• AnduinOS

    From RonB@ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Wed Aug 20 07:01:08 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    Never heard of AnduinOS until yesterday. It's a distribution, based on
    Ubuntu, that is designed to look and work (sort of) like Windows 11. No Snap included by default, but FlatPak comes preloaded. It was developed by a Microsoft Employee (who has now been laid off — as of the end of July).

    I actually like it. It won't replace Linux Mint, but it's small, comes with
    a good selection of applications (but no Office suite, I guess you choose
    one yourself, if you want it). It installs quickly (about 10 minutes, which includes the updates). It uses a highly modified Gnome desktop and defaults
    to Wayland (which seems to work well even on my older computers). What
    really impresses is the attitude of its developer Anduin Xu, a Chinese developer. It's currently No. 13 on Distrowatch.

    What he writes about it (very long)...

    Story behind AnduinOS - A letter from Anduin

    I’m Anduin, the sole maintainer of AnduinOS.

    Recently, I noticed by chance that AnduinOS made it onto Distrowatch's
    trending list. Additionally, my server is overwhelmed daily by numerous
    multithreaded downloads, which left me astonished, wondering how I
    possibly deserved this attention. After reviewing community feedback and
    comments, I felt inclined to share more about the system's development
    journey and its background, and also to engage with the community more
    thoroughly.

    https://distrowatch.com/dwres.php?resource=trending

    First, yes, I am indeed a Microsoft employee. (Update 2025-07-20: Not
    anymore. I got laid off this month and will leave Microsoft soon.) I work
    full-time at Microsoft as an engineer, though my work isn't related to
    Windows. Thus, my financial situation is stable, and I currently have no
    plans to commercialize this project. Fundamentally, AnduinOS isn't meant
    to be a commercial endeavor anyway. It was simply a toy and practice
    exercise I put together during a leisurely afternoon.

    I often immerse myself in developing one-click configuration
    scripts—something many Linux enthusiasts do—because manually customizing
    a freshly installed system to match personal preferences is quite
    tedious. Typically, it takes me at least half an hour to repeatedly
    adjust settings. Naturally, at Microsoft, I use Windows daily. I find
    that Windows' interaction logic is highly efficient; unfortunately, its
    shell tends to crash frequently, and it's filled with intrusive
    advertisements.

    On the other hand, Linux's freedom allows almost limitless customization.
    In my spare time, I exclusively use Linux and write various automation
    scripts. My friends and I frequently exchange our automated initial
    configuration scripts. Being an Arch and NixOS user has consistently
    reminded me of the value of building from scratch while maintaining an
    awareness of past actions.

    Creating a distribution turned out to be not particularly difficult.
    Indeed, every NixOS and Gentoo user essentially becomes their own distro
    creator, utilizing formal languages to precisely describe the desired
    system configuration and aiming for a nearly "stateless" personal device.

    With this idea, I realized I could simply modify Ubuntu's official ISO,
    recompress it, and create a personalized distribution. Many criticized
    AnduinOS as involving minimal effort—essentially just changing a theme.
    But that’s precisely the effect I intended. I’m essentially just an
    ordinary Ubuntu user looking for a comfortable Linux experience in my
    spare time, nothing more. Interestingly, many others consider this
    minimal alteration an advantage, as AnduinOS explicitly identifies itself
    as Ubuntu in its /etc/os-release file. It is Ubuntu, intentionally
    avoiding introducing new concepts, leveraging Ubuntu’s extensive
    ecosystem and community knowledge.

    Of course, I eventually delved deeper into Debian's build toolchain, like
    using debootstrap. AnduinOS's source is more like an integrative wrapper
    allowing users to insert their own logos, dconf configurations, and
    generate their customized ISOs. I’m proud it has a convenient builder
    that's relatively easy to maintain.

    Thus, AnduinOS hasn't required significant effort from me—it’s a hobby
    project I tend to during my leisure time (many know my primary job is
    developing .NET applications). Curiously, my main job often remains
    unnoticed, while my hobby projects unexpectedly thrive. Ironically, my
    most starred project is a recipe.

    I'm genuinely surprised and grateful for the community's acknowledgment
    and interest in AnduinOS. I suspect its "success" lies precisely in the
    minimal changes—it’s merely Ubuntu dressed in a Windows theme, and that
    piques curiosity. I recognize this success may be fleeting and should not
    make me overly proud. After all, I’m standing on the shoulders of giants;
    numerous significant problems have already been solved, and I’m merely
    packaging and integrating existing solutions.

    Initially, I didn't even pre-install an app store, and many criticized
    this decision. Some people speculated excessively about my motives, but
    the truth was simple—I didn't need it personally. As I mentioned, this
    ISO was just something quickly put together for my own use, later shared
    casually with the community. It perfectly suited my personal needs, and
    that's all I wanted. Now, it comes pre-installed with Flatpak, aligning
    with my requirements. While Flatpak introduces its own challenges (like
    file access restrictions), it conveniently isolates applications whose
    behaviors I can't fully predict.

    I’ve learned a great deal about package management through this project,
    notably that apt, rpm, flatpak, snap, and appimage all fail to perfectly
    solve dependency issues and reproducibility problems. I continue to hold
    Nix in high esteem. Perhaps, if I ever fully adopt Nix, I'll utilize it
    to create my own OS.

    Many have asked why I don’t accept donations, how I profit, and if I plan
    to commercialize AnduinOS. Truthfully, I haven't thoroughly considered
    these issues. It's not my main job, and I don’t plan to rely on it for a
    living. Each month, I dedicate only a few hours to maintaining it.
    Perhaps in the future, I might consider providing enterprise solutions
    based on AnduinOS, but I won’t compromise its original simplicity. It has
    always been about providing myself with a comfortably themed Ubuntu.

    Amid the unpredictable global dynamics, I often feel I could lose my job
    anytime due to constantly changing U.S.-China relations. However, losing
    a job doesn't greatly concern me. As an engineer, the worst outcome would
    be spending a few months practicing algorithmic questions for job
    interviews. Additionally, AnduinOS might allow me to offer enterprise
    technical support or develop custom hardware—there are always
    opportunities to generate income. Some venture capitalists have expressed
    interest, but I've generally declined, reiterating that this is merely a
    hobby with no commercial future.

    I've also noticed criticism labeling AnduinOS as malicious, claiming it
    spies for the Chinese government. I find conspiracy theorists impossible
    to communicate with, as conspiracies are unfalsifiable by design.
    Nonetheless, since the source code is openly available, users can compile
    identical ISOs themselves. Embedding backdoors would be irrational and
    easily exposed.

    Certainly, AnduinOS is very new, immature, and maintained solely by me,
    leading to understandable concerns about potential abandonment or
    unresolved bugs. However, considering my stable lifestyle and the modest
    maintenance effort required, I intend to continue supporting it. If
    sponsorship or corporate cooperation emerges, perhaps I could even
    dedicate myself full-time.

    Interestingly, the engaging story of AnduinOS demonstrates that an OS
    maintained casually in spare time may hold more attraction. Precisely
    because it’s a hobby—not commercial—there's no incentive to incorporate
    undesirable elements. My primary goal is simply to maintain this original
    intent.

    Thanks to everyone for your support!

    https://news.anduinos.com/post/2025/5/6/story-behind-anduinos-a-letter-from-anduin
    --
    Definition of Insanity: Thinking you can
    beat the Bear on his own territory.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CrudeSausage@crude@sausa.ge to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Wed Aug 20 08:21:53 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2025-08-20 3:01 a.m., RonB wrote:
    Never heard of AnduinOS until yesterday. It's a distribution, based on Ubuntu, that is designed to look and work (sort of) like Windows 11. No Snap included by default, but FlatPak comes preloaded. It was developed by a Microsoft Employee (who has now been laid off — as of the end of July).

    I actually like it. It won't replace Linux Mint, but it's small, comes with
    a good selection of applications (but no Office suite, I guess you choose
    one yourself, if you want it). It installs quickly (about 10 minutes, which includes the updates). It uses a highly modified Gnome desktop and defaults to Wayland (which seems to work well even on my older computers). What
    really impresses is the attitude of its developer Anduin Xu, a Chinese developer. It's currently No. 13 on Distrowatch.

    What he writes about it (very long)...

    Story behind AnduinOS - A letter from Anduin

    I’m Anduin, the sole maintainer of AnduinOS.

    Recently, I noticed by chance that AnduinOS made it onto Distrowatch's
    trending list. Additionally, my server is overwhelmed daily by numerous
    multithreaded downloads, which left me astonished, wondering how I
    possibly deserved this attention. After reviewing community feedback and
    comments, I felt inclined to share more about the system's development
    journey and its background, and also to engage with the community more
    thoroughly.

    https://distrowatch.com/dwres.php?resource=trending

    First, yes, I am indeed a Microsoft employee. (Update 2025-07-20: Not
    anymore. I got laid off this month and will leave Microsoft soon.) I work
    full-time at Microsoft as an engineer, though my work isn't related to
    Windows. Thus, my financial situation is stable, and I currently have no
    plans to commercialize this project. Fundamentally, AnduinOS isn't meant
    to be a commercial endeavor anyway. It was simply a toy and practice
    exercise I put together during a leisurely afternoon.

    I often immerse myself in developing one-click configuration
    scripts—something many Linux enthusiasts do—because manually customizing
    a freshly installed system to match personal preferences is quite
    tedious. Typically, it takes me at least half an hour to repeatedly
    adjust settings. Naturally, at Microsoft, I use Windows daily. I find
    that Windows' interaction logic is highly efficient; unfortunately, its
    shell tends to crash frequently, and it's filled with intrusive
    advertisements.

    On the other hand, Linux's freedom allows almost limitless customization.
    In my spare time, I exclusively use Linux and write various automation
    scripts. My friends and I frequently exchange our automated initial
    configuration scripts. Being an Arch and NixOS user has consistently
    reminded me of the value of building from scratch while maintaining an
    awareness of past actions.

    Creating a distribution turned out to be not particularly difficult.
    Indeed, every NixOS and Gentoo user essentially becomes their own distro
    creator, utilizing formal languages to precisely describe the desired
    system configuration and aiming for a nearly "stateless" personal device.

    With this idea, I realized I could simply modify Ubuntu's official ISO,
    recompress it, and create a personalized distribution. Many criticized
    AnduinOS as involving minimal effort—essentially just changing a theme.
    But that’s precisely the effect I intended. I’m essentially just an
    ordinary Ubuntu user looking for a comfortable Linux experience in my
    spare time, nothing more. Interestingly, many others consider this
    minimal alteration an advantage, as AnduinOS explicitly identifies itself
    as Ubuntu in its /etc/os-release file. It is Ubuntu, intentionally
    avoiding introducing new concepts, leveraging Ubuntu’s extensive
    ecosystem and community knowledge.

    Of course, I eventually delved deeper into Debian's build toolchain, like
    using debootstrap. AnduinOS's source is more like an integrative wrapper
    allowing users to insert their own logos, dconf configurations, and
    generate their customized ISOs. I’m proud it has a convenient builder
    that's relatively easy to maintain.

    Thus, AnduinOS hasn't required significant effort from me—it’s a hobby
    project I tend to during my leisure time (many know my primary job is
    developing .NET applications). Curiously, my main job often remains
    unnoticed, while my hobby projects unexpectedly thrive. Ironically, my
    most starred project is a recipe.

    I'm genuinely surprised and grateful for the community's acknowledgment
    and interest in AnduinOS. I suspect its "success" lies precisely in the
    minimal changes—it’s merely Ubuntu dressed in a Windows theme, and that
    piques curiosity. I recognize this success may be fleeting and should not
    make me overly proud. After all, I’m standing on the shoulders of giants;
    numerous significant problems have already been solved, and I’m merely
    packaging and integrating existing solutions.

    Initially, I didn't even pre-install an app store, and many criticized
    this decision. Some people speculated excessively about my motives, but
    the truth was simple—I didn't need it personally. As I mentioned, this
    ISO was just something quickly put together for my own use, later shared
    casually with the community. It perfectly suited my personal needs, and
    that's all I wanted. Now, it comes pre-installed with Flatpak, aligning
    with my requirements. While Flatpak introduces its own challenges (like
    file access restrictions), it conveniently isolates applications whose
    behaviors I can't fully predict.

    I’ve learned a great deal about package management through this project,
    notably that apt, rpm, flatpak, snap, and appimage all fail to perfectly
    solve dependency issues and reproducibility problems. I continue to hold
    Nix in high esteem. Perhaps, if I ever fully adopt Nix, I'll utilize it
    to create my own OS.

    Many have asked why I don’t accept donations, how I profit, and if I plan
    to commercialize AnduinOS. Truthfully, I haven't thoroughly considered
    these issues. It's not my main job, and I don’t plan to rely on it for a
    living. Each month, I dedicate only a few hours to maintaining it.
    Perhaps in the future, I might consider providing enterprise solutions
    based on AnduinOS, but I won’t compromise its original simplicity. It has
    always been about providing myself with a comfortably themed Ubuntu.

    Amid the unpredictable global dynamics, I often feel I could lose my job
    anytime due to constantly changing U.S.-China relations. However, losing
    a job doesn't greatly concern me. As an engineer, the worst outcome would
    be spending a few months practicing algorithmic questions for job
    interviews. Additionally, AnduinOS might allow me to offer enterprise
    technical support or develop custom hardware—there are always
    opportunities to generate income. Some venture capitalists have expressed
    interest, but I've generally declined, reiterating that this is merely a
    hobby with no commercial future.

    I've also noticed criticism labeling AnduinOS as malicious, claiming it
    spies for the Chinese government. I find conspiracy theorists impossible
    to communicate with, as conspiracies are unfalsifiable by design.
    Nonetheless, since the source code is openly available, users can compile
    identical ISOs themselves. Embedding backdoors would be irrational and
    easily exposed.

    Certainly, AnduinOS is very new, immature, and maintained solely by me,
    leading to understandable concerns about potential abandonment or
    unresolved bugs. However, considering my stable lifestyle and the modest
    maintenance effort required, I intend to continue supporting it. If
    sponsorship or corporate cooperation emerges, perhaps I could even
    dedicate myself full-time.

    Interestingly, the engaging story of AnduinOS demonstrates that an OS
    maintained casually in spare time may hold more attraction. Precisely
    because it’s a hobby—not commercial—there's no incentive to incorporate
    undesirable elements. My primary goal is simply to maintain this original
    intent.

    Thanks to everyone for your support!

    https://news.anduinos.com/post/2025/5/6/story-behind-anduinos-a-letter-from-anduin

    Well, it's definitely a choice if you are looking to have a Windows-like system but don't want to use Windows. For me, stability isn't much of a concern with Windows. The only persistent problem is fTPM stuttering
    which I have no hope of ever solving short of moving to Linux
    completely. I know that I will eventually, especially since I am already
    in the process of getting DVD versions of the movies I bought in Films &
    TV to annul the value of that program, but I need to figure out how I
    can enable OPAL encryption _without_ sacrificing the computer's ability
    to wake from suspend. As it is, I can get the encryption working using
    SEDutil and it will suspend, but wake from sleep crashes. Apparently, I
    should be encrypting the storage with cryptsetup instead, but I'm not
    entirely sure what the process is to do so.
    --
    God be with you,

    CrudeSausage
    Islam is the enemy
    John 14:6
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From chrisv@chrisv@nospam.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Wed Aug 20 16:56:20 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    RonB wrote:

    https://news.anduinos.com/post/2025/5/6/story-behind-anduinos-a-letter-from-anduin

    It's a good thing that "Hadron" Quack's "OSS Approval Committee" was
    disbanded, or this would not have seen the light of day!
    --
    "I said that distro watch or similar should not catalog anything
    unless it has been through an OSS approval committee to *HELP* ensure
    that the market isn't flooded with half arsed distros made by nut jobs
    trying to get their names in lights" - "OSS Approval Committee"
    chairman "Hadron" Quack
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From RonB@ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Thu Aug 21 07:44:28 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2025-08-20, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2025-08-20 3:01 a.m., RonB wrote:
    Never heard of AnduinOS until yesterday. It's a distribution, based on
    Ubuntu, that is designed to look and work (sort of) like Windows 11. No Snap >> included by default, but FlatPak comes preloaded. It was developed by a
    Microsoft Employee (who has now been laid off — as of the end of July).

    I actually like it. It won't replace Linux Mint, but it's small, comes with >> a good selection of applications (but no Office suite, I guess you choose
    one yourself, if you want it). It installs quickly (about 10 minutes, which >> includes the updates). It uses a highly modified Gnome desktop and defaults >> to Wayland (which seems to work well even on my older computers). What
    really impresses is the attitude of its developer Anduin Xu, a Chinese
    developer. It's currently No. 13 on Distrowatch.

    What he writes about it (very long)...

    Story behind AnduinOS - A letter from Anduin

    I’m Anduin, the sole maintainer of AnduinOS.

    Recently, I noticed by chance that AnduinOS made it onto Distrowatch's >> trending list. Additionally, my server is overwhelmed daily by numerous >> multithreaded downloads, which left me astonished, wondering how I
    possibly deserved this attention. After reviewing community feedback and >> comments, I felt inclined to share more about the system's development >> journey and its background, and also to engage with the community more >> thoroughly.

    https://distrowatch.com/dwres.php?resource=trending

    First, yes, I am indeed a Microsoft employee. (Update 2025-07-20: Not
    anymore. I got laid off this month and will leave Microsoft soon.) I work
    full-time at Microsoft as an engineer, though my work isn't related to >> Windows. Thus, my financial situation is stable, and I currently have no >> plans to commercialize this project. Fundamentally, AnduinOS isn't meant >> to be a commercial endeavor anyway. It was simply a toy and practice
    exercise I put together during a leisurely afternoon.

    I often immerse myself in developing one-click configuration
    scripts—something many Linux enthusiasts do—because manually customizing
    a freshly installed system to match personal preferences is quite
    tedious. Typically, it takes me at least half an hour to repeatedly
    adjust settings. Naturally, at Microsoft, I use Windows daily. I find
    that Windows' interaction logic is highly efficient; unfortunately, its >> shell tends to crash frequently, and it's filled with intrusive
    advertisements.

    On the other hand, Linux's freedom allows almost limitless customization.
    In my spare time, I exclusively use Linux and write various automation >> scripts. My friends and I frequently exchange our automated initial
    configuration scripts. Being an Arch and NixOS user has consistently
    reminded me of the value of building from scratch while maintaining an >> awareness of past actions.

    Creating a distribution turned out to be not particularly difficult.
    Indeed, every NixOS and Gentoo user essentially becomes their own distro >> creator, utilizing formal languages to precisely describe the desired
    system configuration and aiming for a nearly "stateless" personal device.

    With this idea, I realized I could simply modify Ubuntu's official ISO, >> recompress it, and create a personalized distribution. Many criticized >> AnduinOS as involving minimal effort—essentially just changing a theme.
    But that’s precisely the effect I intended. I’m essentially just an >> ordinary Ubuntu user looking for a comfortable Linux experience in my
    spare time, nothing more. Interestingly, many others consider this
    minimal alteration an advantage, as AnduinOS explicitly identifies itself
    as Ubuntu in its /etc/os-release file. It is Ubuntu, intentionally
    avoiding introducing new concepts, leveraging Ubuntu’s extensive
    ecosystem and community knowledge.

    Of course, I eventually delved deeper into Debian's build toolchain, like
    using debootstrap. AnduinOS's source is more like an integrative wrapper >> allowing users to insert their own logos, dconf configurations, and
    generate their customized ISOs. I’m proud it has a convenient builder >> that's relatively easy to maintain.

    Thus, AnduinOS hasn't required significant effort from me—it’s a hobby
    project I tend to during my leisure time (many know my primary job is
    developing .NET applications). Curiously, my main job often remains
    unnoticed, while my hobby projects unexpectedly thrive. Ironically, my >> most starred project is a recipe.

    I'm genuinely surprised and grateful for the community's acknowledgment >> and interest in AnduinOS. I suspect its "success" lies precisely in the >> minimal changes—it’s merely Ubuntu dressed in a Windows theme, and that
    piques curiosity. I recognize this success may be fleeting and should not
    make me overly proud. After all, I’m standing on the shoulders of giants;
    numerous significant problems have already been solved, and I’m merely >> packaging and integrating existing solutions.

    Initially, I didn't even pre-install an app store, and many criticized >> this decision. Some people speculated excessively about my motives, but >> the truth was simple—I didn't need it personally. As I mentioned, this >> ISO was just something quickly put together for my own use, later shared >> casually with the community. It perfectly suited my personal needs, and >> that's all I wanted. Now, it comes pre-installed with Flatpak, aligning >> with my requirements. While Flatpak introduces its own challenges (like >> file access restrictions), it conveniently isolates applications whose >> behaviors I can't fully predict.

    I’ve learned a great deal about package management through this project,
    notably that apt, rpm, flatpak, snap, and appimage all fail to perfectly >> solve dependency issues and reproducibility problems. I continue to hold >> Nix in high esteem. Perhaps, if I ever fully adopt Nix, I'll utilize it >> to create my own OS.

    Many have asked why I don’t accept donations, how I profit, and if I plan
    to commercialize AnduinOS. Truthfully, I haven't thoroughly considered >> these issues. It's not my main job, and I don’t plan to rely on it for a
    living. Each month, I dedicate only a few hours to maintaining it.
    Perhaps in the future, I might consider providing enterprise solutions >> based on AnduinOS, but I won’t compromise its original simplicity. It has
    always been about providing myself with a comfortably themed Ubuntu.

    Amid the unpredictable global dynamics, I often feel I could lose my job >> anytime due to constantly changing U.S.-China relations. However, losing >> a job doesn't greatly concern me. As an engineer, the worst outcome would
    be spending a few months practicing algorithmic questions for job
    interviews. Additionally, AnduinOS might allow me to offer enterprise
    technical support or develop custom hardware—there are always
    opportunities to generate income. Some venture capitalists have expressed
    interest, but I've generally declined, reiterating that this is merely a >> hobby with no commercial future.

    I've also noticed criticism labeling AnduinOS as malicious, claiming it >> spies for the Chinese government. I find conspiracy theorists impossible >> to communicate with, as conspiracies are unfalsifiable by design.
    Nonetheless, since the source code is openly available, users can compile
    identical ISOs themselves. Embedding backdoors would be irrational and >> easily exposed.

    Certainly, AnduinOS is very new, immature, and maintained solely by me, >> leading to understandable concerns about potential abandonment or
    unresolved bugs. However, considering my stable lifestyle and the modest >> maintenance effort required, I intend to continue supporting it. If
    sponsorship or corporate cooperation emerges, perhaps I could even
    dedicate myself full-time.

    Interestingly, the engaging story of AnduinOS demonstrates that an OS
    maintained casually in spare time may hold more attraction. Precisely
    because it’s a hobby—not commercial—there's no incentive to incorporate
    undesirable elements. My primary goal is simply to maintain this original
    intent.

    Thanks to everyone for your support!

    https://news.anduinos.com/post/2025/5/6/story-behind-anduinos-a-letter-from-anduin

    Well, it's definitely a choice if you are looking to have a Windows-like system but don't want to use Windows. For me, stability isn't much of a concern with Windows. The only persistent problem is fTPM stuttering
    which I have no hope of ever solving short of moving to Linux
    completely. I know that I will eventually, especially since I am already
    in the process of getting DVD versions of the movies I bought in Films &
    TV to annul the value of that program, but I need to figure out how I
    can enable OPAL encryption _without_ sacrificing the computer's ability
    to wake from suspend. As it is, I can get the encryption working using SEDutil and it will suspend, but wake from sleep crashes. Apparently, I should be encrypting the storage with cryptsetup instead, but I'm not entirely sure what the process is to do so.

    The "looks like Windows" part of AnduinOS isn't really what really impressed me. It was how small and fast it was, and the fact that a single maintainer could bolt together a whole new distribution relatively easily.

    I decided to install a printer on the AnduinOS partition and found there are no printer drivers included ("that would take up another 3 GB according
    Anduin Xue — left off the "e" yesterday). Not that it's that big of a deal, I'm just used to Linux Mint just having the drivers. So my my thing today
    was testing out the Linux Mint 22.2 beta. It looks pretty much like Linux 22.1, but I guess there are some differences. It's using a newer kernel (6.14... something, for one).
    --
    Definition of Insanity: Thinking you can
    beat the Bear on his own territory.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From RonB@ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Thu Aug 21 07:45:47 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2025-08-20, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
    RonB wrote:

    https://news.anduinos.com/post/2025/5/6/story-behind-anduinos-a-letter-from-anduin

    It's a good thing that "Hadron" Quack's "OSS Approval Committee" was disbanded, or this would not have seen the light of day!

    "Hadron" thinks choice is a weakness of Linux. I think it's the opposite.
    --
    Definition of Insanity: Thinking you can
    beat the Bear on his own territory.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2