos E.R.@robin_listas@es.invalid to alt.os.linux on Tue May 13 02:43:18 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 2025-05-13 00:22, CtrlAltDel wrote:
    On Fri, 9 May 2025 17:59:41 -0000 (UTC), evanmac wrote:

    con fecha5 May 2025 y hora 11:21:46 GMT+1, "CtrlAltDel" <Altie@BHam.com>
    sacó de su cabeza:

    if there are any apps I can use to convert them to SSD's?

    app is *SOFTware*, while HDD/SSD are *HARDware*

    Beyond that, you'd like to "convert" a fish into a bird (via software),
    seems it possible to you?

    Well, I'm using Linux Mint 22.1 if that helps any. I know you probably couldn't do anything like this on Windows but, I am using Linux.

    I mean, I already have these HDD's, why not re-purpose them and give them another function as SSD's. I've been researching it and they say solid
    state drives give you faster boot times, less power consumption, faster read/write speeds, etc...

    Why in the world wouldn't I want to take what I have and upgrade them into more powerful and useful drives? I know how to solder and if I need to
    buy a few parts, as long as they are very inexpensive, I can do that.

    What the fuck are you talking about?

    We told you, it is impossible to convert a hard disk into an SSD, or the reverse.
    --
    Cheers, Carlos.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John Hasler@john@sugarbit.com to alt.os.linux on Mon May 12 22:38:32 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    CtrlAltDel writes:
    Why in the world wouldn't I want to take what I have and upgrade them
    into more powerful and useful drives? I know how to solder and if I
    need to buy a few parts, as long as they are very inexpensive, I can
    do that.

    You[1] *could* open up an HDD, throw away the guts, and install a circuit board with all the ICs that comprise an SDD. It would be a lot of work
    and the cost of the parts would exceed the cost of an SSD.

    [1] I could, but I wouldn't. I rather doubt that you have the
    necessary skills.
    --
    John Hasler
    john@sugarbit.com
    Dancing Horse Hill
    Elmwood, WI USA
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Gamgee@gamgee@palantirbbs.ddns.net.remove-d03-this to CtrlAltDel on Mon May 12 21:33:47 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    To: CtrlAltDel
    CtrlAltDel wrote to alt.os.linux <=-

    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Fri, 9 May 2025 17:59:41 -0000 (UTC), evanmac wrote:

    con fecha5 May 2025 y hora 11:21:46 GMT+1, "CtrlAltDel" <Altie@BHam.com> sac|| de su cabeza:

    if there are any apps I can use to convert them to SSD's?

    app is *SOFTware*, while HDD/SSD are *HARDware*

    Beyond that, you'd like to "convert" a fish into a bird (via software), seems it possible to you?

    Well, I'm using Linux Mint 22.1 if that helps any. I know you probably couldn't do anything like this on Windows but, I am using Linux.

    I mean, I already have these HDD's, why not re-purpose them and give
    them another function as SSD's. I've been researching it and they say solid state drives give you faster boot times, less power consumption, faster read/write speeds, etc...

    Why in the world wouldn't I want to take what I have and upgrade them
    into more powerful and useful drives? I know how to solder and if I
    need to buy a few parts, as long as they are very inexpensive, I can do that. --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

    Might be time to put the crack pipe down for a bit.

    You can't do what you're babbling about.



    ... Ignorance can be cured. Stupid is forever.
    --- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
    Palantir BBS - telnet://palantirbbs.ddns.net
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CtrlAltDel@Altie@BHam.com to alt.os.linux on Tue May 13 05:30:43 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Mon, 12 May 2025 22:38:32 -0500, John Hasler wrote:

    CtrlAltDel writes:
    Why in the world wouldn't I want to take what I have and upgrade them
    into more powerful and useful drives? I know how to solder and if I
    need to buy a few parts, as long as they are very inexpensive, I can do
    that.

    You[1] *could* open up an HDD, throw away the guts, and install a
    circuit board with all the ICs that comprise an SDD. It would be a lot
    of work and the cost of the parts would exceed the cost of an SSD.

    [1] I could, but I wouldn't. I rather doubt that you have the
    necessary skills.

    This is almost what I want to do, with the exception of throwing away the
    guts of the perfectly functioning HDD. Finally, someone is listening to
    what I am actually saying.

    Since you have the skill level necessary to do this, maybe you could tell
    me how to do it. How smart does one have to be to do it?
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CtrlAltDel@Altie@BHam.com to alt.os.linux on Tue May 13 05:32:43 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Tue, 13 May 2025 02:43:18 +0200, Carlos E.R. wrote:

    What the fuck are you talking about?

    We told you, it is impossible to convert a hard disk into an SSD, or the reverse.


    You aren't being very helpful. The poster named John Hasler is being much more gracious than you and seems to know how to do what I am requesting.

    Thanks, anyway.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CtrlAltDel@Altie@BHam.com to alt.os.linux on Tue May 13 05:36:23 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Mon, 12 May 2025 21:33:47 -0500, Gamgee wrote:


    Might be time to put the crack pipe down for a bit.

    You can't do what you're babbling about.

    Completely unnecessary insinuation; I don't do any types of drugs. If you don't have a valid answer, why respond at all?
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From J.O. Aho@user@example.net to alt.os.linux on Tue May 13 09:29:08 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 13/05/2025 00.25, CtrlAltDel wrote:
    On Tue, 6 May 2025 14:32:12 +0800, Woozy Song wrote:

    CtrlAltDel wrote:
    Hello everyone. I have several old spinner hard drives that I no longer
    use and would like to know if there are any apps I can use to convert
    them to SSD's?

    Turning them into regular SSD's would be great, but I would prefer them
    to become NVMe solid state drives, if possible.


    Use Clonezilla to copy entire hard drive to an SSD.
    Samsung Evo SATA SSD will be about 3x faster than a consumer spinner.
    I presume your disks aren't more than 7 or 8 TB.

    I've heard of Clonezilla; this is probably what I need. I'll download it
    and see if I can make it work for me. This going to be great if it works right.

    Clonezilla does the same as dd, make a clone of one device to another,
    so it will require you to buy SSD and then copy the content from a HDD
    to your new SSD.

    Clonezilla will not magically make your HDD to be transformed into a SSD device.
    --
    //Aho
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From J.O. Aho@user@example.net to alt.os.linux on Tue May 13 09:42:17 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 13/05/2025 07.30, CtrlAltDel wrote:
    On Mon, 12 May 2025 22:38:32 -0500, John Hasler wrote:

    CtrlAltDel writes:
    Why in the world wouldn't I want to take what I have and upgrade them
    into more powerful and useful drives? I know how to solder and if I
    need to buy a few parts, as long as they are very inexpensive, I can do
    that.

    You[1] *could* open up an HDD, throw away the guts, and install a
    circuit board with all the ICs that comprise an SDD. It would be a lot
    of work and the cost of the parts would exceed the cost of an SSD.

    [1] I could, but I wouldn't. I rather doubt that you have the
    necessary skills.

    This is almost what I want to do, with the exception of throwing away the guts of the perfectly functioning HDD. Finally, someone is listening to
    what I am actually saying.

    Since you have the skill level necessary to do this, maybe you could tell
    me how to do it. How smart does one have to be to do it?

    It's not about being smart, it's in a way being the opposite.

    You would need to remove the controller board that is on the HDD, this
    may require a special screwdriver as some HDD manufacturers uses quite
    special screws, then you need to use a milling machine to make a bit of
    a space where you can place the SSD into, you need to be quite exact so
    that the SSD's SATA-connector has the same position as the removed HDD-controller board. Then you will need to glue the SSD to the metal.

    If you really want to reuse the HDD, then build a NAS (just a computer
    with a lot of harddrives), then have has storage that you can use to
    store files.
    --
    //Aho
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Richard Kettlewell@invalid@invalid.invalid to alt.os.linux on Tue May 13 08:42:48 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> writes:
    On 2025-05-12, CtrlAltDel wrote:
    Are these prices for HDD's that have been previously converted into SSD's >> or just SSD's originally?

    There is not, nor has there ever been, a HDD that has been "converted"
    into an SSD in the manner which you want to do.

    It's simply not how this stuff works, at all.

    This is one of the most successful trolls I’ve seen here in a long time.
    --
    https://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kerr-Mudd, John@admin@127.0.0.1 to alt.os.linux on Tue May 13 09:50:01 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Tue, 13 May 2025 02:43:18 +0200
    "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
    On 2025-05-13 00:22, CtrlAltDel wrote:
    On Fri, 9 May 2025 17:59:41 -0000 (UTC), evanmac wrote:

    con fecha5 May 2025 y hora 11:21:46 GMT+1, "CtrlAltDel" <Altie@BHam.com> >> sacó de su cabeza:

    if there are any apps I can use to convert them to SSD's?

    app is *SOFTware*, while HDD/SSD are *HARDware*

    Beyond that, you'd like to "convert" a fish into a bird (via software),
    seems it possible to you?

    Well, I'm using Linux Mint 22.1 if that helps any. I know you probably couldn't do anything like this on Windows but, I am using Linux.

    I mean, I already have these HDD's, why not re-purpose them and give them another function as SSD's. I've been researching it and they say solid state drives give you faster boot times, less power consumption, faster read/write speeds, etc...

    Why in the world wouldn't I want to take what I have and upgrade them into more powerful and useful drives? I know how to solder and if I need to
    buy a few parts, as long as they are very inexpensive, I can do that.

    What the fuck are you talking about?

    We told you, it is impossible to convert a hard disk into an SSD, or the reverse.

    If it looks like a troll, walks like a troll and smells like a troll... Alternatively, play along and advise opening the hard drive caddies
    and soldering them to stop them spinning.
    --
    Bah, and indeed Humbug.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dan Purgert@dan@djph.net to alt.os.linux on Tue May 13 08:56:49 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 2025-05-13, CtrlAltDel wrote:
    On Mon, 12 May 2025 22:38:32 -0500, John Hasler wrote:

    CtrlAltDel writes:
    Why in the world wouldn't I want to take what I have and upgrade them
    into more powerful and useful drives? I know how to solder and if I
    need to buy a few parts, as long as they are very inexpensive, I can do
    that.

    You[1] *could* open up an HDD, throw away the guts, and install a
    circuit board with all the ICs that comprise an SDD. It would be a lot
    of work and the cost of the parts would exceed the cost of an SSD.

    [1] I could, but I wouldn't. I rather doubt that you have the
    necessary skills.

    This is almost what I want to do, with the exception of throwing away the guts of the perfectly functioning HDD. Finally, someone is listening to what I am actually saying.

    As soon as you crack the hermetic seal on a HDD, it will no longer work.
    Oh sure, it might spin up, but the heads will almost immediately crash
    thanks to dust in the air. So, you would take a working drive, and make
    it non-working.

    Basically you're trying to ask how to "convert" your still-working VHS
    tape player into a DVD player. You can't. You have to buy a DVD player
    and plug it into your TV (oh sure, you can still KEEP the VHS player,
    and maybe plug it into a secondary TV input or something).

    Same deal with HDD ("VHS Player") to SSD ("DVD Player") for your
    computer ("the TV"). You buy a brand new SSD, and plug it into your
    computer in place of the HDD. Now, maybe you're lucky and the PC has an
    extra open SATA port and power connector, so you can have both in there
    at the same time. Otherwise you can get USB adapters and just leave the
    old HDD out on your desk.
    --
    |_|O|_|
    |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert
    |O|O|O| PGP: DDAB 23FB 19FA 7D85 1CC1 E067 6D65 70E5 4CE7 2860
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Daniel70@daniel47@eternal-september.org to alt.os.linux on Tue May 13 20:18:18 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 13/05/2025 6:50 pm, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
    On Tue, 13 May 2025 02:43:18 +0200
    "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
    On 2025-05-13 00:22, CtrlAltDel wrote:
    On Fri, 9 May 2025 17:59:41 -0000 (UTC), evanmac wrote:
    con fecha5 May 2025 y hora 11:21:46 GMT+1, "CtrlAltDel" <Altie@BHam.com> >>>> sacó de su cabeza:

    if there are any apps I can use to convert them to SSD's?

    app is *SOFTware*, while HDD/SSD are *HARDware*

    Beyond that, you'd like to "convert" a fish into a bird (via software), >>>> seems it possible to you?

    Well, I'm using Linux Mint 22.1 if that helps any. I know you probably
    couldn't do anything like this on Windows but, I am using Linux.

    I mean, I already have these HDD's, why not re-purpose them and give them >>> another function as SSD's. I've been researching it and they say solid
    state drives give you faster boot times, less power consumption, faster
    read/write speeds, etc...

    Why in the world wouldn't I want to take what I have and upgrade them into >>> more powerful and useful drives? I know how to solder and if I need to
    buy a few parts, as long as they are very inexpensive, I can do that.

    What the fuck are you talking about?

    We told you, it is impossible to convert a hard disk into an SSD, or the
    reverse.

    If it looks like a troll, walks like a troll and smells like a troll...

    Alternatively, play along and advise opening the hard drive caddies
    and soldering them to stop them spinning.

    As far as I know, SSDs are relatively new on the scene.

    Do any SSD Manufacturers actually manufacture "bare bone" SSDs which can
    then be mounted in any old HD box??

    I'm betting *NOT* !! .... cause they'd all be busy producing the
    complete units (box, interface and all) to go in NEW Computers.
    --
    Daniel70
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dan Purgert@dan@djph.net to alt.os.linux on Tue May 13 10:40:19 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 2025-05-13, Daniel70 wrote:
    On 13/05/2025 6:50 pm, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
    On Tue, 13 May 2025 02:43:18 +0200
    "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
    On 2025-05-13 00:22, CtrlAltDel wrote:
    On Fri, 9 May 2025 17:59:41 -0000 (UTC), evanmac wrote:
    con fecha5 May 2025 y hora 11:21:46 GMT+1, "CtrlAltDel" <Altie@BHam.com> >>>>> sacó de su cabeza:

    if there are any apps I can use to convert them to SSD's?

    app is *SOFTware*, while HDD/SSD are *HARDware*

    Beyond that, you'd like to "convert" a fish into a bird (via software), >>>>> seems it possible to you?

    Well, I'm using Linux Mint 22.1 if that helps any. I know you probably >>>> couldn't do anything like this on Windows but, I am using Linux.

    I mean, I already have these HDD's, why not re-purpose them and give them >>>> another function as SSD's. I've been researching it and they say solid >>>> state drives give you faster boot times, less power consumption, faster >>>> read/write speeds, etc...

    Why in the world wouldn't I want to take what I have and upgrade them into >>>> more powerful and useful drives? I know how to solder and if I need to >>>> buy a few parts, as long as they are very inexpensive, I can do that.

    What the fuck are you talking about?

    We told you, it is impossible to convert a hard disk into an SSD, or the >>> reverse.

    If it looks like a troll, walks like a troll and smells like a troll...

    Alternatively, play along and advise opening the hard drive caddies
    and soldering them to stop them spinning.

    As far as I know, SSDs are relatively new on the scene.

    Do any SSD Manufacturers actually manufacture "bare bone" SSDs which can then be mounted in any old HD box??

    No, they're a discrete part that gets slotted into an existing empty
    slot in the PC, or replaces the existing HDD. Just plug in the SATA and
    power cables, and you're done.

    There is not, nor has there ever been a route where you physically open
    up a HDD, replace its guts with "SSD Guts", and end up with an SSD.

    Unless, of course, the entire premise here is that CtrlAltDel is calling
    his PC Tower the "HDD".
    --
    |_|O|_|
    |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert
    |O|O|O| PGP: DDAB 23FB 19FA 7D85 1CC1 E067 6D65 70E5 4CE7 2860
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Carlos E.R.@robin_listas@es.invalid to alt.os.linux on Tue May 13 13:05:31 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 2025-05-13 07:32, CtrlAltDel wrote:
    On Tue, 13 May 2025 02:43:18 +0200, Carlos E.R. wrote:

    What the fuck are you talking about?

    We told you, it is impossible to convert a hard disk into an SSD, or the
    reverse.


    You aren't being very helpful. The poster named John Hasler is being much more gracious than you and seems to know how to do what I am requesting.

    Thanks, anyway.

    I suggested the same thing as he did, days ago, and you ignored it.

    Replacing the innards of a hard disk is something only an expert can do;
    you are not, or you would not be asking. Nobody has done this before, it
    is a ridiculous idea.

    Oh, and the innards of the hard disk become destroyed in the process.

    Thus, you are probably a troll.
    --
    Cheers, Carlos.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John Hasler@john@sugarbit.com to alt.os.linux on Tue May 13 07:49:20 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    "Kerr-Mudd, John" writes:
    Alternatively, play along and advise opening the hard drive caddies
    and soldering them to stop them spinning.

    Fill the HDD case with epoxy. That will make it "solid state".
    --
    John Hasler
    john@sugarbit.com
    Dancing Horse Hill
    Elmwood, WI USA
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John Hasler@john@sugarbit.com to alt.os.linux on Tue May 13 07:43:15 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    CtrlAltDel writes:
    This is almost what I want to do, with the exception of throwing away
    the guts of the perfectly functioning HDD.

    Do you understand how HDDs and SSDs work? An HDD stores data
    magnetically on a rotating disk driven by a motor. The data is read and written by a read/write head mounted on an arm driven by another motor.
    An SSD stores data electrically inside special-purpose integrated
    circuits.

    The only parts that an HDD and an SSD have in common are the connectors.
    None of those perfectly working HDD guts are of any use for the SSD you
    plan to build in that case[1]. You have to remove them to make room for
    the SSD parts.

    Since you have the skill level necessary to do this, maybe you could
    tell me how to do it.

    Start by getting a degree in electrical engineering with a
    specialization in electronics. Or you could do as others have
    suggested: buy a small SSD and mount it inside the empty HDD case. But
    what would be the point in doing that?

    [1] You might be able to salvage a few of the ICs for reuse.
    --
    John Hasler
    john@sugarbit.com
    Dancing Horse Hill
    Elmwood, WI USA
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Chris Elvidge@chris@internal.net to alt.os.linux on Tue May 13 14:37:55 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 13/05/2025 at 06:30, CtrlAltDel wrote:
    On Mon, 12 May 2025 22:38:32 -0500, John Hasler wrote:

    CtrlAltDel writes:
    Why in the world wouldn't I want to take what I have and upgrade them
    into more powerful and useful drives? I know how to solder and if I
    need to buy a few parts, as long as they are very inexpensive, I can do
    that.

    You[1] *could* open up an HDD, throw away the guts, and install a
    circuit board with all the ICs that comprise an SDD. It would be a lot
    of work and the cost of the parts would exceed the cost of an SSD.

    [1] I could, but I wouldn't. I rather doubt that you have the
    necessary skills.

    This is almost what I want to do, with the exception of throwing away the guts of the perfectly functioning HDD. Finally, someone is listening to
    what I am actually saying.

    Since you have the skill level necessary to do this, maybe you could tell
    me how to do it. How smart does one have to be to do it?


    Buy one of these https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/265882169151?_skw=kingston+ssd&itmmeta=01JV4XMD2VHC6GHRB7812VFTPT&hash=item3de7cfef3f%3Ag%3AlgIAAOSwK7BjHz4U&itmprp=enc%3AAQAKAAAA0FkggFvd1GGDu0w3yXCmi1eS01YmYRRNYjrqJG8FGYYGKU5RVL17wRWssQ0K7mD0eN5KV2jM88UZLYmo7h4DQWcuCQuYxbJxmNISUXp5JRxUGEa0FFTeC0bc8nc%2F9z8juHti0HTtxVcCfBDeZVimEp07se1YkFLfcUhMRax70cqy2ptE3J%2Bd%2FuE6Fp%2FnS10eDjUhC4Ca9w6MM1VjKJd8%2BUY4Cu%2FujP0QurYXXH7u%2B8kcDq%2FeaYLjXY8JIO8kb%2BbwvPmp%2F9qEo5fxnKVcWi6MTxU%3D%7Ctkp%3ABlBMUNrR0Z3ZZQ&var=565708498598

    Or similar. All the work already done. 960Gb ~ £60.
    --
    Chris Elvidge, England
    MY HOMEWORK WAS NOT STOLEN BY A ONE-ARMED MAN

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kerr-Mudd, John@admin@127.0.0.1 to alt.os.linux on Tue May 13 16:22:32 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Tue, 13 May 2025 14:37:55 +0100
    Chris Elvidge <chris@internal.net> wrote:
    On 13/05/2025 at 06:30, CtrlAltDel wrote:
    On Mon, 12 May 2025 22:38:32 -0500, John Hasler wrote:

    CtrlAltDel writes:
    Why in the world wouldn't I want to take what I have and upgrade them
    into more powerful and useful drives? I know how to solder and if I
    need to buy a few parts, as long as they are very inexpensive, I can do >>> that.

    You[1] *could* open up an HDD, throw away the guts, and install a
    circuit board with all the ICs that comprise an SDD. It would be a lot
    of work and the cost of the parts would exceed the cost of an SSD.

    [1] I could, but I wouldn't. I rather doubt that you have the
    necessary skills.

    This is almost what I want to do, with the exception of throwing away the guts of the perfectly functioning HDD. Finally, someone is listening to what I am actually saying.

    Since you have the skill level necessary to do this, maybe you could tell me how to do it. How smart does one have to be to do it?


    Buy one of these https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/265882169151?_skw=kingston+ssd&itmmeta=01JV4XMD2VHC6GHRB7812VFTPT&hash=item3de7cfef3f%3Ag%3AlgIAAOSwK7BjHz4U&itmprp=enc%3AAQAKAAAA0FkggFvd1GGDu0w3yXCmi1eS01YmYRRNYjrqJG8FGYYGKU5RVL17wRWssQ0K7mD0eN5KV2jM88UZLYmo7h4DQWcuCQuYxbJxmNISUXp5JRxUGEa0FFTeC0bc8nc%2F9z8juHti0HTtxVcCfBDeZVimEp07se1YkFLfcUhMRax70cqy2ptE3J%2Bd%2FuE6Fp%2FnS10eDjUhC4Ca9w6MM1VjKJd8%2BUY4Cu%2FujP0QurYXXH7u%2B8kcDq%2FeaYLjXY8JIO8kb%2BbwvPmp%2F9qEo5fxnKVcWi6MTxU%3D%7Ctkp%3ABlBMUNrR0Z3ZZQ&var=565708498598

    Or similar. All the work already done. 960Gb ~ £60.

    I wouldn't trust the wear limits on an ssd card. Can I open it up and
    resolder it into a proper spinning rust Hard Drive?
    Jeez. Still, it's a bit of fun.
    --
    Bah, and indeed Humbug.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dan Purgert@dan@djph.net to alt.os.linux on Tue May 13 18:23:17 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 2025-05-13, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
    On Tue, 13 May 2025 14:37:55 +0100
    Chris Elvidge <chris@internal.net> wrote:

    On 13/05/2025 at 06:30, CtrlAltDel wrote:
    On Mon, 12 May 2025 22:38:32 -0500, John Hasler wrote:

    CtrlAltDel writes:
    Why in the world wouldn't I want to take what I have and upgrade them
    into more powerful and useful drives? I know how to solder and if I
    need to buy a few parts, as long as they are very inexpensive, I can do >> >>> that.

    You[1] *could* open up an HDD, throw away the guts, and install a
    circuit board with all the ICs that comprise an SDD. It would be a lot >> >> of work and the cost of the parts would exceed the cost of an SSD.

    [1] I could, but I wouldn't. I rather doubt that you have the
    necessary skills.

    This is almost what I want to do, with the exception of throwing away the >> > guts of the perfectly functioning HDD. Finally, someone is listening to >> > what I am actually saying.

    Since you have the skill level necessary to do this, maybe you could tell >> > me how to do it. How smart does one have to be to do it?


    Buy one of these
    https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/265882169151?_skw=kingston+ssd&itmmeta=01JV4XMD2VHC6GHRB7812VFTPT&hash=item3de7cfef3f%3Ag%3AlgIAAOSwK7BjHz4U&itmprp=enc%3AAQAKAAAA0FkggFvd1GGDu0w3yXCmi1eS01YmYRRNYjrqJG8FGYYGKU5RVL17wRWssQ0K7mD0eN5KV2jM88UZLYmo7h4DQWcuCQuYxbJxmNISUXp5JRxUGEa0FFTeC0bc8nc%2F9z8juHti0HTtxVcCfBDeZVimEp07se1YkFLfcUhMRax70cqy2ptE3J%2Bd%2FuE6Fp%2FnS10eDjUhC4Ca9w6MM1VjKJd8%2BUY4Cu%2FujP0QurYXXH7u%2B8kcDq%2FeaYLjXY8JIO8kb%2BbwvPmp%2F9qEo5fxnKVcWi6MTxU%3D%7Ctkp%3ABlBMUNrR0Z3ZZQ&var=565708498598

    Or similar. All the work already done. 960Gb ~ £60.

    I wouldn't trust the wear limits on an ssd card. Can I open it up and resolder it into a proper spinning rust Hard Drive?

    On the off chance you're actually serious ...

    No.
    --
    |_|O|_|
    |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert
    |O|O|O| PGP: DDAB 23FB 19FA 7D85 1CC1 E067 6D65 70E5 4CE7 2860
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul@nospam@needed.invalid to alt.os.linux on Tue May 13 14:45:23 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Mon, 5/12/2025 8:43 PM, Carlos E.R. wrote:
    On 2025-05-13 00:22, CtrlAltDel wrote:
    On Fri, 9 May 2025 17:59:41 -0000 (UTC), evanmac wrote:

    con fecha5 May 2025 y hora 11:21:46 GMT+1, "CtrlAltDel" <Altie@BHam.com> >>> sacó de su cabeza:

    if there are any apps I can use to convert them to SSD's?

    app is *SOFTware*, while HDD/SSD are *HARDware*

    Beyond that, you'd like to "convert" a fish into a bird (via software),
    seems it possible to you?

    Well, I'm using Linux Mint 22.1 if that helps any.  I know you probably
    couldn't do anything like this on Windows but, I am using Linux.

    I mean, I already have these HDD's, why not re-purpose them and give them
    another function as SSD's. I've been researching it and they say solid
    state drives give you faster boot times, less power consumption, faster
    read/write speeds, etc...

    Why in the world wouldn't I want to take what I have and upgrade them into >> more powerful and useful drives?  I know how to solder and if I need to
    buy a few parts, as long as they are very inexpensive, I can do that.

    What the fuck are you talking about?

    We told you, it is impossible to convert a hard disk into an SSD, or the reverse.


    It could be a terminology issue.

    You can *clone* a slow HDD onto a faster SSD. This is
    not exactly the best way to do it, and is merely an
    illustration of doing it in the old days. This would cause
    excess wear on the destination SSD (writing 512 byte chunks
    to 64K pages would be stupid). However, the Linux System Write cache
    is going to change the transaction size at some point, so this
    is not as bad as a superficial analysis would indicate.

    sudo dd /dev/sda /dev/sdb # Works well if the disks are exactly the same size.
    # We actually have some SSDs that are exactly
    the same size to the byte. as 1TB HDDs.

    You can't convert motors and heads into NAND flash chips,
    so you cannot exactly convert between hardware type.
    This is not exactly a "Tea, Earl Gray, Hot" machine :-)

    By cloning an older disk, you can move the contents
    from one place to another.

    *******

    As an experiment, I took my Lexar NS100 256GB SSD and tried to move
    it to my WD Blue 250GB HDD. This was just a test to see how
    easy it is for a Year Of The Linux Desktop user, to move from one
    disk to another.

    1) Clonezilla

    It warned that it does not handle destination disks which are smaller than the source.
    while I did not test it, there is no reason to believe they could handle the
    other case. (If you move a GPT partitioned disk to a larger disk, you have to relocate
    the GPT table to the correct offset, and not all softwares do this correctly. There are
    yet other softwares that detect this error, and they will put up a warning dialog.)

    Clonezilla still offered to carry on, even though the partition would not fit, and
    a second error dialog appeared when the transfer failed ("no space").

    Conclusion: Not ready for prime time. This kind of behavior causes user hair loss.

    2) Gparted

    Now, I like Gparted. You can (almost) always get a result with it.
    Only once did it trip in a spectacular fashion and drop all its drinks on the floor.

    sudo gparted

    OK, so to start with, I thoroughly erased the destination disk. That's
    for the purposes of doing experiments, I don't want to pollute the
    results via the "history" of the disk drive.

    The first step, is getting GParted to prepare the device for GPT partitioning. This might be termed as "Initialize" or "Disk Initialize", and you have to select MSDOS or GPT, to match the partition scheme used on the source disk.

    Next, in Gparted, the menu has "Copy" and "Paste". This is how we clone!

    You can highlight a partition on /dev/sda, select "Copy", then change
    the disk selector to the blank-GPT /dev/sdb and press "Paste".

    When the destination drive is too small, or, there is no available space
    big enough for a too-large partition, the Paste menu item is greyed out.
    This means you need to do a "shrink" on the source partition, before
    a Copy/Paste to the second smaller disk drive will work. Fair enough.

    GParted will not do an on-the-fly resize like some commercial
    softwares offer. That's fine. Breaking the operation into two atomic steps,
    is all part of the "component nature" of Partition Management. Utilities
    do not act greedy with the convenience functions. They strive for accuracy
    and "no damage to user goods". That's the way it should be.

    So I got my materials onto the destination.

    Two issues and three work items:

    1) Partition types (not IDs as such) are still wrong. Dest was 0700, should be EF00.
    2) There are duplicate UUID and since the boot sequence may depend
    on the exact UUIDs, fooling with them can break boot.
    3) Once UUID issue has been resolved, the Boot Repair from YannUbuntu
    is needed, for a convenient reinstallation of GRUB.

    Using

    sudo blkid

    I got a dump of the identifiers for the partitions on the source and destination.
    The PARTUUID (not used for boot but used as identifiers on the GPT partition table entries), are easily randomized. The "sudo gdisk /dev/sda" then X and K, can use the expert mode randomize function, and that changes the PARTUUID.
    I think it's a natural part of cloning, that the destination disk PARTUUID
    ends up different anyway. We are "over-covered" on that one. The PARTUUID is highly likely to be treated well.

    The main UUID number listed is for the filesystem itself, and when you clone partitions,
    the destination disk should have new UUID values generated. I expect the "blkid" utility can do this for you, but I did not complete that part.

    When I checked with GDisk, I noticed

    /dev/sda EF00 (EFI ESP partition type) [Source Disk]
    /dev/sdb 8300 Linux partition type (there is now a value just for this)

    /dev/sdb 0700 When GParted cloned, it only noticed the FAT32 aspect, it did *not* make an ESP declaration
    /dev/sdb 8300 This one was cloned properly. No complaint.

    Then I had to do

    sudo gdisk /dev/sdb

    and change the partition declaration on small EFI partition to "EF00".

    By doing this, the Boot Repair DVD I used, it stopped complaining about
    my setup on /dev/sdb . I was trying to do a boot repair, while pretending
    my UUID values were fixed (didn't finish that part), and the Boot Repair
    was puking when it saw the "0700" and not "EF00".

    The 2023 disk is the latest "boot repair disc". If you make a DVD of this,
    it's a hybrid boot. This might matter, if you were using a 2025 laptop
    and it was Secure Boot only.

    https://sourceforge.net/projects/boot-repair-cd/files/

    The base program is in the Ubuntu/Mint repository, so it can also be
    pulled into a LiveCD session with other materials you have on hand.

    Since I didn't change UUID values, my boot of /dev/sdb would have worked anyway. It is only if you correct the UUID situation, that a Boot Repair
    is needed.

    If I had succeeded in correcting the UUID (assign new values), then,
    I could plug both the original 256GB device and the clone 250GB device,
    and the "wrong partition" would not get used as my /home. This is why we
    seek to have non-colliding UUID. If the boot identifiers are based
    on UUID, then each GRUB must use the correct UUID values to be self
    consistent. In this way, booting /dev/sda uses only partitions on SDA.
    And booting /dev/sdb uses only partitions on SDB. We don't want any
    boot accidents, where grub boots SDB and uses /dev/sda2. Important
    user data could get put in the wrong place, if we're careless
    with this stuff.

    I think you can see there is room for better automation. We're still
    treated very well, compared to if we had no tools at all :-) But there
    is still some room for improvement on UUID issues.

    If we didn't have the Boot Repair DVD, it would not be the end
    of the world. We could go get the Gentoo installation manual
    and learn how to chroot in and do the necessary GRUB re-installation
    that way. The Boot Repair DVD merely helps you avoid dropping
    to the command line and doing that.

    *******

    Storage devices come in two sizes

    1024GB <=== Some SSDs
    1TB <=== This is 1000 GB. You can get SSDs at 1000GB, and they
    will be labeled "1TB" to avoid confusion. If your original
    HDD was 1TB, you could buy a 1TB SSD.

    When both devices are 1TB, the disk size in bytes is then exactly the same.
    The value is *not* 1TB of course, it is the next-highest-number and that
    number likely has some relation to CHS issues.

    Exactly matching size, would allow "dd" to copy a disk. But the copy is
    "too accurate", because you still have to assign new UUID to the destination partitions. Then do a Boot Repair on the destination.

    Paul


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From evanmac@ciccio@formaggio.org to alt.os.linux on Tue May 13 19:15:34 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    con fecha13 May 2025 y hora 09:50:01 GMT+1, ""Kerr-Mudd, John"" <admin@127.0.0.1> sacó de su cabeza:

    If it looks like a troll, walks like a troll and smells like a troll...

    same thing...
    --
    this is a random signature
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Carlos E.R.@robin_listas@es.invalid to alt.os.linux on Tue May 13 21:48:35 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 2025-05-13 20:45, Paul wrote:
    On Mon, 5/12/2025 8:43 PM, Carlos E.R. wrote:
    On 2025-05-13 00:22, CtrlAltDel wrote:
    On Fri, 9 May 2025 17:59:41 -0000 (UTC), evanmac wrote:

    con fecha5 May 2025 y hora 11:21:46 GMT+1, "CtrlAltDel" <Altie@BHam.com> >>>> sacó de su cabeza:

    if there are any apps I can use to convert them to SSD's?

    app is *SOFTware*, while HDD/SSD are *HARDware*

    Beyond that, you'd like to "convert" a fish into a bird (via software), >>>> seems it possible to you?

    Well, I'm using Linux Mint 22.1 if that helps any.  I know you probably >>> couldn't do anything like this on Windows but, I am using Linux.

    I mean, I already have these HDD's, why not re-purpose them and give them >>> another function as SSD's. I've been researching it and they say solid
    state drives give you faster boot times, less power consumption, faster
    read/write speeds, etc...

    Why in the world wouldn't I want to take what I have and upgrade them into >>> more powerful and useful drives?  I know how to solder and if I need to >>> buy a few parts, as long as they are very inexpensive, I can do that.

    What the fuck are you talking about?

    We told you, it is impossible to convert a hard disk into an SSD, or the reverse.


    It could be a terminology issue.

    You can *clone* a slow HDD onto a faster SSD. This is
    not exactly the best way to do it, and is merely an
    illustration of doing it in the old days. This would cause
    excess wear on the destination SSD (writing 512 byte chunks
    to 64K pages would be stupid). However, the Linux System Write cache
    is going to change the transaction size at some point, so this
    is not as bad as a superficial analysis would indicate.

    sudo dd /dev/sda /dev/sdb # Works well if the disks are exactly the same size.
    # We actually have some SSDs that are exactly
    the same size to the byte. as 1TB HDDs.

    I would specify "bs=16M" (or any other sensible figure). From
    experiments, much faster.

    On some machines, there is the side effect that the kernel buffers fill
    up with this activity, and the rest of the processes are starved.
    Specially noticed when writing several isos to several USB (slow)
    sticks. Use then "oflag=direct".



    You can't convert motors and heads into NAND flash chips,
    so you cannot exactly convert between hardware type.
    This is not exactly a "Tea, Earl Gray, Hot" machine :-)

    By cloning an older disk, you can move the contents
    from one place to another.

    Yes, but the logical sector size must be the same. I can explain this
    with FAT: it is a table of sectors. Files are allocated several sectors
    in that table. The size of sectors must be the same, or the allocation
    doesn't match in the destination.



    *******

    As an experiment, I took my Lexar NS100 256GB SSD and tried to move
    it to my WD Blue 250GB HDD. This was just a test to see how
    easy it is for a Year Of The Linux Desktop user, to move from one
    disk to another.

    1) Clonezilla

    It warned that it does not handle destination disks which are smaller than the source.
    while I did not test it, there is no reason to believe they could handle the
    other case. (If you move a GPT partitioned disk to a larger disk, you have to relocate
    the GPT table to the correct offset, and not all softwares do this correctly. There are
    yet other softwares that detect this error, and they will put up a warning dialog.)

    Clonezilla still offered to carry on, even though the partition would not fit, and
    a second error dialog appeared when the transfer failed ("no space").

    Conclusion: Not ready for prime time. This kind of behavior causes user hair loss.

    So the professionals can make a profit ;-)



    2) Gparted

    Now, I like Gparted. You can (almost) always get a result with it.
    Only once did it trip in a spectacular fashion and drop all its drinks on the floor.

    sudo gparted

    For example, you write a partition table from scratch. You assign the partitions. Nothing written yet to disk. You decide to make one
    partition bigger or smaller: it does not allow you to do it. You have to delete that partition and all partitions behind it, which is ridiculous.



    OK, so to start with, I thoroughly erased the destination disk. That's
    for the purposes of doing experiments, I don't want to pollute the
    results via the "history" of the disk drive.

    The first step, is getting GParted to prepare the device for GPT partitioning.
    This might be termed as "Initialize" or "Disk Initialize", and you have to select MSDOS or GPT, to match the partition scheme used on the source disk.

    And this operation has to be committed before continuing.


    Next, in Gparted, the menu has "Copy" and "Paste". This is how we clone!

    You can highlight a partition on /dev/sda, select "Copy", then change
    the disk selector to the blank-GPT /dev/sdb and press "Paste".

    Ah! I never tried this.

    It copies the contents? Or only the definitions of the partitions?


    When the destination drive is too small, or, there is no available space
    big enough for a too-large partition, the Paste menu item is greyed out.
    This means you need to do a "shrink" on the source partition, before
    a Copy/Paste to the second smaller disk drive will work. Fair enough.

    It should allow to do this on the fly. Does clonezilla do it?


    GParted will not do an on-the-fly resize like some commercial
    softwares offer. That's fine. Breaking the operation into two atomic steps, is all part of the "component nature" of Partition Management. Utilities
    do not act greedy with the convenience functions. They strive for accuracy and "no damage to user goods". That's the way it should be.

    So I got my materials onto the destination.


    ...
    --
    Cheers, Carlos.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John Hasler@john@sugarbit.com to alt.os.linux on Tue May 13 15:01:29 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    CtrlAltDel writes:
    I wouldn't trust the wear limits on an ssd card. Can I open it up and resolder it into a proper spinning rust Hard Drive?

    You are making less and less sense.
    --
    John Hasler
    john@sugarbit.com
    Dancing Horse Hill
    Elmwood, WI USA
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Carlos E.R.@robin_listas@es.invalid to alt.os.linux on Tue May 13 22:32:13 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 2025-05-13 22:01, John Hasler wrote:
    CtrlAltDel writes:
    I wouldn't trust the wear limits on an ssd card. Can I open it up and
    resolder it into a proper spinning rust Hard Drive?

    You are making less and less sense.

    No, CtrlAltDel did not write that. it was somebody else, as a joke.
    --
    Cheers, Carlos.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul@nospam@needed.invalid to alt.os.linux on Tue May 13 17:55:02 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Tue, 5/13/2025 8:43 AM, John Hasler wrote:
    CtrlAltDel writes:
    This is almost what I want to do, with the exception of throwing away
    the guts of the perfectly functioning HDD.

    Do you understand how HDDs and SSDs work? An HDD stores data
    magnetically on a rotating disk driven by a motor. The data is read and written by a read/write head mounted on an arm driven by another motor.
    An SSD stores data electrically inside special-purpose integrated
    circuits.

    The only parts that an HDD and an SSD have in common are the connectors.
    None of those perfectly working HDD guts are of any use for the SSD you
    plan to build in that case[1]. You have to remove them to make room for
    the SSD parts.

    Since you have the skill level necessary to do this, maybe you could
    tell me how to do it.

    Start by getting a degree in electrical engineering with a
    specialization in electronics. Or you could do as others have
    suggested: buy a small SSD and mount it inside the empty HDD case. But
    what would be the point in doing that?

    [1] You might be able to salvage a few of the ICs for reuse.


    I think there is almost room to do that, as it is.

    Some controller boards are slightly elevated, and there are some foam
    inserts to cushion the controller PCB.

    You just have to make sure the plane the connector is in,
    on the Z axis, is correct with respect to the drive outer dimensions.
    That makes the project slide-in compatible with SATA backplanes,
    and various kinds of trays for racks.

    You void the warranty by opening the SSD casing. It's up to you
    as to whether that is important or not. For example, some brands,
    the warranty is likely useless in any case.

    The disk drive design, presents the secondary side of the PCB
    to the environment. There are no components on that side,
    as a result. SMT components would get scraped off, if exposed.
    That's why the controller board was rotated and turned inwards,
    years ago.

    Some of the connectors on the original HDD are compression types
    (screwing down the PCB, helps the connectors mate). These do not
    matter, when your SSD board is plugged in there.

    I think the project is do-able, but doesn't seem attractive
    to me, unless it opened up new operating possibilities.
    Since the 2.5" SSD is already pretty compact, there isn't
    much benefit to turning it into a much larger brick.

    Paul


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul@nospam@needed.invalid to alt.os.linux on Tue May 13 18:07:44 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Tue, 5/13/2025 9:37 AM, Chris Elvidge wrote:
    On 13/05/2025 at 06:30, CtrlAltDel wrote:
    On Mon, 12 May 2025 22:38:32 -0500, John Hasler wrote:

    CtrlAltDel writes:
    Why in the world wouldn't I want to take what I have and upgrade them
    into more powerful and useful drives?  I know how to solder and if I
    need to buy a few parts, as long as they are very inexpensive, I can do >>>> that.

    You[1] *could* open up an  HDD, throw away the guts, and install a
    circuit board with all the ICs that comprise an SDD.  It would be a lot >>> of work and the cost of the parts would exceed the cost of an SSD.

    [1]  I could, but I wouldn't.  I rather doubt that you have the
    necessary skills.

    This is almost what I want to do, with the exception of throwing away the
    guts of the perfectly functioning HDD.  Finally, someone is listening to
    what I am actually saying.

    Since you have the skill level necessary to do this, maybe you could tell
    me how to do it.  How smart does one have to be to do it?


    Buy one of these https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/265882169151

    Or similar. All the work already done. 960Gb ~ £60.


    Those could well be Sandforce, and can draw 7 watts peak.
    Sandforce uses a "compressor" before it does writes. the
    compression feature is what made them "warm". Other brands
    don't do it that way. If you go "Kingston", get the details
    on the controller type first.

    The excessive consumption, affects connecting those to
    USB3 to SATA cables.

    When you connect drives of that form factor to desktop
    computers, and the power cables are not sleeved, you can
    place a clamp-on DC ammeter around the cable and find out
    what kind of current is drawn. On my SSD right now, doing
    reads, it draws 5V @ 0.35A on the red wire, and it actually
    isn't running at full speed at the moment. Whereas the max
    is listed as 5V @ 1.1A (5.5 watts).

    Paul
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Anssi Saari@anssi.saari@usenet.mail.kapsi.fi to alt.os.linux on Wed May 14 06:21:51 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> writes:

    2) Gparted

    Next, in Gparted, the menu has "Copy" and "Paste". This is how we clone!

    Interesting. While I'm a fan of Gparted, I've never used it to copy
    partitions. Only to create, remove, resize, and move partitions and it's
    been great for that. Good to know it can do more.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CtrlAltDel@Altie@BHam.com to alt.os.linux on Wed May 14 08:51:48 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    Thanks for the responses, everyone, both genuine and sarcastic. I'm
    beginning to get the idea that what I wish to do can't be done, although
    I'm still not sure why.

    The thing is, I hate to waste anything. Just think of all the metal and
    parts and cards and plastic, etc... that will be useless and can't be
    recycled or anything if I can no longer use the 3 HDD drives I currently
    have.

    There is only a finite amount of materials on Planet Earth and we all need
    to do our part to conserve in order to make the world a better place.
    That's how I feel about it, but I'm American and we all think like that, whereas many others around the world probably don't.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dan Purgert@dan@djph.net to alt.os.linux on Wed May 14 09:02:22 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 2025-05-14, CtrlAltDel wrote:
    Thanks for the responses, everyone, both genuine and sarcastic. I'm beginning to get the idea that what I wish to do can't be done, although
    I'm still not sure why.

    For the same reason that you cannot "convert" a Betamax player into a
    BluRay player, or a 486 desktop into a laptop, etc.

    You can certinly *REPLACE* one thing with the other, of course.


    The thing is, I hate to waste anything. Just think of all the metal and parts and cards and plastic, etc... that will be useless and can't be recycled or anything if I can no longer use the 3 HDD drives I currently have.

    Nobody said you can't still use them. You'll just need another
    available SATA port for the new SSD you want to add, or you'll need to
    pull out one or more of the old HDDs to make room.

    If you have to remove an HDD, then just get an external USB enclosure if
    you want to keep using it.


    There is only a finite amount of materials on Planet Earth and we all
    need to do our part to conserve in order to make the world a better
    place.

    While laudable, that's not how hard drives work.

    That's how I feel about it, but I'm American and we all think like that, whereas many others around the world probably don't.

    No, the majority of Americans don't have delusions that hermetically
    sealed devices have "replaceable parts" inside.
    --
    |_|O|_|
    |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert
    |O|O|O| PGP: DDAB 23FB 19FA 7D85 1CC1 E067 6D65 70E5 4CE7 2860
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Daniel70@daniel47@eternal-september.org to alt.os.linux on Wed May 14 19:25:41 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 14/05/2025 1:22 am, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
    On Tue, 13 May 2025 14:37:55 +0100
    Chris Elvidge <chris@internal.net> wrote:
    On 13/05/2025 at 06:30, CtrlAltDel wrote:

    <Snip>

    Since you have the skill level necessary to do this, maybe you could tell >>> me how to do it. How smart does one have to be to do it?


    Buy one of these
    https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/265882169151?_skw=kingston+ssd&itmmeta=01JV4XMD2VHC6GHRB7812VFTPT&hash=item3de7cfef3f%3Ag%3AlgIAAOSwK7BjHz4U&itmprp=enc%3AAQAKAAAA0FkggFvd1GGDu0w3yXCmi1eS01YmYRRNYjrqJG8FGYYGKU5RVL17wRWssQ0K7mD0eN5KV2jM88UZLYmo7h4DQWcuCQuYxbJxmNISUXp5JRxUGEa0FFTeC0bc8nc%2F9z8juHti0HTtxVcCfBDeZVimEp07se1YkFLfcUhMRax70cqy2ptE3J%2Bd%2FuE6Fp%2FnS10eDjUhC4Ca9w6MM1VjKJd8%2BUY4Cu%2FujP0QurYXXH7u%2B8kcDq%2FeaYLjXY8JIO8kb%2BbwvPmp%2F9qEo5fxnKVcWi6MTxU%3D%7Ctkp%3ABlBMUNrR0Z3ZZQ&var=565708498598

    Or similar. All the work already done. 960Gb ~ £60.

    I wouldn't trust the wear limits on an ssd card. Can I open it up and resolder it into a proper spinning rust Hard Drive?

    Jeez. Still, it's a bit of fun.

    "the wear limits"?? What 'wear'?? Turning gates from 'One' to 'Zero'!
    --
    Daniel70
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Daniel70@daniel47@eternal-september.org to alt.os.linux on Wed May 14 19:30:55 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 14/05/2025 7:02 pm, Dan Purgert wrote:
    On 2025-05-14, CtrlAltDel wrote:
    Thanks for the responses, everyone, both genuine and sarcastic. I'm
    beginning to get the idea that what I wish to do can't be done, although
    I'm still not sure why.

    For the same reason that you cannot "convert" a Betamax player into a
    BluRay player, or a 486 desktop into a laptop, etc.

    ... or turn a Mini Cooper S into a Batmobile, I'm guessing! ;-P

    You can certinly *REPLACE* one thing with the other, of course.
    --
    Daniel70
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Chris Elvidge@chris@internal.net to alt.os.linux on Wed May 14 11:08:07 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 14/05/2025 at 09:51, CtrlAltDel wrote:
    Thanks for the responses, everyone, both genuine and sarcastic. I'm
    beginning to get the idea that what I wish to do can't be done, although
    I'm still not sure why.

    The thing is, I hate to waste anything. Just think of all the metal and
    parts and cards and plastic, etc... that will be useless and can't be recycled or anything if I can no longer use the 3 HDD drives I currently have.

    There is only a finite amount of materials on Planet Earth and we all need
    to do our part to conserve in order to make the world a better place.
    That's how I feel about it, but I'm American and we all think like that, whereas many others around the world probably don't.


    Thing is, if you take the innards out of an HDD, they (the innards)
    become unusable. So saving the planet by reusing the HDD case is
    actually a non-starter.
    --
    Chris Elvidge, England
    I WILL NOT BARF UNLESS I'M SICK

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Carlos E.R.@robin_listas@es.invalid to alt.os.linux on Wed May 14 12:11:53 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 2025-05-14 10:51, CtrlAltDel wrote:
    Thanks for the responses, everyone, both genuine and sarcastic. I'm
    beginning to get the idea that what I wish to do can't be done, although
    I'm still not sure why.

    The thing is, I hate to waste anything. Just think of all the metal and
    parts and cards and plastic, etc... that will be useless and can't be recycled or anything if I can no longer use the 3 HDD drives I currently have.

    There is only a finite amount of materials on Planet Earth and we all need
    to do our part to conserve in order to make the world a better place.
    That's how I feel about it, but I'm American and we all think like that, whereas many others around the world probably don't.

    You do not save anything by "converting" an HDD into an SSD. You end
    having to garbage the same amount of parts.

    It is like "converting" a valve radio into a transistor radio. You end
    up with an empty transistor radio box, and a box full of valves and
    radio innards that you have to garbage, instead of having two working
    radios at the start.
    --
    Cheers, Carlos.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dan Purgert@dan@djph.net to alt.os.linux on Wed May 14 10:25:22 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 2025-05-14, Daniel70 wrote:
    On 14/05/2025 1:22 am, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
    I wouldn't trust the wear limits on an ssd card. Can I open it up and
    resolder it into a proper spinning rust Hard Drive?

    Jeez. Still, it's a bit of fun.

    "the wear limits"?? What 'wear'?? Turning gates from 'One' to 'Zero'!

    Yes, actually. Writing to a flash chip physically degrades the floating
    gates, because you need to use a comparatively high voltage to cross the insulating layer between the floating gate and control gate. For
    example, if normal operating voltage of the thing is 1.8 volts, you
    might need 6 volts to write. Eventually this degrades the insulation
    enough that you get bit-errors.


    Realistically though, there are enough memory cells (plus spares) that
    you can write the full capacity of the drive once a day, every day for
    about 18 months straight -- usually the "total bytes written" is
    on average about 400x more than the stated capacity. Or, if you're
    using it like the "average person", it's somewhere on the order of 5-7
    years; which is about on-par with spinning rust (yeah yeah, I know
    everyone has that drive that's been in their 486 toaster since 1990 and
    is still "working fine").
    --
    |_|O|_|
    |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert
    |O|O|O| PGP: DDAB 23FB 19FA 7D85 1CC1 E067 6D65 70E5 4CE7 2860
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From evanmac@ciccio@formaggio.org to alt.os.linux on Wed May 14 12:05:53 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    con fecha14 May 2025 y hora 09:51:48 GMT+1, "CtrlAltDel" <Altie@BHam.com> sacó de su cabeza:

    There is only a finite amount of materials on Planet Earth and we all need
    to do our part to conserve in order to make the world a better place.
    That's how I feel about it, but I'm American and we all think like that, whereas many others around the world probably don't.

    american or not, you're definitely a troll...
    --
    this is a random signature
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From J.O. Aho@user@example.net to alt.os.linux on Wed May 14 16:16:43 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 14/05/2025 10.51, CtrlAltDel wrote:

    There is only a finite amount of materials on Planet Earth and we all need
    to do our part to conserve in order to make the world a better place.
    That's how I feel about it, but I'm American and we all think like that, whereas many others around the world probably don't.

    Use them as they are, they could work nicely in a NAS as network storage
    at your home, there will be a day when the disk will not be of any use anymore, then take it to recycle, they can recycle quite a lot and they
    will then produce something new.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul@nospam@needed.invalid to alt.os.linux on Wed May 14 16:49:04 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Wed, 5/14/2025 4:51 AM, CtrlAltDel wrote:
    Thanks for the responses, everyone, both genuine and sarcastic. I'm beginning to get the idea that what I wish to do can't be done, although
    I'm still not sure why.

    The thing is, I hate to waste anything. Just think of all the metal and parts and cards and plastic, etc... that will be useless and can't be recycled or anything if I can no longer use the 3 HDD drives I currently have.

    There is only a finite amount of materials on Planet Earth and we all need to do our part to conserve in order to make the world a better place. That's how I feel about it, but I'm American and we all think like that, whereas many others around the world probably don't.


    They don't have to go to waste.

    https://www.westerndigital.com/company/programs/easy-recycle

    The only problem with local recyclers, is they will at least
    harvest the chassis metal. But routing the magnets to the
    right place, is a larger ask for them.

    When done the careless way, they use chipper machines, and just grind
    the device into base materials, then run a separation method to
    put the PCB chips in one pile, the metal chassis bits in another pile.
    The purpose of this, is avoiding the need for staff with screwdrivers
    to take it apart the manual way.

    But if the owner of the drive, separates the bits into piles, the PCBs
    can be sent to the local electronics recycler, the chassis to the
    aluminum guy... and the rest could be sent to WDC. That would avoid
    sending a box at postal rates, with the entire mass in it.

    One thing they're running out of, is Helium (for the Helium-filled drives).
    but Helium is available if people want it (it is a residual gas in
    natural gas wells but requires "separation" to get it.

    *******

    More than one company, has robots that do the entire disassembly of hard drives.
    While my country would use our chipper plant to destroy them, other
    companies don't even use humans to get the magnets. Robots do it.
    (No, not robots with arms and legs. Minimal robots, as in NC machines.)
    This means if recycling Helium drives, the workstation needs a milling
    bit, to mill the welded cover edge off. Whereas conventional air breather drives, can be taken apart with robotic screwdrivers on an actuator
    assembly. It's likely a human places the HDD in the correct X-Y position
    on the table, and just walks away. When they come back, the table should
    be clear, ready for the next one to be oriented correctly for disassembly.
    One of the screw holes may be hidden under a label, which is
    part of the fun.

    https://img.youtube.com/vi/jegH5YrSTgo/maxresdefault.jpg

    You can use any level of care and attention suits your purpose.
    Me sending one to the chipper plant, is good enough.

    Paul
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CtrlAltDel@Altie@BHam.com to alt.os.linux on Wed May 14 21:30:56 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Wed, 14 May 2025 16:49:04 -0400, Paul wrote:



    They don't have to go to waste.

    https://www.westerndigital.com/company/programs/easy-recycle

    The only problem with local recyclers, is they will at least harvest the chassis metal. But routing the magnets to the right place, is a larger
    ask for them.

    When done the careless way, they use chipper machines, and just grind
    the device into base materials, then run a separation method to put the
    PCB chips in one pile, the metal chassis bits in another pile.
    The purpose of this, is avoiding the need for staff with screwdrivers to
    take it apart the manual way.

    But if the owner of the drive, separates the bits into piles, the PCBs
    can be sent to the local electronics recycler, the chassis to the
    aluminum guy... and the rest could be sent to WDC. That would avoid
    sending a box at postal rates, with the entire mass in it.

    One thing they're running out of, is Helium (for the Helium-filled
    drives).
    but Helium is available if people want it (it is a residual gas in
    natural gas wells but requires "separation" to get it.

    *******

    More than one company, has robots that do the entire disassembly of hard drives.
    While my country would use our chipper plant to destroy them, other
    companies don't even use humans to get the magnets. Robots do it.
    (No, not robots with arms and legs. Minimal robots, as in NC machines.)
    This means if recycling Helium drives, the workstation needs a milling
    bit, to mill the welded cover edge off. Whereas conventional air
    breather drives, can be taken apart with robotic screwdrivers on an
    actuator assembly. It's likely a human places the HDD in the correct X-Y position on the table, and just walks away. When they come back, the
    table should be clear, ready for the next one to be oriented correctly
    for disassembly.
    One of the screw holes may be hidden under a label, which is part of the
    fun.

    https://img.youtube.com/vi/jegH5YrSTgo/maxresdefault.jpg

    You can use any level of care and attention suits your purpose.
    Me sending one to the chipper plant, is good enough.


    Those are all great ideas, for people that don't care about the Earth or
    the environment or conservation. All these options you mention are
    horrible suggestions, frankly.

    Do you know how much energy it takes to run machines like shredders, granulators,and separators and assorted automated robots? And don't even mention the balers. Just think of it. My God, imagine the destruction of precious wildlife and land resources originally done when getting the
    metal ore, limestone, coal, etc... out of the earth to create these huge, monstrous machines.

    One day's operation at a recycling plant probably uses more gas, oil, electricity, etc... than a normal family in a normal sized home would in a thousand years.

    Add to this all the gasoline used by employees in vehicles that are used
    every single day to drive to and from their employment. Then each day
    when they go home they shower or take a bath, which is a tremendous waste
    of precious Mother Earth's water supply.

    These same employees have to feed their bodies food to sustain them during their workdays, also.

    It just goes on and on and on. I would rather have just converted my HDD drives into SSD's like I originally stated but, I guess that isn't
    possible.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CtrlAltDel@Altie@BHam.com to alt.os.linux on Wed May 14 21:51:53 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Wed, 14 May 2025 12:05:53 -0000 (UTC), evanmac wrote:

    con fecha14 May 2025 y hora 09:51:48 GMT+1, "CtrlAltDel"
    <Altie@BHam.com> sacó de su cabeza:

    There is only a finite amount of materials on Planet Earth and we all
    need to do our part to conserve in order to make the world a better
    place. That's how I feel about it, but I'm American and we all think
    like that, whereas many others around the world probably don't.

    american or not, you're definitely a troll...

    Leaving your xenophobic mentality aside, I was only inquiring about
    something I wasn't sure about. That hardly makes me a troll.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul@nospam@needed.invalid to alt.os.linux on Wed May 14 18:00:05 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Wed, 5/14/2025 5:30 PM, CtrlAltDel wrote:


    It just goes on and on and on. I would rather have just converted my HDD drives into SSD's like I originally stated but, I guess that isn't
    possible.


    There is enough infrastructure present, you can disassemble it
    yourself and have the materials routed correctly, locally.
    I can only scratch the surface, to show the level of progress.

    As long as the PCBs aren't damaged or burned, they have a market price. Controller boards are sold on ebay for example. Record the drive model
    info carefully, and attach those details to a toe tag fastened to the PCB.
    You are competing against companies that make brand-new replacement
    controller boards, so your asking price cannot be higher than that value.
    Data recovery companies use replacement controllers, while they do their
    work. There are thousands of people who do data recovery as a local ghetto economy thing. There are at least two forums, where those people gather and exchange notes.

    To use a recycled controller, you have to swap the crypto ROM on
    the original board, with the chip on the replacement board. Otherwise,
    a modern drive cannot read the contents, without the correct key.
    Even when FDE is not "engaged", it's effects remain during the
    data recovery process. Which is why the chip must be unsoldered
    and swapped with the original one. Older drives do not contain
    this (nuisance) requirement. All drives achieved FDE capability
    some time ago, but the year that happened, was somewhat later
    than the press release promised.

    The magnets could be sent somewhere, and I think they have
    sufficient value to attract someones attention (even locally).
    They don't just get stuck to the side of the recyclers refrigerator.

    If you want to, you can even mark the drives with a large "X"
    and deposit them at Best Buy. They may be participants in the
    local Take-It-Back program. A few of the big retailers participate
    in the program, and I had about 20 pounds of dry cells recycled
    at a retail store :-) I don't think the staff were pleased to
    see me exactly (because I wasn't buying cellphone minutes), but
    they did agree they were participants, and the materials were
    duly carted to the storage area in back of the store. we pay a retail
    "tax" for this service, and I probably paid $0.50 for some
    USB sticks, for a future time when I will ask the store
    to recycle them for me :-) As if :-)

    At one time, my city government used to document all the
    various "input points" in the recycling system, making it easier
    for you to connect. They don't do this any more. Your
    ability to discover ALL the individuals, is strictly limited.
    I used to have a recycler only ten minutes from the house,
    where I dropped off an old Trinitron monitor, no problem at all.
    Now, there is a condo skyscraper, where the recycling yard
    used to sit. I have no idea, exactly where the next nearest
    one is.

    Paul
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dan Purgert@dan@djph.net to alt.os.linux on Wed May 14 22:15:37 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 2025-05-14, CtrlAltDel wrote:
    [...]
    It just goes on and on and on. I would rather have just converted my HDD drives into SSD's like I originally stated but, I guess that isn't
    possible.

    Why are you so against using a ready-made SSD, and physically swapping
    out the HDD you currently have?
    --
    |_|O|_|
    |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert
    |O|O|O| PGP: DDAB 23FB 19FA 7D85 1CC1 E067 6D65 70E5 4CE7 2860
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Carlos E.R.@robin_listas@es.invalid to alt.os.linux on Thu May 15 02:13:00 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 2025-05-15 00:15, Dan Purgert wrote:
    On 2025-05-14, CtrlAltDel wrote:
    [...]
    It just goes on and on and on. I would rather have just converted my HDD
    drives into SSD's like I originally stated but, I guess that isn't
    possible.

    Why are you so against using a ready-made SSD, and physically swapping
    out the HDD you currently have?

    And both, separately, are recyclable, while the converted disk and the discarded pieces would not be?

    The idea of converting a disk is simply stupid, but we are being very
    polite not to tell the OP.
    --
    Cheers, Carlos.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From evanmac@ciccio@formaggio.org to alt.os.linux on Thu May 15 10:06:12 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    con fecha14 May 2025 y hora 22:51:53 GMT+1, "CtrlAltDel" <Altie@BHam.com> sacó de su cabeza:

    On Wed, 14 May 2025 12:05:53 -0000 (UTC), evanmac wrote:

    con fecha14 May 2025 y hora 09:51:48 GMT+1, "CtrlAltDel"
    <Altie@BHam.com> sacó de su cabeza:

    There is only a finite amount of materials on Planet Earth and we all
    need to do our part to conserve in order to make the world a better
    place. That's how I feel about it, but I'm American and we all think
    like that, whereas many others around the world probably don't.

    american or not, you're definitely a troll...

    Leaving your xenophobic mentality aside, I was only inquiring about
    something I wasn't sure about. That hardly makes me a troll.

    where you read xenophoby in my comment?

    I am xenophobic only with trolls, and you are acting right as one of them
    --
    this is a random signature
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Richard Kettlewell@invalid@invalid.invalid to alt.os.linux on Thu May 15 19:29:45 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> writes:
    On 2025-05-14, CtrlAltDel wrote:
    [...]
    It just goes on and on and on. I would rather have just converted my HDD >> drives into SSD's like I originally stated but, I guess that isn't
    possible.

    Why are you so against using a ready-made SSD, and physically swapping
    out the HDD you currently have?

    He’s not for or against anything, he’s trolling, and very successfully
    so.
    --
    https://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jimmy Anderson@jimmy.anderson@palantirbbs.ddns.net.remove-w2n-this to CtrlAltDel on Sat May 17 22:02:29 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    To: CtrlAltDel
    CtrlAltDel wrote to alt.os.linux <=-

    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    Thanks for the responses, everyone, both genuine and sarcastic. I'm beginning to get the idea that what I wish to do can't be done,
    although I'm still not sure why.

    The thing is, I hate to waste anything. Just think of all the metal and parts and cards and plastic, etc... that will be useless and can't be recycled or anything if I can no longer use the 3 HDD drives I
    currently have.

    Why not find someone that WILL use the HDD's? That way they aren't
    'junked'?


    ... A mind is a terrible thing to ugh... I forgot...
    --- MultiMail/Mac v0.52
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
    Palantir BBS - telnet://palantirbbs.ddns.net
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul@nospam@needed.invalid to alt.os.linux on Sun May 18 09:16:58 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Sat, 5/17/2025 11:02 PM, Jimmy Anderson wrote:
     To: CtrlAltDel
    CtrlAltDel wrote to alt.os.linux <=-

    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    Thanks for the responses, everyone, both genuine and sarcastic. I'm beginning to get the idea that what I wish to do can't be done,
    although I'm still not sure why.

    The thing is, I hate to waste anything. Just think of all the metal and parts and cards and plastic, etc... that will be useless and can't be recycled or anything if I can no longer use the 3 HDD drives I
    currently have.

    Why not find someone that WILL use the HDD's? That way they aren't
    'junked'?


    The S.M.A.R.T table can tell you what shape the drives are in.

    As can a read benchmark.

    "gnome-disks" has a benchmark window for the entire disk drive,
    from the upper right three-ball menu. You're looking for "downward spikes" indicating excess re-allocations, as an indication
    of whether the drive is still suited to main usage.

    I usually deassert the tick box for write benchmark, and only do reads.
    It is hard for me to say whether the benchmarks are accurate. The main
    purpose of running a bench, is to check for "smoothness". There have
    been problems in the past, with more than one benchmark not being
    able to measure speed properly. Some need a bug fix for this.

    [Picture]

    https://i.postimg.cc/BQ5GLTsW/disk-drive-testing.gif

    I sort the drives into three piles.

    1) Unconditional use. Transfer curve is relatively smooth.
    2) Not for regular use. Like the drive in the picture, some
    signs of wear are present.
    3) The third level, is the "close to failure level". The
    downward spikes are 50GB wide, and the slowness of the drive is
    apparent. The "Reallocated" raw data box, is not zero and
    might read 200 or 300. This is a drive with limited
    remaining spare sectors. It still works as well as (2),
    but is just less trustworthy. There could be room for the
    reallocated to show up to 5500, but the application may
    not tolerate the condition of the drive all the way to max.
    It might take "ddrescue" from package "gddrescue", to copy the disk.

    Paul
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Carlos E. R.@robin_listas@es.invalid to alt.os.linux on Sun May 18 18:44:12 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 2025-05-18 15:16, Paul wrote:
    On Sat, 5/17/2025 11:02 PM, Jimmy Anderson wrote:
     To: CtrlAltDel
    CtrlAltDel wrote to alt.os.linux <=-

    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    Thanks for the responses, everyone, both genuine and sarcastic. I'm
    beginning to get the idea that what I wish to do can't be done,
    although I'm still not sure why.

    The thing is, I hate to waste anything. Just think of all the metal and >> Ct> parts and cards and plastic, etc... that will be useless and can't be
    recycled or anything if I can no longer use the 3 HDD drives I
    currently have.

    Why not find someone that WILL use the HDD's? That way they aren't
    'junked'?


    The S.M.A.R.T table can tell you what shape the drives are in.

    As can a read benchmark.

    "gnome-disks" has a benchmark window for the entire disk drive,
    from the upper right three-ball menu. You're looking for "downward spikes" indicating excess re-allocations, as an indication
    of whether the drive is still suited to main usage.

    I usually deassert the tick box for write benchmark, and only do reads.
    It is hard for me to say whether the benchmarks are accurate. The main purpose of running a bench, is to check for "smoothness". There have
    been problems in the past, with more than one benchmark not being
    able to measure speed properly. Some need a bug fix for this.

    [Picture]

    https://i.postimg.cc/BQ5GLTsW/disk-drive-testing.gif

    I sort the drives into three piles.

    1) Unconditional use. Transfer curve is relatively smooth.

    I had not seen this idea of a transfer curve before. Interesting. As
    long as the computer was not busy those instants. The test can take many
    hours to run.
    --
    Cheers,
    Carlos E.R.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul@nospam@needed.invalid to alt.os.linux on Sun May 18 15:40:55 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Sun, 5/18/2025 12:44 PM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
    ) Unconditional use. Transfer curve is relatively smooth.

    I had not seen this idea of a transfer curve before. Interesting.

    As long as the computer was not busy those instants. The test can take many hours to run.


    The benchmarks take tiny samples. The setting for the picture was
    "1000 samples of 10MB each". That means a kind of crude statistical
    sample. if you play with the settings, you might notice the interaction
    between those settings choices, and the amount of "artifacts" in the
    trace.

    I'm only reading a small fraction of the drive surface. I'm taking
    a thousand samples. I hope I hit the track that has the huge
    number of reallocations on it, to get a representative sample.

    I *have* set up a disk before, to bench the whole thing, inch by inch,
    from end to end. That took five hours and a "custom technique" not
    suited for others.

    Any scheme you offer for "vetting" disks, can't particularly
    have a long execution time, as then users won't use it. As long
    as the bench runs in a couple minutes, most people can manage that.

    The thing is, we need to teach people of the need to "vet" disks
    before it is TOO LATE. I hate listening to someone whine about
    their drive full of CRC errors, and their fervent hope all the
    data will be rescued by some miracle. I hope that maybe, maybe,
    just once, someone will follow the instructions to bench a drive,
    and notice it is sick, and get the data off before the disk is ruined.

    It should be noted, that the zone recording scheme of disks,
    has "peculiar behavior". An ex-employee at a disk company, was
    explaining some of this on his web site (until the company lawyers
    detected the leak and shut him down). Some of the disk drives
    you buy *cannot* have smooth edges in the graph. The ripple in
    the transfer rate, is due to how the tracks are set up, and
    the rate on each track can be custom.

    Some drives, just the main zones are visible. Each zone is "flat as
    a straight edge" on top. For those drives, excursions in
    storage performance show up well. The hard drives (even modern
    ones) with "gravel on the edges of the graph", it is then
    harder to spot real/mechanical trouble as a result. The drive
    looks "slightly flaky" from the first day you use it. (And no,
    that is not supposed to be an SMR drive either, it's a PMR
    with gravel on the bench graph.)

    If at first, your two minute bench does not look "pretty",
    try adjusting the number of samples and the sample width, and
    see if that modifies the artifacts from the benching method.

    When hard drives leave the factory, they already have reallocations
    on them. The reason the "Reallocated" SMART parameter is not an
    honest, linear, indicator is because customers would "cherry pick"
    drives and keep sending hard drives back to Newegg, until
    they got a "perfect one". To stop that from happening, the
    Reallocated statistic always reads 0 when the drive leaves
    the factory. This prevents those "special" customers from using
    a precision Reallocated statistic, to cherry pick drives.

    But because the Reallocated statistic is not an honest one,
    we cannot "chart" the health of the drive over its lifetime,
    and plot "reallocations versus time". It is for this reason,
    that I use the read benchmark as a "proxy for surface damage".

    if the disk drive company won't be honest with us, we have to
    come up with some sort of solution for an early warning.

    Paul


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Carlos E. R.@robin_listas@es.invalid to alt.os.linux on Sun May 18 22:41:58 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 2025-05-18 21:40, Paul wrote:
    On Sun, 5/18/2025 12:44 PM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
    ) Unconditional use. Transfer curve is relatively smooth.

    I had not seen this idea of a transfer curve before. Interesting.

    As long as the computer was not busy those instants. The test can take many hours to run.


    The benchmarks take tiny samples. The setting for the picture was
    "1000 samples of 10MB each". That means a kind of crude statistical
    sample. if you play with the settings, you might notice the interaction between those settings choices, and the amount of "artifacts" in the
    trace.

    I'm only reading a small fraction of the drive surface. I'm taking
    a thousand samples. I hope I hit the track that has the huge
    number of reallocations on it, to get a representative sample.

    I *have* set up a disk before, to bench the whole thing, inch by inch,
    from end to end. That took five hours and a "custom technique" not
    suited for others.

    Any scheme you offer for "vetting" disks, can't particularly
    have a long execution time, as then users won't use it. As long
    as the bench runs in a couple minutes, most people can manage that.

    The thing is, we need to teach people of the need to "vet" disks
    before it is TOO LATE. I hate listening to someone whine about
    their drive full of CRC errors, and their fervent hope all the
    data will be rescued by some miracle. I hope that maybe, maybe,
    just once, someone will follow the instructions to bench a drive,
    and notice it is sick, and get the data off before the disk is ruined.

    It should be noted, that the zone recording scheme of disks,
    has "peculiar behavior". An ex-employee at a disk company, was
    explaining some of this on his web site (until the company lawyers
    detected the leak and shut him down). Some of the disk drives
    you buy *cannot* have smooth edges in the graph. The ripple in
    the transfer rate, is due to how the tracks are set up, and
    the rate on each track can be custom.

    Some drives, just the main zones are visible. Each zone is "flat as
    a straight edge" on top. For those drives, excursions in
    storage performance show up well. The hard drives (even modern
    ones) with "gravel on the edges of the graph", it is then
    harder to spot real/mechanical trouble as a result. The drive
    looks "slightly flaky" from the first day you use it. (And no,
    that is not supposed to be an SMR drive either, it's a PMR
    with gravel on the bench graph.)

    If at first, your two minute bench does not look "pretty",
    try adjusting the number of samples and the sample width, and
    see if that modifies the artifacts from the benching method.

    I do the long SMART test. I know it take hours, so I usually do it
    during the night, but I can keep using the computer meanwhile.


    When hard drives leave the factory, they already have reallocations
    on them. The reason the "Reallocated" SMART parameter is not an
    honest, linear, indicator is because customers would "cherry pick"
    drives and keep sending hard drives back to Newegg, until
    they got a "perfect one". To stop that from happening, the
    Reallocated statistic always reads 0 when the drive leaves
    the factory. This prevents those "special" customers from using
    a precision Reallocated statistic, to cherry pick drives.

    Ah. I suspected this, but no one confirmed. It was this way in the past,
    disks came with a sticker listing known bad blocks. It doesn't trouble me.



    But because the Reallocated statistic is not an honest one,
    we cannot "chart" the health of the drive over its lifetime,
    and plot "reallocations versus time". It is for this reason,
    that I use the read benchmark as a "proxy for surface damage".

    Ah. Interesting.

    if the disk drive company won't be honest with us, we have to
    come up with some sort of solution for an early warning.

    At least Seagate disks come now with a very extended logs. In Linux I
    obtained them with "smartctl -d sat -l farm /dev/sdX":

    This is the end part of one:

    Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 0: 0
    Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 1: 0
    Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 2: 0
    Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 3: 0
    Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 4: 0
    Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 5: 0
    Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 6: 0
    Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 7: 0
    Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 8: 0
    Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 9: 0
    Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 0: 0
    Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 1: 0
    Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 2: 0
    Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 3: 0
    Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 4: 0
    Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 5: 0
    Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 6: 0
    Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 7: 0
    Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 8: 0
    Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 9: 0
    --
    Cheers,
    Carlos E.R.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul@nospam@needed.invalid to alt.os.linux on Sun May 18 19:37:57 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Sun, 5/18/2025 4:41 PM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
    On 2025-05-18 21:40, Paul wrote:
    if the disk drive company won't be honest with us, we have to
    come up with some sort of solution for an early warning.

    At least Seagate disks come now with a very extended logs. In Linux I obtained them with "smartctl -d sat -l farm /dev/sdX":

    This is the end part of one:

                    Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 0: 0         Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 1: 0
            Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 2: 0
            Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 3: 0
            Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 4: 0
            Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 5: 0
            Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 6: 0
            Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 7: 0
            Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 8: 0
            Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 9: 0
            Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 0: 0         Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 1: 0         Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 2: 0         Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 3: 0         Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 4: 0         Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 5: 0         Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 6: 0         Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 7: 0         Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 8: 0         Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 9: 0

    OK, added to my notes file.

    That must be a decent capacity disk, to have that many heads.
    Five platters I guess.

    Paul


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul@nospam@needed.invalid to alt.os.linux on Mon May 19 04:47:37 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Sun, 5/18/2025 9:16 AM, Paul wrote:
    On Sat, 5/17/2025 11:02 PM, Jimmy Anderson wrote:
     To: CtrlAltDel
    CtrlAltDel wrote to alt.os.linux <=-

    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    Thanks for the responses, everyone, both genuine and sarcastic. I'm
    beginning to get the idea that what I wish to do can't be done,
    although I'm still not sure why.

    The thing is, I hate to waste anything. Just think of all the metal and >> Ct> parts and cards and plastic, etc... that will be useless and can't be
    recycled or anything if I can no longer use the 3 HDD drives I
    currently have.

    Why not find someone that WILL use the HDD's? That way they aren't
    'junked'?


    The S.M.A.R.T table can tell you what shape the drives are in.

    As can a read benchmark.

    "gnome-disks" has a benchmark window for the entire disk drive,
    from the upper right three-ball menu. You're looking for "downward spikes" indicating excess re-allocations, as an indication
    of whether the drive is still suited to main usage.

    I usually deassert the tick box for write benchmark, and only do reads.
    It is hard for me to say whether the benchmarks are accurate. The main purpose of running a bench, is to check for "smoothness". There have
    been problems in the past, with more than one benchmark not being
    able to measure speed properly. Some need a bug fix for this.

    [Picture]

    https://i.postimg.cc/BQ5GLTsW/disk-drive-testing.gif

    I sort the drives into three piles.

    1) Unconditional use. Transfer curve is relatively smooth.
    2) Not for regular use. Like the drive in the picture, some
    signs of wear are present.
    3) The third level, is the "close to failure level". The
    downward spikes are 50GB wide, and the slowness of the drive is
    apparent. The "Reallocated" raw data box, is not zero and
    might read 200 or 300. This is a drive with limited
    remaining spare sectors. It still works as well as (2),
    but is just less trustworthy. There could be room for the
    reallocated to show up to 5500, but the application may
    not tolerate the condition of the drive all the way to max.
    It might take "ddrescue" from package "gddrescue", to copy the disk.

    Here is the same entire disk, scanned from end to end.
    It does not look so bad after all. Perhaps a little
    spot down near the end. I lost two files on that disk
    due to "CRC errors", which is why I'm not particularly
    happy with it. Other disks don't do that.

    [Picture]

    https://i.postimg.cc/W3Q4srRW/WDBlue-250-GB-Read-Bench.gif

    The conclusion then, is maybe a thorough scan is the better option.

    Paul



    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Carlos E. R.@robin_listas@es.invalid to alt.os.linux on Mon May 19 11:28:57 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 2025-05-19 01:37, Paul wrote:
    On Sun, 5/18/2025 4:41 PM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
    On 2025-05-18 21:40, Paul wrote:
    if the disk drive company won't be honest with us, we have to
    come up with some sort of solution for an early warning.

    At least Seagate disks come now with a very extended logs. In Linux I obtained them with "smartctl -d sat -l farm /dev/sdX":

    This is the end part of one:

                    Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 0: 0 >>         Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 1: 0
            Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 2: 0
            Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 3: 0
            Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 4: 0
            Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 5: 0
            Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 6: 0
            Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 7: 0
            Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 8: 0
            Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 9: 0
            Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 0: 0
            Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 1: 0
            Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 2: 0
            Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 3: 0
            Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 4: 0
            Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 5: 0
            Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 6: 0
            Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 7: 0
            Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 8: 0
            Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 9: 0

    OK, added to my notes file.

    That must be a decent capacity disk, to have that many heads.
    Five platters I guess.

    It is a "Seagate IronWolf Pro NAS 10TB 3.5" SATA 3". I can't believe it
    has that many heads. But it takes 30 seconds to start up, so the
    platters must be heavy, or the motor is current limited.
    --
    Cheers,
    Carlos E.R.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul@nospam@needed.invalid to alt.os.linux on Mon May 19 06:14:36 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Mon, 5/19/2025 5:28 AM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
    On 2025-05-19 01:37, Paul wrote:
    On Sun, 5/18/2025 4:41 PM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
    On 2025-05-18 21:40, Paul wrote:
    if the disk drive company won't be honest with us, we have to
    come up with some sort of solution for an early warning.

    At least Seagate disks come now with a very extended logs. In Linux I obtained them with "smartctl -d sat -l farm /dev/sdX":

    This is the end part of one:

                     Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 0: 0 >>>          Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 1: 0
             Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 2: 0
             Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 3: 0
             Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 4: 0
             Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 5: 0
             Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 6: 0
             Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 7: 0
             Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 8: 0
             Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 9: 0
             Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 0: 0
             Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 1: 0
             Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 2: 0
             Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 3: 0
             Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 4: 0
             Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 5: 0
             Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 6: 0
             Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 7: 0
             Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 8: 0
             Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 9: 0

    OK, added to my notes file.

    That must be a decent capacity disk, to have that many heads.
    Five platters I guess.

    It is a "Seagate IronWolf Pro NAS 10TB 3.5" SATA 3". I can't believe it has that many heads. But it takes 30 seconds to start up, so the platters must be heavy, or the motor is current limited.


    Yeah, current limit. My sample big drive (only an 18TB one), it
    takes a while to spin up, and it also screws around a bit before
    it becomes ready. It's not just loading the firmware off the
    platter (which is the minimal requirement).

    I notice they're allowing drives up to and including 14TB
    to breathe air, and I bet one of those would be slow to start.

    The platters are thinner, when there are a lot of platters
    in there, so they don't have to be as heavy as the platters
    in a four platter drive.

    Paul
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Carlos E. R.@robin_listas@es.invalid to alt.os.linux on Mon May 19 12:22:57 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 2025-05-19 12:14, Paul wrote:
    On Mon, 5/19/2025 5:28 AM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
    On 2025-05-19 01:37, Paul wrote:
    On Sun, 5/18/2025 4:41 PM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
    On 2025-05-18 21:40, Paul wrote:
    if the disk drive company won't be honest with us, we have to
    come up with some sort of solution for an early warning.

    At least Seagate disks come now with a very extended logs. In Linux I obtained them with "smartctl -d sat -l farm /dev/sdX":

    This is the end part of one:

                     Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 0: 0
             Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 1: 0
             Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 2: 0
             Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 3: 0
             Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 4: 0
             Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 5: 0
             Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 6: 0
             Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 7: 0
             Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 8: 0
             Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 9: 0
             Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 0: 0 >>>>          Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 1: 0 >>>>          Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 2: 0 >>>>          Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 3: 0 >>>>          Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 4: 0 >>>>          Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 5: 0 >>>>          Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 6: 0 >>>>          Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 7: 0 >>>>          Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 8: 0 >>>>          Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 9: 0 >>>
    OK, added to my notes file.

    If you want to see the full log, I can post it. I had a look just after purchase, checking to see the disk was actually new.


    That must be a decent capacity disk, to have that many heads.
    Five platters I guess.

    It is a "Seagate IronWolf Pro NAS 10TB 3.5" SATA 3". I can't believe it has that many heads. But it takes 30 seconds to start up, so the platters must be heavy, or the motor is current limited.


    Yeah, current limit. My sample big drive (only an 18TB one), it
    takes a while to spin up, and it also screws around a bit before
    it becomes ready. It's not just loading the firmware off the
    platter (which is the minimal requirement).

    I notice they're allowing drives up to and including 14TB
    to breathe air, and I bet one of those would be slow to start.

    Yes, it is an air breather, I noticed the hole covered with some kind of
    gauze or filter.

    They could just fill with nitrogen, if helium is expensive.


    The platters are thinner, when there are a lot of platters
    in there, so they don't have to be as heavy as the platters
    in a four platter drive.

    I guess. This is not a fridge sized disk, after all :-)
    --
    Cheers,
    Carlos E.R.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul@nospam@needed.invalid to alt.os.linux on Mon May 19 12:05:33 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Mon, 5/19/2025 6:22 AM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
    On 2025-05-19 12:14, Paul wrote:
    On Mon, 5/19/2025 5:28 AM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
    On 2025-05-19 01:37, Paul wrote:
    On Sun, 5/18/2025 4:41 PM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
    On 2025-05-18 21:40, Paul wrote:
    if the disk drive company won't be honest with us, we have to
    come up with some sort of solution for an early warning.

    At least Seagate disks come now with a very extended logs. In Linux I obtained them with "smartctl -d sat -l farm /dev/sdX":

    This is the end part of one:

                      Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 0: 0
              Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 1: 0
              Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 2: 0
              Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 3: 0
              Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 4: 0
              Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 5: 0
              Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 6: 0
              Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 7: 0
              Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 8: 0
              Number of Reallocated Sectors by Head 9: 0
              Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 0: 0 >>>>>           Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 1: 0 >>>>>           Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 2: 0 >>>>>           Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 3: 0 >>>>>           Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 4: 0 >>>>>           Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 5: 0 >>>>>           Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 6: 0 >>>>>           Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 7: 0 >>>>>           Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 8: 0 >>>>>           Number of Reallocation Candidate Sectors by Head 9: 0 >>>>
    OK, added to my notes file.

    If you want to see the full log, I can post it. I had a look just after purchase, checking to see the disk was actually new.


    That must be a decent capacity disk, to have that many heads.
    Five platters I guess.

    It is a "Seagate IronWolf Pro NAS 10TB 3.5" SATA 3". I can't believe it has that many heads. But it takes 30 seconds to start up, so the platters must be heavy, or the motor is current limited.


    Yeah, current limit. My sample big drive (only an 18TB one), it
    takes a while to spin up, and it also screws around a bit before
    it becomes ready. It's not just loading the firmware off the
    platter (which is the minimal requirement).

    I notice they're allowing drives up to and including 14TB
    to breathe air, and I bet one of those would be slow to start.

    Yes, it is an air breather, I noticed the hole covered with some kind of gauze or filter.

    They could just fill with nitrogen, if helium is expensive.


    The platters are thinner, when there are a lot of platters
    in there, so they don't have to be as heavy as the platters
    in a four platter drive.

    I guess. This is not a fridge sized disk, after all :-)



    There was a press release some time ago, indicating they were
    working on thinner platters, in order to squeeze more platters
    into the one inch high drive housings. The thin platters may
    be made of glass, and then the plated-up stack is put on the
    outside.

    *******

    It's a good question why they couldn't use Nitrogen. Or for that
    matter, why the air-HDA could not be sealed. Helium might have a
    different viscosity, and "flying characteristic" for the head,
    which is why the Helium pressure is a bit above atmospheric.

    The air breather drives were supposed to be that way, to avoid
    "tin-canning" of the lid, as barometric pressure changes. The Helium
    drives on the other hand, have two lid plates, one gas-tignt, one
    plate a mechanical reinforcement. If they used a fancy lid, I don't
    see why they couldn't seal the air-based drive. The data recovery
    people aren't going to like it. There have already been some
    joke videos, where they portray their attempts to try to get the lid
    off a Helium drive (welded on), for data recovery.

    It means if you have a Helium drive, and you let it get too old and
    crusty, data recovery might be more difficult (or do-able by fewer
    people), than the air drives that unscrew easily.

    The head stack in a Helium drive, would only have the correct flying
    height under Helium fill to the correct pressure. If the housing
    was filled with air, it is unclear whether you could even make it work
    well with air present. The heads have "lift" and the lift surface
    is scaled according to the gas being used. The "lift" effect counteracts
    the spring constant of the arms. The flying scheme allows the drive
    to run on six-axis.

    Paul
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Carlos E. R.@robin_listas@es.invalid to alt.os.linux on Tue May 20 02:17:13 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 2025-05-19 18:05, Paul wrote:
    On Mon, 5/19/2025 6:22 AM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
    On 2025-05-19 12:14, Paul wrote:
    On Mon, 5/19/2025 5:28 AM, Carlos E. R. wrote:

    ...

    Yes, it is an air breather, I noticed the hole covered with some kind of gauze or filter.

    They could just fill with nitrogen, if helium is expensive.


    The platters are thinner, when there are a lot of platters
    in there, so they don't have to be as heavy as the platters
    in a four platter drive.

    I guess. This is not a fridge sized disk, after all :-)



    There was a press release some time ago, indicating they were
    working on thinner platters, in order to squeeze more platters
    into the one inch high drive housings. The thin platters may
    be made of glass, and then the plated-up stack is put on the
    outside.

    *******

    It's a good question why they couldn't use Nitrogen. Or for that
    matter, why the air-HDA could not be sealed. Helium might have a
    different viscosity, and "flying characteristic" for the head,
    which is why the Helium pressure is a bit above atmospheric.

    The air breather drives were supposed to be that way, to avoid
    "tin-canning" of the lid, as barometric pressure changes. The Helium
    drives on the other hand, have two lid plates, one gas-tignt, one
    plate a mechanical reinforcement. If they used a fancy lid, I don't
    see why they couldn't seal the air-based drive. The data recovery
    people aren't going to like it. There have already been some
    joke videos, where they portray their attempts to try to get the lid
    off a Helium drive (welded on), for data recovery.

    It means if you have a Helium drive, and you let it get too old and
    crusty, data recovery might be more difficult (or do-able by fewer
    people), than the air drives that unscrew easily.

    The head stack in a Helium drive, would only have the correct flying
    height under Helium fill to the correct pressure. If the housing
    was filled with air, it is unclear whether you could even make it work
    well with air present. The heads have "lift" and the lift surface
    is scaled according to the gas being used. The "lift" effect counteracts
    the spring constant of the arms. The flying scheme allows the drive
    to run on six-axis.

    They might even use hydrogen. It is a similar density to helium but far
    easier to obtain. Yes, it is flammable, but there is not that much gas,
    and it is sealed.

    Well, welding is a problem, though :-DD
    --
    Cheers,
    Carlos E.R.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From jjb@jjb@invalid.invalid to alt.os.linux on Tue May 20 11:44:13 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 20-05-2025 02:17, Carlos E. R. wrote:
    On 2025-05-19 18:05, Paul wrote:
    On Mon, 5/19/2025 6:22 AM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
    On 2025-05-19 12:14, Paul wrote:
    On Mon, 5/19/2025 5:28 AM, Carlos E. R. wrote:

    ...

    Yes, it is an air breather, I noticed the hole covered with some kind
    of gauze or filter.

    They could just fill with nitrogen, if helium is expensive.


    The platters are thinner, when there are a lot of platters
    in there, so they don't have to be as heavy as the platters
    in a four platter drive.

    I guess. This is not a fridge sized disk, after all :-)



    There was a press release some time ago, indicating they were
    working on thinner platters, in order to squeeze more platters
    into the one inch high drive housings. The thin platters may
    be made of glass, and then the plated-up stack is put on the
    outside.

    *******

    It's a good question why they couldn't use Nitrogen. Or for that
    matter, why the air-HDA could not be sealed. Helium might have a
    different viscosity, and "flying characteristic" for the head,
    which is why the Helium pressure is a bit above atmospheric.

    The air breather drives were supposed to be that way, to avoid
    "tin-canning" of the lid, as barometric pressure changes. The Helium
    drives on the other hand, have two lid plates, one gas-tignt, one
    plate a mechanical reinforcement. If they used a fancy lid, I don't
    see why they couldn't seal the air-based drive. The data recovery
    people aren't going to like it. There have already been some
    joke videos, where they portray their attempts to try to get the lid
    off a Helium drive (welded on), for data recovery.

    It means if you have a Helium drive, and you let it get too old and
    crusty, data recovery might be more difficult (or do-able by fewer
    people), than the air drives that unscrew easily.

    The head stack in a Helium drive, would only have the correct flying
    height under Helium fill to the correct pressure. If the housing
    was filled with air, it is unclear whether you could even make it work
    well with air present. The heads have "lift" and the lift surface
    is scaled according to the gas being used. The "lift" effect counteracts
    the spring constant of the arms. The flying scheme allows the drive
    to run on six-axis.

    They might even use hydrogen. It is a similar density to helium but far easier to obtain. Yes, it is flammable, but there is not that much gas,
    and it is sealed.

    Well, welding is a problem, though :-DD

    The problem with hydrogen might be that it diffuses easily in/through materials. In the long run it might affect the pressure within. It
    also makes metals brittle.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Carlos E. R.@robin_listas@es.invalid to alt.os.linux on Tue May 20 13:00:20 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 2025-05-20 11:44, jjb wrote:
    On 20-05-2025 02:17, Carlos E. R. wrote:
    On 2025-05-19 18:05, Paul wrote:

    ...

    They might even use hydrogen. It is a similar density to helium but
    far easier to obtain. Yes, it is flammable, but there is not that much
    gas, and it is sealed.

    Well, welding is a problem, though :-DD

     The problem with hydrogen might be that it diffuses easily in/through materials.  In the long run it might affect the pressure within.  It
    also makes metals brittle.

    Helium should also diffuse easily, no? But hydrogen reacts, helium doesn't.
    --
    Cheers,
    Carlos E.R.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John Hasler@john@sugarbit.com to alt.os.linux on Tue May 20 07:12:43 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    "Carlos E. R." writes:
    Helium should also diffuse easily, no? But hydrogen reacts, helium
    doesn't.

    Low temperature hydrogen embrittlement primarily affects high strength
    or hardened steels. It does not affect aluminum and copper.
    --
    John Hasler
    john@sugarbit.com
    Dancing Horse Hill
    Elmwood, WI USA
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul@nospam@needed.invalid to alt.os.linux on Tue May 20 22:27:47 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Tue, 5/20/2025 8:12 AM, John Hasler wrote:
    "Carlos E. R." writes:
    Helium should also diffuse easily, no? But hydrogen reacts, helium
    doesn't.

    Low temperature hydrogen embrittlement primarily affects high strength
    or hardened steels. It does not affect aluminum and copper.


    It wouldn't be my first choice of gases.

    Likely to be cheaper though.

    The people at the plant wouldn't like that.
    Too much excitement.

    Paul

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CtrlAltDel@Altie@BHam.com to alt.os.linux on Mon May 26 20:34:46 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    I wanted to come back and update everyone on what options I chose. To help save Mother Earth and to create no more waste and to purchase no more
    clutter from capitalists to foul up our air and water, my brother-in-law
    gave me some of his old SSD's he was no longer using.

    That was a big plus because no more animals had to die from pollution that
    it takes to create computer equipment.

    To not be a contributor to the destruction of our precious planet, I have found a way to re-purpose the old HDD's I had. I am using one of them as
    a doorstop for a hallway door in my home that always closes about halfway without something to stop it.

    For another one, I took a ball-peen hammer and beat on it just a little
    bit and created an indentation in the case. Then, being the resourceful person I am, I took an antique chair that was never quite level and placed
    one if its legs into that indentation and it perfectly leveled the chair.

    Now I am happy, my old computer runs faster, and Gaia knows that I am offsetting the harm that is caused by the rich and famous celebrities who
    fly around in jets all day, every day, 365 days a year.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dan Purgert@dan@djph.net to alt.os.linux on Tue May 27 10:11:55 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 2025-05-26, CtrlAltDel wrote:
    I wanted to come back and update everyone on what options I chose. To help save Mother Earth and to create no more waste and to purchase no more clutter from capitalists to foul up our air and water, my brother-in-law gave me some of his old SSD's he was no longer using.

    Here's hoping they weren't abused too much, and they last a while.
    --
    |_|O|_|
    |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert
    |O|O|O| PGP: DDAB 23FB 19FA 7D85 1CC1 E067 6D65 70E5 4CE7 2860
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul@nospam@needed.invalid to alt.os.linux on Tue May 27 09:39:27 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Tue, 5/27/2025 6:11 AM, Dan Purgert wrote:
    On 2025-05-26, CtrlAltDel wrote:
    I wanted to come back and update everyone on what options I chose. To help >> save Mother Earth and to create no more waste and to purchase no more
    clutter from capitalists to foul up our air and water, my brother-in-law
    gave me some of his old SSD's he was no longer using.

    Here's hoping they weren't abused too much, and they last a while.

    Using the SMART data about total LBA used, you can figure out
    the device life and how much remains.

    [Picture]

    https://i.postimg.cc/XvCS1J4t/10-of-2400-TBW-Used.gif

    I have 2390 of 2400 TBW remaining for drive life,
    and the SSD will outlast me.

    The last backup made of that drive, was ten months ago, and
    I just finished a backup one hour ago. The backups go onto
    hard drives :-)

    As for the observation that storage companies are money grubbing
    bastards, you have to remember that a large number of them
    failed up and went out of business. The ones that remain, are
    the "survivors", who get it.

    They don't really like charging $600 for hard drives, because
    you hardly sell any at all at that price. The one that is on
    offer right now for $110, it's a stinker of a drive (SMR),
    but I bet the public will buy those and hold their nose.
    You don't use SMR (shingled) drives as boot drives. They
    work best for holding large backup files (partimage).

    Paul
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From evanmac@ciccio@formaggio.org to alt.os.linux on Tue May 27 19:44:45 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    con fecha26 May 2025 y hora 21:34:46 GMT+1, "CtrlAltDel" <Altie@BHam.com> sacó de su cabeza:

    [cut]
    Now I am happy
    [cut]

    You're definitely a troll... or a total idiot
    --
    this is a random signature
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CtrlAltDel@Altie@BHam.com to alt.os.linux on Tue May 27 22:18:14 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Tue, 27 May 2025 10:11:55 -0000 (UTC), Dan Purgert wrote:

    On 2025-05-26, CtrlAltDel wrote:
    I wanted to come back and update everyone on what options I chose. To
    help save Mother Earth and to create no more waste and to purchase no
    more clutter from capitalists to foul up our air and water, my
    brother-in-law gave me some of his old SSD's he was no longer using.

    Here's hoping they weren't abused too much, and they last a while.

    My niece had glued the feet of a barbie doll to one of them and was using
    it as a stand for the doll. I just scraped the glue off with a pocket
    knife and it seems to work fine.

    The other one, she had used finger nail polish to paint flowers and grass
    on, but I just used some polish remover to get all that off with and it
    seems okay too.

    She's only 10 years old and I could tell she was a little upset I was
    taking her toys away. To compensate for that, I told her I would whittle
    her some wood sticks so she could build a little house for her pet
    hamster.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul@nospam@needed.invalid to alt.os.linux on Tue May 27 18:51:17 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Tue, 5/27/2025 6:18 PM, CtrlAltDel wrote:
    On Tue, 27 May 2025 10:11:55 -0000 (UTC), Dan Purgert wrote:

    On 2025-05-26, CtrlAltDel wrote:
    I wanted to come back and update everyone on what options I chose. To
    help save Mother Earth and to create no more waste and to purchase no
    more clutter from capitalists to foul up our air and water, my
    brother-in-law gave me some of his old SSD's he was no longer using.

    Here's hoping they weren't abused too much, and they last a while.

    My niece had glued the feet of a barbie doll to one of them and was using
    it as a stand for the doll. I just scraped the glue off with a pocket
    knife and it seems to work fine.

    The other one, she had used finger nail polish to paint flowers and grass on, but I just used some polish remover to get all that off with and it seems okay too.

    She's only 10 years old and I could tell she was a little upset I was
    taking her toys away. To compensate for that, I told her I would whittle her some wood sticks so she could build a little house for her pet
    hamster.


    If this is a problem, remember that the metal cases unscrew. and inside
    is an autonomous PCB that works without the case being present.

    https://images.anandtech.com/doci/16480/IMGP9045_575px.jpg

    If operating the PCB without the covers on it, you would need to be
    careful that any active circuitry does not touch a chassis ground. That
    means using the tiny cable ties, the nylon ones and arranging the SSD
    PCB so it does not touch anything. a lot of cases, just don't have
    the convenient mount-points to do that.

    Some SSDs have plastic bodies.

    Some are metal (and the metal is at ground potential).

    The metal ones made from a sheet steel, some of those scratch
    very easily and can be cosmetically damaged such that the store
    won't accept them as a return (open box) item unless they are
    in mint-condition. Such drives are to be avoided, from a warranty or
    return perspective, because they scratch way too easily. If you
    screw one of those drives into the laptop metal tray, that scratches
    up the paint too.

    On some, the screws are in obvious locations and one
    of the screws is covered with an anti-tamper sticker (Intel).
    On others, it's possible the generous-sized label covers the screw
    that holds the two case halves together.

    Paul
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CtrlAltDel@Altie@BHam.com to alt.os.linux on Wed May 28 07:14:19 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Tue, 27 May 2025 18:51:17 -0400, Paul wrote:


    If this is a problem, remember that the metal cases unscrew. and inside
    is an autonomous PCB that works without the case being present.

    https://images.anandtech.com/doci/16480/IMGP9045_575px.jpg

    If operating the PCB without the covers on it, you would need to be
    careful that any active circuitry does not touch a chassis ground. That
    means using the tiny cable ties, the nylon ones and arranging the SSD
    PCB so it does not touch anything. a lot of cases, just don't have the convenient mount-points to do that.

    Some SSDs have plastic bodies.

    Some are metal (and the metal is at ground potential).

    The metal ones made from a sheet steel, some of those scratch very
    easily and can be cosmetically damaged such that the store won't accept
    them as a return (open box) item unless they are in mint-condition. Such drives are to be avoided, from a warranty or return perspective, because
    they scratch way too easily. If you screw one of those drives into the
    laptop metal tray, that scratches up the paint too.

    On some, the screws are in obvious locations and one of the screws is
    covered with an anti-tamper sticker (Intel).
    On others, it's possible the generous-sized label covers the screw that
    holds the two case halves together.

    Thanks, Paul. They are in plastic cases and work fine, so I got lucky in
    that regard. I don't think I'll be trying to return them as I didn't buy
    them and the receipts of purchase are long gone.

    The only think I'm worried about now is that my niece, Nadine, is acting
    kind of sad because I took her toys away. I told here I was whittling some sticks for her to make a hamster house with but, I don't think that
    impressed her too much.

    I'm thinking about giving her my penny collection I've been collecting
    from all my spare change for the last year. I would guess there is at
    least 30 dollars worth of pennies in the jug.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul@nospam@needed.invalid to alt.os.linux on Wed May 28 12:11:05 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Wed, 5/28/2025 3:14 AM, CtrlAltDel wrote:


    I'm thinking about giving her my penny collection I've been collecting
    from all my spare change for the last year. I would guess there is at
    least 30 dollars worth of pennies in the jug.


    When I took thirty years of change to the bank, it
    amounted to around $1500. The requirement to roll
    the submitted coins, is why nobody normally takes them back
    to the bank. When they got a sorting machine for coins,
    I dumped my entire collection. You never know how much
    money is tied up in change, until you redeem it.

    You could buy a lot of Barbie dolls with $1500.

    Paul
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CtrlAltDel@Altie@BHam.com to alt.os.linux on Wed May 28 19:53:04 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Wed, 28 May 2025 12:11:05 -0400, Paul wrote:

    On Wed, 5/28/2025 3:14 AM, CtrlAltDel wrote:


    I'm thinking about giving her my penny collection I've been collecting
    from all my spare change for the last year. I would guess there is at
    least 30 dollars worth of pennies in the jug.


    When I took thirty years of change to the bank, it amounted to around
    $1500. The requirement to roll the submitted coins, is why nobody
    normally takes them back to the bank. When they got a sorting machine
    for coins,
    I dumped my entire collection. You never know how much money is tied up
    in change, until you redeem it.

    You could buy a lot of Barbie dolls with $1500.

    Yeah, but by the time I save up 30 years worth of coins to gift her with, she'd be 40 years old. Another idea I had was to give here a perfectly
    good wooden pallet I have stored.

    She sleeps on a mattress on the floor. She could put the pallet
    underneath the mattress and it would be practically the same as a set of
    box springs.

    It's not that exciting for a young girl but, it would do her more good
    than she would realize. She would be off the cold floor, separated from crawling insects, and she could use the space beneath the pallet for
    storage of sorts.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2