• Re: ada to java

    From =?UTF-8?Q?Niocl=C3=A1is=C3=ADn_C=C3=B3il=C3=ADn_de_Ghlost=C3=A9ir?=@Spamassassin@irrt.De to comp.lang.ada,comp.compilers.tools.javacc on Wed Aug 13 15:27:53 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.lang.ada

    On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Ed Trubia wrote:
    "Looking for a grammar / parser that will allow me to convert ada to java.
    I
    have a very large ada program, that for the most part needs to converted to java. Jgnat is not an option because of our operating environment.

    Anything available.

    Thanks in advance,
    Ed Trubia"


    I do not believe that it itself "needs to converted to
    java"!
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Von Ottone@pnn@pnn.org to comp.lang.ada,comp.compilers.tools.javacc on Wed Aug 13 15:58:24 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.lang.ada

    On Wed, 13 Aug 2025 15:27:53 +0200, Niocláisín Cóilín de Ghlostéir <Spamassassin@irrt.De> wrote:

    On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Ed Trubia wrote:
    "Looking for a grammar / parser that will allow me to convert ada to java.
    I
    have a very large ada program, that for the most part needs to converted to >java. Jgnat is not an option because of our operating environment.

    Anything available.

    Thanks in advance,
    Ed Trubia"


    I do not believe that it itself "needs to converted to
    java"!

    Right. Java is evil.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?Niocl=C3=A1is=C3=ADn_C=C3=B3il=C3=ADn_de_Ghlost=C3=A9ir?=@Spamassassin@irrt.De to comp.lang.ada,comp.compilers.tools.javacc on Wed Aug 13 16:07:45 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.lang.ada

    On Wed, 13 Aug 2025, Von Ottone wrote:
    "Java is evil."

    Thanks for replying, but, well, I do not go so far as to accuse so!
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Von Ottone@pnn@pnn.org to comp.lang.ada,comp.compilers.tools.javacc on Wed Aug 13 16:41:04 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.lang.ada

    On Wed, 13 Aug 2025 16:07:45 +0200, Niocláisín Cóilín de Ghlostéir <Spamassassin@irrt.De> wrote:

    On Wed, 13 Aug 2025, Von Ottone wrote:
    "Java is evil."

    Thanks for replying, but, well, I do not go so far as to accuse so!

    When the web was only html, 30 years ago, things worked smooth. Now
    the internet is a bedlam with all those "active content" websites,
    they are vectors for cruel cyberattacks.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?Niocl=C3=A1is=C3=ADn_C=C3=B3il=C3=ADn_de_Ghlost=C3=A9ir?=@Spamassassin@irrt.De to comp.lang.ada,comp.compilers.tools.javacc on Wed Aug 13 17:17:39 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.lang.ada

    On Wed, 13 Aug 2025, Von Ottone wrote:
    "Right. Java is evil."

    An amusing comp.lang.java.programmer article has Headers
    Subject: Re: constructor with more than 255 params
    and
    Message-ID: <1127383390.117229.283330@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
    References: <dgtn42$531@netnews.net.lucent.com>
    <sdq4j151n19sas3ed1j9tqa5st295kdirf@4ax.com>
    by Hemal Pandya . . .
    "Roedy Green wrote:
    [...]

    Alternatively, put the parameter info into a Collection, perhaps a
    HashMap of name=value pairs and pass in the Collection.

    All very good advice. But instead of using the evil data structure
    HashMap you might find the named parameter indiom useful: http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/ctors.html#faq-10.18
    "

    Ada is absolutely better as normal.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Keith Thompson@Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com to comp.lang.ada,comp.compilers.tools.javacc on Wed Aug 13 13:57:36 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.lang.ada

    Niocláisín Cóilín de Ghlostéir <Spamassassin@irrt.De> writes:
    On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Ed Trubia wrote:
    "Looking for a grammar / parser that will allow me to convert ada to
    java. I
    have a very large ada program, that for the most part needs to converted to java. Jgnat is not an option because of our operating environment.

    Anything available.

    Thanks in advance,
    Ed Trubia"


    I do not believe that it itself "needs to converted to
    java"!

    You are replying to an article from 2003.

    The universal Usenet convention is to mark quoted text with "> " on
    each line, not to surround it with quotation marks. Your newsreader
    should do this automatically. It makes it easier for others to read
    your posts.
    --
    Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
    void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2