From Newsgroup: comp.mobile.ipad

On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 03:26:45 -0000 (UTC), Marion wrote :

Then you agree that battery capacity will be the biggest determinant of the >>> life of a mobile device given comparison of two devices of equal output.

I do not.

Two devices of essentially equal wattage, but one has a battery capacity
half the other, will reach EOL sooner, even if Apple puts its logo on that lower capacity device.

Typo...

Two devices of essentially equal wattage, but one has a battery capacity
half the other, it's basic math that the smaller battery device will always reach EOL sooner, even if Apple puts its logo on that lower capacity
device.

Chris' claim that an Apple logo alone makes an Apple screen thousands of
times more efficient (or some huge percentage), is patently absurd.

Apple doesn't make their screens.
Samsung, LG and BOE do.

And they sell those same screens to other manufacturers.
Apple doesn't gain magical efficiency simply by slapping a logo on them.

Chris' claim the Apple logo alone confers immense efficiency, is absurd.
(Chris can't deny that's his claim because that's basically his argument!)
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.mobile.ipad

On 2025-06-05 20:31, Marion wrote:

On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 03:26:45 -0000 (UTC), Marion wrote :

Then you agree that battery capacity will be the biggest determinant of the
life of a mobile device given comparison of two devices of equal output. >>>

I do not.

Two devices of essentially equal wattage, but one has a battery capacity
half the other, will reach EOL sooner, even if Apple puts its logo on that >> lower capacity device.

iOS devices don't have essentially equal power consumption...

...AND they have batteries that are much larger than "half the other".

Typo...

Two devices of essentially equal wattage, but one has a battery capacity
half the other, it's basic math that the smaller battery device will always reach EOL sooner, even if Apple puts its logo on that lower capacity
device.

Chris' claim that an Apple logo alone makes an Apple screen thousands of times more efficient (or some huge percentage), is patently absurd.

Apple doesn't make their screens.
Samsung, LG and BOE do.

And they sell those same screens to other manufacturers.
Apple doesn't gain magical efficiency simply by slapping a logo on them.

Chris' claim the Apple logo alone confers immense efficiency, is absurd. (Chris can't deny that's his claim because that's basically his argument!)

Apple makes it's own processors...

...and they are known for being more power efficient than pretty much
any other similar processor.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.mobile.ipad

On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 20:55:53 -0700, Alan wrote:

...and they are known for being more power efficient than pretty much
any other similar processor.

B U L L S H I T

Who told you that?
Apple marketing?

Where does Apple say how much more efficient the device is?
That's because it's B-U-L-L-S-H-I-T!

Without a number directly from Apple, you're repeating B-U-L-L-S-H-I-T!

Give us all an actual efficiency number from Apple.

Nobody else.
From Apple.

It doesn't exist.
Because it's B-U-L-L-S-H-I-T!

Anything you claim that is not directly from Apple is meaningless.
What percentage efficiency does Apple claim?

Look it up.
Apple makes no such numerical claim.

Because it's BULLSHIT!
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.mobile.ipad

On 2025-06-05 22:02, Bill Powell wrote:

On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 20:55:53 -0700, Alan wrote:

...and they are known for being more power efficient than pretty much
any other similar processor.

B U L L S H I T

Who told you that?
Apple marketing?

Where does Apple say how much more efficient the device is?
That's because it's B-U-L-L-S-H-I-T!

Without a number directly from Apple, you're repeating B-U-L-L-S-H-I-T!

Why must the number come "directly from Apple"?

So you can then claim it's just marketing lies?

Give us all an actual efficiency number from Apple.

Nobody else.
From Apple.

It doesn't exist.
Because it's B-U-L-L-S-H-I-T!

Anything you claim that is not directly from Apple is meaningless.
What percentage efficiency does Apple claim?

Look it up.
Apple makes no such numerical claim.

Because it's BULLSHIT!

<https://www.cpu-monkey.com/en/cpu_benchmark-cpu_performance_per_watt>

That's for personal computer processors, but can you please tell me what processors top that list?

What? Don't want to say?

:-)

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.mobile.ipad

On 2025-06-06 05:02:45 +0000, Bill Powell said:

On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 20:55:53 -0700, Alan wrote:

...and they are known for being more power efficient than pretty much
any other similar processor.

B U L L S H I T

Who told you that?
Apple marketing?

<snip>

Another braindead / namechange troll for the killfile. :-\

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2