On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 15:14:42 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:Is that what you think happened?
On 2025-12-02 15:13, Collectivists_Always_Fail wrote:
On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 15:05:13 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:That's the best you can do? Really?
On 2025-12-02 14:57, Collectivists_Always_Fail wrote:
On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 14:39:18 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:Do you see the words "social collectivity" and "state", "nation",
On 2025-12-02 12:53, Collectivists_Always_Fail wrote:
On 02 Dec 2025 20:31:11 GMT, Brock McNuggetsUmmmmm...nope.
<brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
Collectivism doesn't mean "giving up your rights to a leader"
That's exactly what happens with collectivism. Collectivism requires >>>>>>> compliance.
"Collectivism, any of several types of social organization in which
the individual is seen as being subordinate to a social collectivity >>>>> such as a state, a nation, a race, or a social class. Collectivism >>>>> may be contrasted with individualism (q.v.), in which the rights and >>>>> interests of the individual are emphasized.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/collectivism
See where it says "subordinate," dimwit?
"race", and "social class"?
You do? Good!
Now... ...do you see the word...
..."leader"?
<chuckles> Do you really believe that those entities don't have any
leaders?
It didn't take much to put you down. I didn't want to overkill.
On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 15:05:13 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-12-02 14:57, Collectivists_Always_Fail wrote:
On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 14:39:18 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:Do you see the words "social collectivity" and "state", "nation",
On 2025-12-02 12:53, Collectivists_Always_Fail wrote:
On 02 Dec 2025 20:31:11 GMT, Brock McNuggetsUmmmmm...nope.
<brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
Collectivism doesn't mean "giving up your rights to a leader"
That's exactly what happens with collectivism. Collectivism requires >>>>> compliance.
"Collectivism, any of several types of social organization in which
the individual is seen as being subordinate to a social collectivity
such as a state, a nation, a race, or a social class. Collectivism
may be contrasted with individualism (q.v.), in which the rights and
interests of the individual are emphasized.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/collectivism
See where it says "subordinate," dimwit?
"race", and "social class"?
You do? Good!
Now... ...do you see the word...
..."leader"?
<chuckles> Do you really believe that those entities don't have any
leaders?
On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 14:39:18 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-12-02 12:53, Collectivists_Always_Fail wrote:
On 02 Dec 2025 20:31:11 GMT, Brock McNuggetsUmmmmm...nope.
<brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
Collectivism doesn't mean "giving up your rights to a leader"
That's exactly what happens with collectivism. Collectivism requires
compliance.
"Collectivism, any of several types of social organization in which
the individual is seen as being subordinate to a social collectivity
such as a state, a nation, a race, or a social class. Collectivism
may be contrasted with individualism (q.v.), in which the rights and
interests of the individual are emphasized. https://www.britannica.com/topic/collectivism
See where it says "subordinate," dimwit?
People who engage in activities they call "civil disobedience
are doing the exact opposite of disobedience. They are trying
to make other people obey their demands.
On Tue, 02 Dec 2025 18:56:36 +0000, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com>
wrote:
Collectivists_Always_Fail <MeanDog@stonewall.Dash> wrote in >>news:d18uik5caca1q3jlit11of8blui9dh698e@4ax.com:
On Tue, 02 Dec 2025 14:24:10 +0000, Mitchell Holman
<noemail@aol.com> wrote:
Collectivists_Always_Fail <MeanDog@stonewall.Dash> wrote in >>>>news:073tikp2ttfslj2cou7ujd771cmch2v4h0@4ax.com:
It's my opinion that underlying culture another part of the
problem. The belief among many poor people, and people like you
who make excuses for them, that they are victims which, in their
minds, justify their property crimes, and in some cases violent
crimes, as well.
What justifies the property crimes of the rich?
I'll bet Hollowhead irritates the attendants at his nursing home
regularly with his constantly changing the subject.
You didn't answer the question.
Correct... Hollowhead a finally got something right.
And speaking of nursing homes........
...another change of subject...
On 2025-12-02 15:17, Collectivists_Always_Fail wrote:
On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 15:14:42 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:Is that what you think happened?
On 2025-12-02 15:13, Collectivists_Always_Fail wrote:
On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 15:05:13 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:That's the best you can do? Really?
On 2025-12-02 14:57, Collectivists_Always_Fail wrote:
On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 14:39:18 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:Do you see the words "social collectivity" and "state", "nation",
On 2025-12-02 12:53, Collectivists_Always_Fail wrote:
On 02 Dec 2025 20:31:11 GMT, Brock McNuggetsUmmmmm...nope.
<brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
Collectivism doesn't mean "giving up your rights to a leader" >>>>>>>>That's exactly what happens with collectivism. Collectivism requires >>>>>>>> compliance.
"Collectivism, any of several types of social organization in which >>>>>> the individual is seen as being subordinate to a social collectivity >>>>>> such as a state, a nation, a race, or a social class. Collectivism >>>>>> may be contrasted with individualism (q.v.), in which the rights and >>>>>> interests of the individual are emphasized.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/collectivism
See where it says "subordinate," dimwit?
"race", and "social class"?
You do? Good!
Now... ...do you see the word...
..."leader"?
<chuckles> Do you really believe that those entities don't have any
leaders?
It didn't take much to put you down. I didn't want to overkill.
How cute!
Collectivists_Always_Fail <MeanDog@stonewall.Dash> wrote in >news:ovduikhv0rm9k5se7fmsnfjvdvit2fu14d@4ax.com:
On Tue, 02 Dec 2025 18:56:36 +0000, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com>
wrote:
Collectivists_Always_Fail <MeanDog@stonewall.Dash> wrote in >>>news:d18uik5caca1q3jlit11of8blui9dh698e@4ax.com:
On Tue, 02 Dec 2025 14:24:10 +0000, Mitchell Holman
<noemail@aol.com> wrote:
Collectivists_Always_Fail <MeanDog@stonewall.Dash> wrote in >>>>>news:073tikp2ttfslj2cou7ujd771cmch2v4h0@4ax.com:
It's my opinion that underlying culture another part of the
problem. The belief among many poor people, and people like you
who make excuses for them, that they are victims which, in their
minds, justify their property crimes, and in some cases violent
crimes, as well.
What justifies the property crimes of the rich?
I'll bet Hollowhead irritates the attendants at his nursing home
regularly with his constantly changing the subject.
You didn't answer the question.
Correct... Hollowhead a finally got something right.
And speaking of nursing homes........
...another change of subject...
YOU brought up the subject of nursing homes,
remember?
In article <692d0331$2$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
Denial does not change the facts.
I'm not denying anything.
I'm simply stating that your evidence does in no way back
up your claims.
You are one hell of a liar.
How do you live with yourself?
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-teddybear>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitonduck>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitongoogle>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse1>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse2>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse3>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse4>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse5>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse6>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse7>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse8>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse9>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse10>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse11>
Johnson <lostmyemail@quick.net>
Can you please take your rants elsewhere and not use them to invade FOUR separate groups?
I admit I often have responded to such, and my responses can be seen as
a part of the problem. Not even saying I will never do so again, but
unless you have something new -- something that has not been countered a dozen times -- please move to new material.
Now you go and find some old source code you don't understand and ask
for Snits advice concerning it? The idiot didn't even realize what
you were asking about and provided you no answer.
David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared
with you.
This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing.
I am well aware that those who seek to attack do so out of their own weaknesses and insecurities. Even with those I disagree with, say
Gremlin and Carroll, I try to note good things about them... and am
sincere when I do so. And even when I am not nice in responding to
trolling I am honest, and I try to not sink to their level.
Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?
https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-city-tn/computer-stores
On Aug 12, 2020 at 12:19:32 AM MST, "David_B" <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?
https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-city-tn/computer-stores
Not there.
OK. Thanks for looking.
Please try here:-
https://www.yellowpages.com/kingsport-tn/computer-stores
121 results! Sorry there are so many to check.
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> news:693196da$2$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com Thu, 04 Dec 2025 14:12:42
GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
Can you please take your rants elsewhere and not use them to invade FOUR
separate groups?
Snit, I'll make a deal with you. You apologize for writing the following
lies about me, I'll leave you to eat as much Jenkem as you like.
I admit I often have responded to such, and my responses can be seen as
a part of the problem. Not even saying I will never do so again, but
unless you have something new -- something that has not been countered a
dozen times -- please move to new material.
Writing lies about people tends to cause problems for you, Snit.
So, here's some shit you wrote about me that isn't and never was true.
When do you suppose you'll own upto what you did and apologize?
MID: <hhk7lhFue2dU2@mid.individual.net> https://al.howardknight.net/?ID=159159190100
From: Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Re: Please note.
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 22:05:53 -0700
Lines: 112
Message-ID: <hhk7lhFue2dU2@mid.individual.net>
References: <o2fsG.77364$fk3.33122@fx26.ams1>
<hheifoFogdjU1@mid.individual.net> <hoxsG.136803$Fx.134030@fx19.ams1>
<XnsABB76B32E964HT1@8P1PQ2e52.7r7wsG43c>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: individual.net P3QujyHkDb6On1S3Ju3AUAnu1dD1KlmTQH6yrHedd0nc95933I Cancel-Lock: sha1:gShl/2fVAEVSOuI+bztI9zcX9FE=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0
In-Reply-To: <XnsABB76B32E964HT1@8P1PQ2e52.7r7wsG43c>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 5092
On 5/7/20 9:36 PM, Diesel wrote:
....
Now you go and find some old source code you don't understand and ask
for Snits advice concerning it? The idiot didn't even realize what
you were asking about and provided you no answer.
Ah, more trolling of me by you. So more reminding you of your past
nonsense.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Diesel
<XnsAB6D6F1BFA61HT1@3dOIZISX3.IwU6R1OH8iz29MMTN26bF08TPFtT157gyFB5>:
-----
Snit, if you're running the bot you have an easy way out
that won't cost you any respect, face, or anything else.
Just stop. That's it. Simple right?
-----
Johnson <lostmyemail@quick.net> news:MPG.4396d26a8f73c0b59896ba@usnews.blocknews.net Mon, 01 Dec 2025 03:15:46 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
In article <692d0331$2$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
Denial does not change the facts.
I'm not denying anything.
I'm simply stating that your evidence does in no way back up your
claims.
He's been told this many times by a variety of people. He ignores them
all and continues to post the bullshit he calls 'evidence' or 'receipts'
and he will continue doing so. It's what he does. It's part of his
newsgroup destructive routine. He follows a simple concept. Repeat the
bs often enough, it'll convince someone it's true.
You are one hell of a liar.
Some of us are well aware of this. Others have to learn this about him
the hard way. By the time they realize they've been snookered, and
snookered well, it's already too late.
How do you live with yourself?
Sadly, you're completely wasting your time. The majority of the regulars
here are all well aware of him and generally ignore him. He thrives on
any responses. even the negative ones. It allows him to repeat himself,
ad nausem. It's the attention he seeks, good or bad, it's the attention. You're actually contributing to his efforts by calling him out. It took
me a bit of time to come to this realization myself. I was warned by
another new comer at the time to the newsgroup what he was actually
about, but, I didn't listen to the sound advice. I engaged and defended myself. Which is exactly what Snit wanted - I was feeding him. Just as
you presently are.
None of snits so called 'evidence' backs his claims and they never will.
He completely fabricated a story about me and then morphed what he did.
At no time does he accept any responsibility for what he writes. It's
always the other person. Always. You cannot reason with Snit. It's not
why he's here. It's just the attention he seeks, and as long as you
respond, you're giving him exactly what he wants.
Some of us have found that not directly responding to him, but
discussing him, as i'm doing with you irks him to no end - to the point
where other newsgroups have relieved themselves of him. If he can't get
the attention and the back and forth bullshit, he pisses off -
eventually. I strongly encourage you to proceed as the majority of us
have been doing.
I'm guilty recently of having directly responded to some of his nonsense
-
He likes to bait people into responses by doing what you've seen him repeatedly do towards Pothead. He will continue to bait you as well. A response is what he seeks, and he'll play this game with you until you
catch onto what's up and treat him as he should be - not directly
responded to, but discussed amongst ourselves.
He will latch onto this reply of mine and do the same thing you've
already seen with Pothead. Feel free to check out his so called
'receipts' towards me - You'll find it's the same thing he's been doing
with Pothead. He gets off on doing this shit. Eventually you'll see this
for yourself, if you haven't already started to suspect it. He knows
what he posts about Pothead, Steve Carroll (SC), myself, and others is
all bullshit - it doesn't matter to him as long as a response is coming.
He baits people into responding, to call him out. He really doesn't care
that you do. He's only interested in a response from you. He has a
severe problem with reading comprehension as well - I suspect you've
noticed that already.
Here's some additional links you might find of interest. You can
actually sample nearly any post from him and match it up to the snitlies methods link. He's that well known and his method is that well known.
He's been doing this for decades and has no intentions of stopping. When enough people ignore him, he pisses off to yet another newsgroup and
starts his bullshit all over again. It's what he does.
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-teddybear> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitonduck>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitongoogle>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse1>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse2>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse3>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse4>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse5>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse6>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse7>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse8>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse9>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse10>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse11>
Those links explain exactly what kind of person he is and why he does
what he does. Your efforts to call him out for the lies he repeatedly
writes about others is noble, but, it's ignored by him. It allows him to
do what he's doing. It's best not to respond directly to him. It's not
always easy though, especially when you have him dead to rights lying
his ass off. He will just play stupid and repeat himself. The thing is,
he's not playing stupid. He is rather stupid.
On Thu, 4 Dec 2025 04:59:30 -0000 (UTC), Gremlin wrote:
Johnson <lostmyemail@quick.net>
news:MPG.4396d26a8f73c0b59896ba@usnews.blocknews.net Mon, 01 Dec 2025
03:15:46 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
In article <692d0331$2$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
Denial does not change the facts.
I'm not denying anything.
I'm simply stating that your evidence does in no way back up your
claims.
He's been told this many times by a variety of people. He ignores them
all and continues to post the bullshit he calls 'evidence' or 'receipts'
and he will continue doing so. It's what he does. It's part of his
newsgroup destructive routine. He follows a simple concept. Repeat the
bs often enough, it'll convince someone it's true.
It didn't take Johnson long to figure out the snit troll.
He's dissected snit like a board certified surgeon.
Johnson posts in one of the Linux system admin groups frequently and is
well respected.
You are one hell of a liar.
Some of us are well aware of this. Others have to learn this about him
the hard way. By the time they realize they've been snookered, and
snookered well, it's already too late.
Yea.
Experience is the best teacher.
How do you live with yourself?
Sadly, you're completely wasting your time. The majority of the regulars
here are all well aware of him and generally ignore him. He thrives on
any responses. even the negative ones. It allows him to repeat himself,
ad nausem. It's the attention he seeks, good or bad, it's the attention.
You're actually contributing to his efforts by calling him out. It took
me a bit of time to come to this realization myself. I was warned by
another new comer at the time to the newsgroup what he was actually
about, but, I didn't listen to the sound advice. I engaged and defended
myself. Which is exactly what Snit wanted - I was feeding him. Just as
you presently are.
None of snits so called 'evidence' backs his claims and they never will.
He completely fabricated a story about me and then morphed what he did.
At no time does he accept any responsibility for what he writes. It's
always the other person. Always. You cannot reason with Snit. It's not
why he's here. It's just the attention he seeks, and as long as you
respond, you're giving him exactly what he wants.
I've had some down time recently and for lack of any better way to waste
my time I decided to check out some of snit's claims against you, Gremlin, Steve Carroll and Pothead and after thoroughly visiting the links and
Message ID's that snit posted it quickly became obvious that snit is lying and his links by any reasonable interpretation have absolutely zero confirmation of his claims.
Examples include his claims you had the source code to snit's flooding
bot.
Steve Carroll stating the .gov site claimed snit had an order of
protection filed against him by his ex wife Anne Glasser.
It was pure speculation on Steve Carroll's part, a what if, and Steve
Carroll clearly said that.
Pothead being a racist bigot. Not even close. Snit fed list of statements Pothead has made, like people who are not legal citizens of the U.S. ,
should not be given Medicaid, free cell phones and things like that.
Whoopee Einstein.
The vast majority of Americans believe the same thing.
Are they bigots and racists, white supremacists as well?
That's snit's faulty logic in action.
Some of us have found that not directly responding to him, but
discussing him, as i'm doing with you irks him to no end - to the point
where other newsgroups have relieved themselves of him. If he can't get
the attention and the back and forth bullshit, he pisses off -
eventually. I strongly encourage you to proceed as the majority of us
have been doing.
Snit responds to me even though I rarely respond to him.
He is scored down in pan.
He seems to crave attention even when it is negative.
That seems obtuse to me.
I'm guilty recently of having directly responded to some of his nonsense
-
He likes to bait people into responses by doing what you've seen him
repeatedly do towards Pothead. He will continue to bait you as well. A
response is what he seeks, and he'll play this game with you until you
catch onto what's up and treat him as he should be - not directly
responded to, but discussed amongst ourselves.
That's how snit operates.
IMHO there is nothing wrong with correcting his lies, and there are plenty
to correct.
And for those of you who snit has used your real name, you have a very
good legal case against snit for defamation.
Nyms like Pothead or mine Glock have less of a case unless that nym is
well known on blogs, as a digital creator and situations like that.
That doesn't apply to me but maybe to Pothead, I can't say.
He seems like he laughs off snit and finds snit entertaining.
Again, just an observation.
He will latch onto this reply of mine and do the same thing you've
already seen with Pothead. Feel free to check out his so called
'receipts' towards me - You'll find it's the same thing he's been doing
with Pothead. He gets off on doing this shit. Eventually you'll see this
for yourself, if you haven't already started to suspect it. He knows
what he posts about Pothead, Steve Carroll (SC), myself, and others is
all bullshit - it doesn't matter to him as long as a response is coming.
100% true.
The regulars in the gun groups that snit infiltrated spotted this early
on.
It's how snit rolls.
He baits people into responding, to call him out. He really doesn't care
that you do. He's only interested in a response from you. He has a
severe problem with reading comprehension as well - I suspect you've
noticed that already.
I've noticed that.
Most of Usenet, technical discussions excepted, is about an 8th grade
reading level so it's sad that snit fails so often to comprehend what he
is reading and replying to.
And when he fucks up he rarely makes a full apology but somehow manages to drag others into his apology.
It's weird.
Here's some additional links you might find of interest. You can
actually sample nearly any post from him and match it up to the snitlies
methods link. He's that well known and his method is that well known.
He's been doing this for decades and has no intentions of stopping. When
enough people ignore him, he pisses off to yet another newsgroup and
starts his bullshit all over again. It's what he does.
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods> >>>> <https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-teddybear> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitonduck>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitongoogle>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse1>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse2>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse3>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse4>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse5>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse6>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse7>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse8>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse9>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse10>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse11>
Those links explain exactly what kind of person he is and why he does
what he does. Your efforts to call him out for the lies he repeatedly
writes about others is noble, but, it's ignored by him. It allows him to
do what he's doing. It's best not to respond directly to him. It's not
always easy though, especially when you have him dead to rights lying
his ass off. He will just play stupid and repeat himself. The thing is,
he's not playing stupid. He is rather stupid.
It's actually hilarious when snit claims nobody can quote his lies or poor behavior.
He is delusional.
Whatever drugs he is taking must be quite potent.
The great system of capitalism caused depressions every 20 years
culminating in the Great Depression. To save capitalism FDR muzzled it
which prevented catastrophes until Reagan removed the muzzle. Anyone
still do business with FSLIC?
On Dec 1, 2025 at 4:42:08 PM MST, "chrisv" wrote <6u9sikh6i0e1fb7ednlb7g0274m993hcfi@4ax.com>:
-hh wrote:
On 11/27/25 21:22, Alan wrote:
On 2025-11-27 17:56, chrisv wrote:
(unread)
Curious why you advertise that you can't defend your views. I mean good of you
to admit it, but you are not doing so in a mature way.
On 12/1/25 19:03, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Dec 1, 2025 at 4:42:08 PM MST, "chrisv" wrote
<6u9sikh6i0e1fb7ednlb7g0274m993hcfi@4ax.com>:
-hh wrote:
On 11/27/25 21:22, Alan wrote:
On 2025-11-27 17:56, chrisv wrote:
(unread)
Curious why you advertise that you can't defend your views. I mean good of you
to admit it, but you are not doing so in a mature way.
As what was said in the very first line of chrisv's "(unread)":
"The problem with this discussion tends to be the deflections."
-hh
On Dec 5, 2025 at 11:40:45 AM MST, "-hh" wrote <10gv8vd$1l1mn$2@dont-email.me>:
On 12/1/25 19:03, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Dec 1, 2025 at 4:42:08 PM MST, "chrisv" wrote
<6u9sikh6i0e1fb7ednlb7g0274m993hcfi@4ax.com>:
-hh wrote:
On 11/27/25 21:22, Alan wrote:
On 2025-11-27 17:56, chrisv wrote:
(unread)
Curious why you advertise that you can't defend your views. I mean
good of you to admit it, but you are not doing so in a mature way.
As what was said in the very first line of chrisv's "(unread)":
"The problem with this discussion tends to be the deflections."
-hh
That is common in these waters.
On Thu, 4 Dec 2025 04:59:30 -0000 (UTC), Gremlin wrote:
It didn't take Johnson long to figure out the snit troll.
He's dissected snit like a board certified surgeon.
Johnson posts in one of the Linux system admin groups frequently and is
well respected.
You are one hell of a liar.
Some of us are well aware of this. Others have to learn this about him
the hard way. By the time they realize they've been snookered, and
snookered well, it's already too late.
Yea.
Experience is the best teacher.
I've had some down time recently and for lack of any better way to waste
my time I decided to check out some of snit's claims against you, Gremlin, Steve Carroll and Pothead and after thoroughly visiting the links and Message ID's that snit posted it quickly became obvious that snit is lying and his links by any reasonable interpretation have absolutely zero confirmation of his claims.
Examples include his claims you had the source code to snit's flooding
bot.
Steve Carroll stating the .gov site claimed snit had an order of
protection filed against him by his ex wife Anne Glasser.
It was pure speculation on Steve Carroll's part, a what if, and Steve Carroll clearly said that.
Pothead being a racist bigot. Not even close. Snit fed list of statements Pothead has made, like people who are not legal citizens of the U.S. , should not be given Medicaid, free cell phones and things like that.
Whoopee Einstein.
The vast majority of Americans believe the same thing.
Are they bigots and racists, white supremacists as well?
That's snit's faulty logic in action.
That's how snit operates.
IMHO there is nothing wrong with correcting his lies, and there are plenty to correct.
And for those of you who snit has used your real name, you have a very
good legal case against snit for defamation.
He will latch onto this reply of mine and do the same thing you've
already seen with Pothead. Feel free to check out his so called
'receipts' towards me - You'll find it's the same thing he's been doing
with Pothead. He gets off on doing this shit. Eventually you'll see this
for yourself, if you haven't already started to suspect it. He knows
what he posts about Pothead, Steve Carroll (SC), myself, and others is
all bullshit - it doesn't matter to him as long as a response is coming.
100% true.
The regulars in the gun groups that snit infiltrated spotted this early
on.
It's how snit rolls.
He baits people into responding, to call him out. He really doesn't care
that you do. He's only interested in a response from you. He has a
severe problem with reading comprehension as well - I suspect you've
noticed that already.
I've noticed that.
Most of Usenet, technical discussions excepted, is about an 8th grade reading level so it's sad that snit fails so often to comprehend what he
is reading and replying to.
And when he fucks up he rarely makes a full apology but somehow manages to drag others into his apology.
It's weird.
It's actually hilarious when snit claims nobody can quote his lies or poor behavior.
He is delusional.
Whatever drugs he is taking must be quite potent.
On Dec 4, 2025 at 5:18:59 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote <XnsB3ABC47F0C9E7HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:
Writing lies about people tends to cause problems for you, Snit.
You make accusations and lie. And then get called out. And as you say, that leads to problems.
Why not just move on in peace?
That is my quoting you.
<snipped the rest... learn to get to a damned point!?
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> news:693225ae$1$21959$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com Fri, 05 Dec 2025 00:22:06 GMT in comp.os.linux.advocacy, wrote:
On Dec 4, 2025 at 5:18:59 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote
<XnsB3ABC47F0C9E7HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:
Writing lies about people tends to cause problems for you, Snit.
You make accusations and lie. And then get called out. And as you say, that >> leads to problems.
That's a rather weak spin, Snit.
Charlie Glock <charlieglock@localhost.com> news:693258cf$3$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com Fri, 05 Dec 2025 04:00:15 GMT in comp.os.linux.advocacy, wrote:
On Thu, 4 Dec 2025 04:59:30 -0000 (UTC), Gremlin wrote:
It didn't take Johnson long to figure out the snit troll.
He's dissected snit like a board certified surgeon.
Johnson posts in one of the Linux system admin groups frequently and is
well respected.
I've noticed. :) I did a little quick check on the nym. Smart individual and well respected as you wrote.
You are one hell of a liar.
Some of us are well aware of this. Others have to learn this about him
the hard way. By the time they realize they've been snookered, and
snookered well, it's already too late.
Yea.
Experience is the best teacher.
It can be, it doesn't have to be. For example, One doesn't need to know what an explosive device will do to them by experiencing it for themselves. In those cases, experience is a hard way to learn. :)
I've had some down time recently and for lack of any better way to waste
my time I decided to check out some of snit's claims against you, Gremlin, >> Steve Carroll and Pothead and after thoroughly visiting the links and
Message ID's that snit posted it quickly became obvious that snit is lying >> and his links by any reasonable interpretation have absolutely zero
confirmation of his claims.
No doubt about it.
Examples include his claims you had the source code to snit's flooding
bot.
Steve Carroll stating the .gov site claimed snit had an order of
protection filed against him by his ex wife Anne Glasser.
It was pure speculation on Steve Carroll's part, a what if, and Steve
Carroll clearly said that.
Pothead being a racist bigot. Not even close. Snit fed list of statements
Pothead has made, like people who are not legal citizens of the U.S. ,
should not be given Medicaid, free cell phones and things like that.
Whoopee Einstein.
The vast majority of Americans believe the same thing.
Are they bigots and racists, white supremacists as well?
That's snit's faulty logic in action.
Faulty logic and severe reading comprehension issues all rolled into one!
That's how snit operates.
IMHO there is nothing wrong with correcting his lies, and there are plenty >> to correct.
True, but, it does tend to piss some people off when it's done. I suspect, but cannot confirm that they grow tired of it repeatedly happening?
And for those of you who snit has used your real name, you have a very
good legal case against snit for defamation.
Also true, but, Snit isn't in a financial position to be able to pay any
fees awarded. Possibly another reason he does it?
He will latch onto this reply of mine and do the same thing you've
already seen with Pothead. Feel free to check out his so called
'receipts' towards me - You'll find it's the same thing he's been doing
with Pothead. He gets off on doing this shit. Eventually you'll see this >>> for yourself, if you haven't already started to suspect it. He knows
what he posts about Pothead, Steve Carroll (SC), myself, and others is
all bullshit - it doesn't matter to him as long as a response is coming.
100% true.
The regulars in the gun groups that snit infiltrated spotted this early
on.
It's how snit rolls.
Without a doubt.
He baits people into responding, to call him out. He really doesn't care >>> that you do. He's only interested in a response from you. He has a
severe problem with reading comprehension as well - I suspect you've
noticed that already.
I've noticed that.
Most of Usenet, technical discussions excepted, is about an 8th grade
reading level so it's sad that snit fails so often to comprehend what he
is reading and replying to.
FAS possibly? He's claimed that he suffers with it.
And when he fucks up he rarely makes a full apology but somehow manages to >> drag others into his apology.
It's weird.
I've seen one of his so called apologies. It didn't mention what he did or who he was apologizing to. In that case it should have been to me for
falsely stating that I'd written a direct lie about David Brooks. Snit completely avoided taking any accountability for what he wrote about me. The lie he wrote about me specifically. He also didn't deal with the other lie
he wrote that David didn't do as I'd written. Snits reply was only two fucking lines man, and he lied in both! WTF?!? :)
It's actually hilarious when snit claims nobody can quote his lies or poor >> behavior.
He is delusional.
Whatever drugs he is taking must be quite potent.
He needs to be dealt with as one would be on a jobsite when they wanted to run their mouths. That would adjust his attitude...Sometimes an individual cannot learn any other way.
On Thu, 4 Dec 2025 04:59:30 -0000 (UTC), Gremlin wrote:
Johnson <lostmyemail@quick.net>
news:MPG.4396d26a8f73c0b59896ba@usnews.blocknews.net Mon, 01 Dec 2025
03:15:46 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
In article <692d0331$2$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
Denial does not change the facts.
I'm not denying anything.
I'm simply stating that your evidence does in no way back up your
claims.
He's been told this many times by a variety of people. He ignores them
all and continues to post the bullshit he calls 'evidence' or 'receipts'
and he will continue doing so. It's what he does. It's part of his
newsgroup destructive routine. He follows a simple concept. Repeat the
bs often enough, it'll convince someone it's true.
It didn't take Johnson long to figure out the snit troll.
He's dissected snit like a board certified surgeon.
Johnson posts in one of the Linux system admin groups frequently and is
well respected.
You are one hell of a liar.
Some of us are well aware of this. Others have to learn this about him
the hard way. By the time they realize they've been snookered, and
snookered well, it's already too late.
Yea.
Experience is the best teacher.
How do you live with yourself?
Sadly, you're completely wasting your time. The majority of the regulars
here are all well aware of him and generally ignore him. He thrives on
any responses. even the negative ones. It allows him to repeat himself,
ad nausem. It's the attention he seeks, good or bad, it's the attention.
You're actually contributing to his efforts by calling him out. It took
me a bit of time to come to this realization myself. I was warned by
another new comer at the time to the newsgroup what he was actually
about, but, I didn't listen to the sound advice. I engaged and defended
myself. Which is exactly what Snit wanted - I was feeding him. Just as
you presently are.
None of snits so called 'evidence' backs his claims and they never will.
He completely fabricated a story about me and then morphed what he did.
At no time does he accept any responsibility for what he writes. It's
always the other person. Always. You cannot reason with Snit. It's not
why he's here. It's just the attention he seeks, and as long as you
respond, you're giving him exactly what he wants.
I've had some down time recently and for lack of any better way to waste
my time I decided to check out some of snit's claims against you, Gremlin, Steve Carroll and Pothead and after thoroughly visiting the links and Message ID's that snit posted it quickly became obvious that snit is lying and his links by any reasonable interpretation have absolutely zero confirmation of his claims.
Examples include his claims you had the source code to snit's flooding
bot.
Steve Carroll stating the .gov site claimed snit had an order of
protection filed against him by his ex wife Anne Glasser.
It was pure speculation on Steve Carroll's part, a what if, and Steve Carroll clearly said that.
Pothead being a racist bigot. Not even close. Snit fed list of statements Pothead has made, like people who are not legal citizens of the U.S. , should not be given Medicaid, free cell phones and things like that.
Whoopee Einstein.
The vast majority of Americans believe the same thing.
Are they bigots and racists, white supremacists as well?
That's snit's faulty logic in action.
Some of us have found that not directly responding to him, but
discussing him, as i'm doing with you irks him to no end - to the point
where other newsgroups have relieved themselves of him. If he can't get
the attention and the back and forth bullshit, he pisses off -
eventually. I strongly encourage you to proceed as the majority of us
have been doing.
Snit responds to me even though I rarely respond to him.
He is scored down in pan.
He seems to crave attention even when it is negative.
That seems obtuse to me.
I'm guilty recently of having directly responded to some of his nonsense
-
He likes to bait people into responses by doing what you've seen him
repeatedly do towards Pothead. He will continue to bait you as well. A
response is what he seeks, and he'll play this game with you until you
catch onto what's up and treat him as he should be - not directly
responded to, but discussed amongst ourselves.
That's how snit operates.
IMHO there is nothing wrong with correcting his lies, and there are plenty to correct.
And for those of you who snit has used your real name, you have a very
good legal case against snit for defamation.
Nyms like Pothead or mine Glock have less of a case unless that nym is
well known on blogs, as a digital creator and situations like that.
That doesn't apply to me but maybe to Pothead, I can't say.
He seems like he laughs off snit and finds snit entertaining.
Again, just an observation.
He will latch onto this reply of mine and do the same thing you've
already seen with Pothead. Feel free to check out his so called
'receipts' towards me - You'll find it's the same thing he's been doing
with Pothead. He gets off on doing this shit. Eventually you'll see this
for yourself, if you haven't already started to suspect it. He knows
what he posts about Pothead, Steve Carroll (SC), myself, and others is
all bullshit - it doesn't matter to him as long as a response is coming.
100% true.
The regulars in the gun groups that snit infiltrated spotted this early
on.
It's how snit rolls.
He baits people into responding, to call him out. He really doesn't care
that you do. He's only interested in a response from you. He has a
severe problem with reading comprehension as well - I suspect you've
noticed that already.
I've noticed that.
Most of Usenet, technical discussions excepted, is about an 8th grade reading level so it's sad that snit fails so often to comprehend what he
is reading and replying to.
And when he fucks up he rarely makes a full apology but somehow manages to drag others into his apology.
It's weird.
Here's some additional links you might find of interest. You can
actually sample nearly any post from him and match it up to the snitlies
methods link. He's that well known and his method is that well known.
He's been doing this for decades and has no intentions of stopping. When
enough people ignore him, he pisses off to yet another newsgroup and
starts his bullshit all over again. It's what he does.
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods> >>>> <https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-teddybear> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitonduck>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitongoogle>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse1>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse2>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse3>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse4>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse5>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse6>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse7>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse8>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse9>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse10>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse11>
Those links explain exactly what kind of person he is and why he does
what he does. Your efforts to call him out for the lies he repeatedly
writes about others is noble, but, it's ignored by him. It allows him to
do what he's doing. It's best not to respond directly to him. It's not
always easy though, especially when you have him dead to rights lying
his ass off. He will just play stupid and repeat himself. The thing is,
he's not playing stupid. He is rather stupid.
It's actually hilarious when snit claims nobody can quote his lies or poor behavior.
He is delusional.
Whatever drugs he is taking must be quite potent.
On 2025-12-05, Charlie Glock <charlieglock@localhost.com> wrote:
On Thu, 4 Dec 2025 04:59:30 -0000 (UTC), Gremlin wrote:
Johnson <lostmyemail@quick.net>
news:MPG.4396d26a8f73c0b59896ba@usnews.blocknews.net Mon, 01 Dec 2025
03:15:46 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
In article <692d0331$2$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
Denial does not change the facts.
I'm not denying anything.
I'm simply stating that your evidence does in no way back up your
claims.
He's been told this many times by a variety of people. He ignores them
all and continues to post the bullshit he calls 'evidence' or 'receipts' >>> and he will continue doing so. It's what he does. It's part of his
newsgroup destructive routine. He follows a simple concept. Repeat the
bs often enough, it'll convince someone it's true.
It didn't take Johnson long to figure out the snit troll.
He's dissected snit like a board certified surgeon.
Johnson posts in one of the Linux system admin groups frequently and is
well respected.
That doesn't surprise me at all.
Johnson seems intelligent, writes well without ai and figured snit out rather quickly which is eating at snit as he tries to recover.
At this point snit can't put Humpty Dumpty (snit Brock) back together again so
he will resort to one of his one liners like boring or accusing people of being socks
which is a claim snit never seems to prove.
You are one hell of a liar.
Some of us are well aware of this. Others have to learn this about him
the hard way. By the time they realize they've been snookered, and
snookered well, it's already too late.
Yea.
Experience is the best teacher.
In some cases.
Snit's been trolling for decades and he knows how to rope people into his snit rodeo.
People as a rule tend to be trusting and snit relies on that characteristic to
run
his troll farm.
How do you live with yourself?
Sadly, you're completely wasting your time. The majority of the regulars >>> here are all well aware of him and generally ignore him. He thrives on
any responses. even the negative ones. It allows him to repeat himself,
ad nausem. It's the attention he seeks, good or bad, it's the attention. >>> You're actually contributing to his efforts by calling him out. It took
me a bit of time to come to this realization myself. I was warned by
another new comer at the time to the newsgroup what he was actually
about, but, I didn't listen to the sound advice. I engaged and defended
myself. Which is exactly what Snit wanted - I was feeding him. Just as
you presently are.
None of snits so called 'evidence' backs his claims and they never will. >>> He completely fabricated a story about me and then morphed what he did.
At no time does he accept any responsibility for what he writes. It's
always the other person. Always. You cannot reason with Snit. It's not
why he's here. It's just the attention he seeks, and as long as you
respond, you're giving him exactly what he wants.
I've had some down time recently and for lack of any better way to waste
my time I decided to check out some of snit's claims against you, Gremlin, >> Steve Carroll and Pothead and after thoroughly visiting the links and
Message ID's that snit posted it quickly became obvious that snit is lying >> and his links by any reasonable interpretation have absolutely zero
confirmation of his claims.
Several other posters have reached the same conclusions.
Snit's tactic is to toss everything possible at the wall and see
what sticks.
So far nothing is sticking as even his supporters, all 2 of them, refuse
to back snit.
Examples include his claims you had the source code to snit's flooding
bot.
Snit's horrid reading comprehension strikes again and once snit is proved
to be obviously wrong, instead of a polite mea culpa he will double
down on his lies.
Steve Carroll stating the .gov site claimed snit had an order of
protection filed against him by his ex wife Anne Glasser.
It was pure speculation on Steve Carroll's part, a what if, and Steve
Carroll clearly said that.
That is true.
Someone posted a screenshot of snit's criminal harassment case.
Others saw it while it was on the gov site before it was removed.
Snit can deny this all he likes but the facts prove him wrong. They always do.
Pothead being a racist bigot. Not even close. Snit fed list of statements
Pothead has made, like people who are not legal citizens of the U.S. ,
should not be given Medicaid, free cell phones and things like that.
Whoopee Einstein.
The vast majority of Americans believe the same thing.
Are they bigots and racists, white supremacists as well?
That's snit's faulty logic in action.
Pretty much.
Snit gets all wound up when the topic of people leeching off the government is broached.
And that's because he is one of the government leeches himself.
Snit has been scamming the US government for years.
He refuses to work but instead expects the working taxpayers to finance him and his trolling.
Some of us have found that not directly responding to him, but
discussing him, as i'm doing with you irks him to no end - to the point
where other newsgroups have relieved themselves of him. If he can't get
the attention and the back and forth bullshit, he pisses off -
eventually. I strongly encourage you to proceed as the majority of us
have been doing.
Snit responds to me even though I rarely respond to him.
He is scored down in pan.
He seems to crave attention even when it is negative.
That seems obtuse to me.
Snit would eat dog poop on a live stream if he was assured it would get him attention.
He's basically a lunatic with serious mental problems.
I'm guilty recently of having directly responded to some of his nonsense >>> -
He likes to bait people into responses by doing what you've seen him
repeatedly do towards Pothead. He will continue to bait you as well. A
response is what he seeks, and he'll play this game with you until you
catch onto what's up and treat him as he should be - not directly
responded to, but discussed amongst ourselves.
That's how snit operates.
IMHO there is nothing wrong with correcting his lies, and there are plenty >> to correct.
It would be a full time job!
And for those of you who snit has used your real name, you have a very
good legal case against snit for defamation.
Nyms like Pothead or mine Glock have less of a case unless that nym is
well known on blogs, as a digital creator and situations like that.
That doesn't apply to me but maybe to Pothead, I can't say.
He seems like he laughs off snit and finds snit entertaining.
Again, just an observation.
I find his accusations against me to be highly entertaining.
From the day he started his little Google seed game, it's been a
primer in how snit morphs his stories, changes his statements and lies profusely.
So in my case, I went from supporting Hitler to using white supremacist rhetoric.
It's laughable and I actually have saved the msg-ids documenting how snit kept
changing and morphing his story.
I'm saving it for a rainy day when with some additional information I'll lower
the boom on snit.
He will latch onto this reply of mine and do the same thing you've
already seen with Pothead. Feel free to check out his so called
'receipts' towards me - You'll find it's the same thing he's been doing
with Pothead. He gets off on doing this shit. Eventually you'll see this >>> for yourself, if you haven't already started to suspect it. He knows
what he posts about Pothead, Steve Carroll (SC), myself, and others is
all bullshit - it doesn't matter to him as long as a response is coming.
100% true.
The regulars in the gun groups that snit infiltrated spotted this early
on.
It's how snit rolls.
Snit is ignorant but even he won't mess with gun enthusiasts.
He baits people into responding, to call him out. He really doesn't care >>> that you do. He's only interested in a response from you. He has a
severe problem with reading comprehension as well - I suspect you've
noticed that already.
I've noticed that.
Most of Usenet, technical discussions excepted, is about an 8th grade
reading level so it's sad that snit fails so often to comprehend what he
is reading and replying to.
Snit's reading comprehension ability is 3rd grade level on a good day.
He claims to have multiple college degrees which I find interesting.
And when he fucks up he rarely makes a full apology but somehow manages to >> drag others into his apology.
It's weird.
Snit is a very strange duck.
Here's some additional links you might find of interest. You can
actually sample nearly any post from him and match it up to the snitlies >>> methods link. He's that well known and his method is that well known.
He's been doing this for decades and has no intentions of stopping. When >>> enough people ignore him, he pisses off to yet another newsgroup and
starts his bullshit all over again. It's what he does.
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods> >>>>> <https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-teddybear> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitonduck> >>>>> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitongoogle>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse1>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse2>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse3>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse4>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse5>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse6>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse7>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse8>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse9>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse10>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse11>
Those links explain exactly what kind of person he is and why he does
what he does. Your efforts to call him out for the lies he repeatedly
writes about others is noble, but, it's ignored by him. It allows him to >>> do what he's doing. It's best not to respond directly to him. It's not
always easy though, especially when you have him dead to rights lying
his ass off. He will just play stupid and repeat himself. The thing is,
he's not playing stupid. He is rather stupid.
Snit hates those links because he knows most of what is written about him is true.
It's actually hilarious when snit claims nobody can quote his lies or poor >> behavior.
He is delusional.
Whatever drugs he is taking must be quite potent.
Word is that snit is addicted to jenkem.
He has also been known to huff glue so at this point his brain is probably fried.
| Sysop: | DaiTengu |
|---|---|
| Location: | Appleton, WI |
| Users: | 1,089 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 153:50:21 |
| Calls: | 13,921 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 187,021 |
| D/L today: |
3,754 files (944M bytes) |
| Messages: | 2,457,163 |
