• Re: Does a Prologer know web 1.0 from web 2.0? (Was: Interview withan Emacs Enthusiast [Colorized])

    From Tristan Wibberley@tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk to comp.lang.prolog on Thu Nov 20 18:38:13 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.lang.prolog

    On 14/06/2025 22:11, Mild Shock wrote:
    escape output as well. In as far it doesn’t belong to
    web 1.0, which deals more with static content. People
    were limited to passively viewing content. It rather
    belongs to web 2.0, and is substantially different


    web 2 is web 0.5

    web 1 was better. anyone could pay £10 a year or less to put up
    important content. Now they pay nothing to swamp me in slop and they all individually go insane as they do.

    If prolog helps web 1 and hinders web 2 then god bless it.
    --
    Tristan Wibberley

    The message body is Copyright (C) 2025 Tristan Wibberley except
    citations and quotations noted. All Rights Reserved except that you may,
    of course, cite it academically giving credit to me, distribute it
    verbatim as part of a usenet system or its archives, and use it to
    promote my greatness and general superiority without misrepresentation
    of my opinions other than my opinion of my greatness and general
    superiority which you _may_ misrepresent. You definitely MAY NOT train
    any production AI system with it but you may train experimental AI that
    will only be used for evaluation of the AI methods it implements.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2