On Dec 2, 2025 at 3:28:40 PM MST, "Name" wrote <1vuimufhzswew.1dm2i59bwq4up.dlg@40tude.net>:
On 01 Dec 2025 18:18:43 GMT, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Dec 1, 2025 at 10:37:23 AM MST, "Johnson" wrote
<MPG.43979c5b23dc53cf9896bd@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <692dc63f$2$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Nov 30, 2025 at 8:37:46 PM MST, "Johnson" wrote
<MPG.4396d79513dd1a9e9896bc@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <692d03e3$1$21958$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Nov 30, 2025 at 6:40:37 PM MST, "Johnson" wrote
<MPG.4396bc1f1e66d17b9896b7@usnews.blocknews.net>:
...
Trump is clearly far worse. But you are very biased.
Biased?
How do you figure that?
You make up claims about people being "Communists" and ignore we have an
actual fascist oligarch pushing echoes of Nazi Germany in the White House.
<https://www.newsweek.com/intersectional-communist-zohran->
mamdani-shows-democrats-cant-quit-obamaism-opinion-
2100518>
<https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/7/15/trump-says->
cuomo-should-stay-in-new-york-city-mayor-race-against-
mamdani>
<https://stefanik.house.gov/2025/9/icymi-stefanik-slammed->
kathy-hochul-on-fox-friends-for-endorsing-communist-
zohran-mamdani-for-nyc-mayor>
<https://www.catholicleague.org/mamdanis-communist-roots/>
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2025/jun/26/donald-trump/Zohran-Mamdani-democratic-socialist-communist-NYC/
Politifact?
Yes. Fact checking. It matters. But that is MY view. Remember: I back equal
rights, the environment, and evidence based policies. In debates I back using
evidence and facts. This, I am told, makes me "liberal".
Keep in mind the main differences between liberal and conservative world >> views:
* Liberals: support equal rights and environmental protection, with a focus on
investing in the future and building a stronger tie between productivity and
financial reward.
Liberals want evidence-based regulation and oversight to help ensure clean air
and water, safe food, and human rights. This includes following the scientific
evidence about climate change and food safety, and things like setting levels
of lead and other harmful substances allowed, and even to wanting to do
research to reduce the harm of tools such as cars and guns and swimming pools.
This is a form of control, and conservatives are right to note that. And they
are right to note that sometimes these measures are taken too far.
* Conservative: support special entitlements for whites, Christians, males,
heterosexuals, those in lower populated states, and the wealthy, with a focus
on redistributing wealth to the very richest in the nation with the idea that
this will somehow help others.
Conservatives want regulation and oversight based on their own feelings and
what they believe has historically existed (which is often incorrect), or even
just based on their own religion. This includes controlling which consenting
adults can marry each other, what a woman can do with her own body, and even
insisting the government gets to define YOUR gender. They also work to create
regulations on voting to limit who can vote, for if the people truly get a >> voice they know their ideas are less likely to be accepted. Liberals are right
to call conservatives out on this also being a form of control and, I think, a
less defensible one.
I snipped your rants. I am interested in EVIDENCE. Your emotion is not a >> concern to me (in this context).
You snipped what Jonson wrote
As I said. Sure. I am interested in evidence. Not mindless emotional rants.
In article <692f6d66$1$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Dec 2, 2025 at 3:28:40 PM MST, "Name" wrote
<1vuimufhzswew.1dm2i59bwq4up.dlg@40tude.net>:
On 01 Dec 2025 18:18:43 GMT, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Dec 1, 2025 at 10:37:23 AM MST, "Johnson" wrote
<MPG.43979c5b23dc53cf9896bd@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <692dc63f$2$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Nov 30, 2025 at 8:37:46 PM MST, "Johnson" wrote
<MPG.4396d79513dd1a9e9896bc@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <692d03e3$1$21958$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Nov 30, 2025 at 6:40:37 PM MST, "Johnson" wrote
<MPG.4396bc1f1e66d17b9896b7@usnews.blocknews.net>:
...
Trump is clearly far worse. But you are very biased.
Biased?
How do you figure that?
You make up claims about people being "Communists" and ignore we have an
actual fascist oligarch pushing echoes of Nazi Germany in the White House.
<https://www.newsweek.com/intersectional-communist-zohran->
mamdani-shows-democrats-cant-quit-obamaism-opinion-
2100518>
<https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/7/15/trump-says->
cuomo-should-stay-in-new-york-city-mayor-race-against-
mamdani>
<https://stefanik.house.gov/2025/9/icymi-stefanik-slammed->
kathy-hochul-on-fox-friends-for-endorsing-communist-
zohran-mamdani-for-nyc-mayor>
<https://www.catholicleague.org/mamdanis-communist-roots/>
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2025/jun/26/donald-trump/Zohran-Mamdani-democratic-socialist-communist-NYC/
Politifact?
Yes. Fact checking. It matters. But that is MY view. Remember: I back equal
rights, the environment, and evidence based policies. In debates I back using
evidence and facts. This, I am told, makes me "liberal".
Keep in mind the main differences between liberal and conservative world >>>> views:
* Liberals: support equal rights and environmental protection, with a focus on
investing in the future and building a stronger tie between productivity and
financial reward.
Liberals want evidence-based regulation and oversight to help ensure clean air
and water, safe food, and human rights. This includes following the scientific
evidence about climate change and food safety, and things like setting levels
of lead and other harmful substances allowed, and even to wanting to do >>>> research to reduce the harm of tools such as cars and guns and swimming pools.
This is a form of control, and conservatives are right to note that. And they
are right to note that sometimes these measures are taken too far.
* Conservative: support special entitlements for whites, Christians, males,
heterosexuals, those in lower populated states, and the wealthy, with a focus
on redistributing wealth to the very richest in the nation with the idea that
this will somehow help others.
Conservatives want regulation and oversight based on their own feelings and
what they believe has historically existed (which is often incorrect), or even
just based on their own religion. This includes controlling which consenting
adults can marry each other, what a woman can do with her own body, and even
insisting the government gets to define YOUR gender. They also work to create
regulations on voting to limit who can vote, for if the people truly get a >>>> voice they know their ideas are less likely to be accepted. Liberals are right
to call conservatives out on this also being a form of control and, I think, a
less defensible one.
I snipped your rants. I am interested in EVIDENCE. Your emotion is not a >>>> concern to me (in this context).
You snipped what Jonson wrote
As I said. Sure. I am interested in evidence. Not mindless emotional rants.
Original groups restored and your FUP to alt.test removed.
You are a dishonest person Brock.
PLONK!
In article <692f6d66$1$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
As I said. Sure. I am interested in evidence. Not mindless emotional
rants.
Original groups restored and your FUP to alt.test removed.
You are a dishonest person Brock.
PLONK!
David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared
with you.
This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing.
I am well aware that those who seek to attack do so out of their own weaknesses and insecurities. Even with those I disagree with, say
Gremlin and Carroll, I try to note good things about them... and am
sincere when I do so. And even when I am not nice in responding to
trolling I am honest, and I try to not sink to their level.
Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?
https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-city-tn/computer-stores
On Aug 12, 2020 at 12:19:32 AM MST, "David_B" <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?
https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-city-tn/computer-stores
Not there.
OK. Thanks for looking.
Please try here:-
https://www.yellowpages.com/kingsport-tn/computer-stores
121 results! Sorry there are so many to check.
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
Johnson <lostmyemail@quick.net> news:MPG.439a8813ebba5229896c1@usnews.blocknews.net Wed, 03 Dec 2025
22:47:38 GMT in comp.os.linux.advocacy, wrote:
In article <692f6d66$1$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
As I said. Sure. I am interested in evidence. Not mindless emotional
rants.
Original groups restored and your FUP to alt.test removed.
You are a dishonest person Brock.
PLONK!
Yes, he is. A very dishonest person.
Johnson <lostmyemail@quick.net> news:MPG.439a8813ebba5229896c1@usnews.blocknews.net Wed, 03 Dec 2025
22:47:38 GMT in comp.os.linux.advocacy, wrote:
In article <692f6d66$1$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
As I said. Sure. I am interested in evidence. Not mindless emotional
rants.
Original groups restored and your FUP to alt.test removed.
You are a dishonest person Brock.
PLONK!
Yes, he is. A very dishonest person. And a mooch on society. US tax payers are responsible for his upkeep. He doesn't work for a living to support himself. US tax payers cover his expenses and have for years. He denies
this is the case, but, aside from him being a very well known liar, he is
on usenet at all hours of the day and night to much to be able to work for
a living. He doesn't factor that in when he denies what's obvious - that
he gets a check and US tax payers are the ones who provide it.
We literally pay for him to troll usenet. We pay for the gear for him to
do it. We are most likely also covering the internet and electrical
expenses as well. Unless he's leeching those services from someone else -
I wouldn't put that past him based on his well known history. And, we pay
for the fuckers food and housing as well. We're paying for all of it and
he's laughing his ass off as we do.
Grifting is what he and his former wife (she recently divorced him and he
was arrested for stalking her but the charges were eventually dismissed.
Snit lied about having been arrested for it!) have decades of experience
in. No doubt his children have been raised to do the same thing. To repeat the cycle. Snit recently admitted one is 18 years old and the other is now 20. I have very little doubt that they are doing the same thing they've
grown up seeing their mom and dad do the entire time they've been alive.
He has no interest whatsoever in evidence. Here's a damn good and very
simple to follow example of that:
From: Gremlin <nobody@haph.org>
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,talk.pol itics.guns,alt.comp.os.windows-10 Subject: Snit lies about helping Stalker David Brooks (again) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 22:28:05 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 99
Message-ID: <XnsAC1EBCDCA8A47HT1@0ydV5Cg6OLqWT90unHZ34QVT6yqk8KnKb.nd> Injection-Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 22:28:05 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="068b1a5346d9b021edae41f686d7558a";
logging-data="11375";
mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
posting-account="U2FsdGV
kX19HznPapNIRMQ+0+xsNFEMfW5v1sDHBgDY="
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
Cancel-Lock: sha1:b0ftxRAkxuB/uDQTbdDe6U6KgIE=
Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org alt.computer.workshop:56106 comp.os.linux.advocacy:799858 comp.sys.mac.advocacy:237345 talk.politics.guns:1355046 alt.comp.os.windows-10:125024
MID: <hq2g4cFrde3U9@mid.individual.net>
I wrote this:
David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared
with you.
And you responded with this:
This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing.
Which is a problem, for you:
Message-ID: <9KMYG.136546$hs5.63426@fx05.ams1>
From: David_B <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org>
Message-ID: <9KMYG.136546$hs5.63426@fx05.ams1>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@blocknews.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 07:19:33 UTC
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:19:32 +0100
I am well aware that those who seek to attack do so out of their own weaknesses and insecurities. Even with those I disagree with, say
Gremlin and Carroll, I try to note good things about them... and am
sincere when I do so. And even when I am not nice in responding to
trolling I am honest, and I try to not sink to their level.
Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?
https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-city-tn/computer-stores
Message-ID: <hphkj5Fkie0U3@mid.individual.net>
From: Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Re: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !!
Date: 12 Aug 2020 07:38:13 GMT
Message-ID: <hphkj5Fkie0U3@mid.individual.net>
References: <MPG.399afb30dee85d4b989691@nntp.aioe.org> <XaMYG.135634$Ai5.61414@fx30.ams1> <hphicvFkie0U1@mid.individual.net> <9KMYG.136546$hs5.63426@fx05.ams1>
Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?
https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-city-tn/computer-stores
Not there.
Message-ID: <XJQYG.264806$dTb.89649@fx41.ams1>
From: David_B <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@blocknews.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:52:23 UTC
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:52:23 +0100
On 12/08/2020 08:38, Snit wrote:
On Aug 12, 2020 at 12:19:32 AM MST, "David_B" <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?
https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-city-tn/computer-stores
Not there.
OK. Thanks for looking.
Please try here:- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingsport-tn/computer-stores
Message-ID: <hpio33Fkie0U14@mid.individual.net>
From: Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Re: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !!
Date: 12 Aug 2020 17:44:03 GMT
Message-ID: <hpio33Fkie0U14@mid.individual.net>
References: <MPG.399afb30dee85d4b989691@nntp.aioe.org> <hphkj5Fkie0U3@mid.individual.net> <XJQYG.264806$dTb.89649@fx41.ams1> <F7RYG.69875$8b2.3773@fx07.ams1>
On Aug 12, 2020 at 5:19:49 AM MST, "David_B" <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
OK. Thanks for looking.
Please try here:-
https://www.yellowpages.com/kingsport-tn/computer-stores
121 results! Sorry there are so many to check.
Not a big deal -- just five pages. Did a search for the last four
digits... no matches.
*** end share
See? he *lies his ass off* about the dumbest shit possible. Refuses to apologize for any of it. Instead, he doubles down on the bullshit. All to keep his snit circuit going.
There was no 'direct lie' on my part. There was no lie of any kind. David Brooks did exactly as I'd written and Snit did attempt to assist him in
his stalking efforts towards me.
If and when you do get an 'apology' of any kind, it'll be as generic as he can possibly write it addressing nobody specifically he lied about and not
so much as mentioning what he's specifically apologizing for having done. Days later, he did exactly that regarding those posts. Didn't address the false accusation towards me AS he dismissed what David asked him to do as 'research' - when no mention of the word research was even so much as implied. Infact, the apology was directed to nobody specific and didn't
cover anything he actually did. He didn't take any accountability for
falsely stating that I'd written a direct lie or that David actually did
as I wrote.
Snit wrote two lines in his reply, as you can see, and *BOTH OF THEM* were lies on his part.
It's what he does. He's been pulling this shit for so long, that's why
these urls exist:
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
People don't take the time to create the content you can find at those
urls unless you go well out of your way to earn it. All of the above urls
are factual concerning him. I've never met anyone else online or in real
life who is despised anywhere near the level Snit Brock McNuggets Michael
Lee Glasser the Prescott computer guy is.
So I've rambled enough for now so I again say thanks for
the explanation of this Brock ass-clown.
On 08/12/2025 23:07, Johnson wrote:
So I've rambled enough for now so I again say thanks for
the explanation of this Brock ass-clown.
You are responding to a someone who is a well known VXer!
You also wrote complete bollocks, Jim :-P
In article <XnsB3AEDCBCD978HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>,
nobody@haph.org says...
It's what he does. He's been pulling this shit for so long, that's why
these urls exist:
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
People don't take the time to create the content you can find at those
urls unless you go well out of your way to earn it. All of the above urls
are factual concerning him. I've never met anyone else online or in real
life who is despised anywhere near the level Snit Brock McNuggets Michael
Lee Glasser the Prescott computer guy is.
Thank you sir gremlin for explaining the modus operandi of
this Brock joker to me as TBH I've never in all my years
on USENET encountered a USENET kook as severely brain
damaged as this Brock specimen.
And I've seen most everything since I have been reading
and posting to USENET since the mid-late 80's.
I'm generally a person who sides with the underdog in a
confrontation be it sports, debating or politics.
I spotted this Brock person in another group and found his
posts quite intriguing, mostly because he appeared to be
quite diligent in posting proof to validate his claims
whereas others were not doing the same.
So for lack of anything else to do, I began checking
Brock's posted proof against his claims and at first I
assumed the initial couple of links might have been in
error as they had nothing to do with Brock's claims.
So, it didn't take me long to realize that Brock's links
were total hokum.
And some of his claims were outright lies. When he is
challenged he calls people socks yet he never shows any
evidence to prove those claims.
I was intrigued by his claims against you so I compared
Brock's links against your links it was at that point I
began to figure out that this Brock poster is an ass-
clown. Excuse the French as my mum used to say.
Brock somehow manages to point back to his own posts as
proof of unrelated statements.
Kind of odd in my opinion.
Another trick he uses is to distort what others post.
One example I have seen multiple times is if say you or I
post "I don't understand why you act like a fool".
Brock will twist that in a reply and say something like "I
see that you don't understand. It's good that you realize
this", while leaving out the context of the original post.
My personal conclusion is that either Brock has a reading
disability or he is being dishonest. I lean towards the
latter.
Brock also seems to have a man crush, hard-on for Pothead
as well. At first I thought that Pothead was that Steve
poster who snit stalks but the writing styles are
different so I doubt that is the case.
I find it interesting that Brock keeps attacking Pothead
and accusing him of being a white supremacist while
posting his so called proof at every opportunity.
It's four or five MID's I think and I checked out each one
and they in no way show Pothead as being a white
supremacist.
Apparently snit fed a collection of statements that
Pothead may or may not have made into some AI machine and
it determined that white supremacists often say similar
statements so using an illogical conclusion Brock assumes
Pothead must also be a white supremacist.
That level of logic is extremely poor but evidently Brock
believes it despite the conclusions he reached being
faulty.
So I've rambled enough for now so I again say thanks for
the explanation of this Brock ass-clown.
It's what he does. He's been pulling this shit for so long, that's why
these urls exist:
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
People don't take the time to create the content you can find at those
urls unless you go well out of your way to earn it. All of the above
urls are factual concerning him. I've never met anyone else online or
in real life who is despised anywhere near the level Snit Brock
McNuggets Michael Lee Glasser the Prescott computer guy is.
Thank you sir gremlin for explaining the modus operandi of
this Brock joker to me as TBH I've never in all my years
on USENET encountered a USENET kook as severely brain
damaged as this Brock specimen.
And I've seen most everything since I have been reading
and posting to USENET since the mid-late 80's.
I'm generally a person who sides with the underdog in a
confrontation be it sports, debating or politics.
I spotted this Brock person in another group and found his
posts quite intriguing, mostly because he appeared to be
quite diligent in posting proof to validate his claims
whereas others were not doing the same.
So for lack of anything else to do, I began checking
Brock's posted proof against his claims and at first I
assumed the initial couple of links might have been in
error as they had nothing to do with Brock's claims.
So, it didn't take me long to realize that Brock's links
were total hokum.
And some of his claims were outright lies. When he is
challenged he calls people socks yet he never shows any
evidence to prove those claims.
I was intrigued by his claims against you so I compared
Brock's links against your links it was at that point I
began to figure out that this Brock poster is an ass-
clown. Excuse the French as my mum used to say.
Brock somehow manages to point back to his own posts as
proof of unrelated statements.
Kind of odd in my opinion.
Another trick he uses is to distort what others post.
One example I have seen multiple times is if say you or I
post "I don't understand why you act like a fool".
Brock will twist that in a reply and say something like "I
see that you don't understand.
It's good that you realize
this", while leaving out the context of the original post.
My personal conclusion is that either Brock has a reading
disability or he is being dishonest. I lean towards the
latter.
Brock also seems to have a man crush, hard-on for Pothead
as well. At first I thought that Pothead was that Steve
poster who snit stalks but the writing styles are
different so I doubt that is the case.
I find it interesting that Brock keeps attacking Pothead
and accusing him of being a white supremacist while
posting his so called proof at every opportunity.
It's four or five MID's I think and I checked out each one
and they in no way show Pothead as being a white
supremacist.
Apparently snit fed a collection of statements that
Pothead may or may not have made into some AI machine and
it determined that white supremacists often say similar
statements so using an illogical conclusion Brock assumes
Pothead must also be a white supremacist.
That level of logic is extremely poor but evidently Brock
believes it despite the conclusions he reached being
faulty.
So I've rambled enough for now so I again say thanks for
the explanation of this Brock ass-clown.
On 08/12/2025 23:07, Johnson wrote:
So I've rambled enough for now so I again say thanks for
the explanation of this Brock ass-clown.
You are responding to a someone who is a well known VXer!
You also wrote complete bollocks, Jim :-P
"David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mpp4hfF426aU1@mid.individual.net Mon, 08 Dec 2025 23:15:59 GMT in comp.os.linux.advocacy, wrote:
On 08/12/2025 23:07, Johnson wrote:
So I've rambled enough for now so I again say thanks for
the explanation of this Brock ass-clown.
You are responding to a someone who is a well known VXer!
I'm a well known former VXer, as in exVXer, David. I have been for nearly twenty six years now. That's well known and public information, too. Can you possibly be anymore dishonest?
You also wrote complete bollocks, Jim :-P
ROFL! You do wish that was the case, David. It's not though. You can't cover for snit, you can't rebrand him as anything other than what he is. The truth won't allow it. No matter how desperately hard you try.
I answered my own question above. You most certainly can. Too funny.
BTW, I restored the previously existing newsgroups line. Any particular reason you opted to remove acw from your reply? :) What were you trying to hide, David? Snit did the same thing. I already know what he's about. Why
are you emulating him so hard?
Johnson <lostmyemail@quick.net> news:MPG.43a12439ad746f409896c6@usnews.blocknews.net Mon, 08 Dec 2025 23:07:22 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
It's what he does. He's been pulling this shit for so long, that's why
these urls exist:
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
People don't take the time to create the content you can find at those
urls unless you go well out of your way to earn it. All of the above
urls are factual concerning him. I've never met anyone else online or
in real life who is despised anywhere near the level Snit Brock
McNuggets Michael Lee Glasser the Prescott computer guy is.
Thank you sir gremlin for explaining the modus operandi of
this Brock joker to me as TBH I've never in all my years
on USENET encountered a USENET kook as severely brain
damaged as this Brock specimen.
Neither have I. If you have noticed, he's recently claiming that he wrote
the aimbot (the one he's been so pleased with the AIs reviews of) entirely
on his own.
On Dec 9, 2025 at 6:37:12 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote <XnsB3B0D1C21D048HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:
"David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mpp4hfF426aU1@mid.individual.net Mon, 08 >> Dec 2025 23:15:59 GMT in comp.os.linux.advocacy, wrote:
On 08/12/2025 23:07, Johnson wrote:
So I've rambled enough for now so I again say thanks for
the explanation of this Brock ass-clown.
You are responding to a someone who is a well known VXer!
I'm a well known former VXer, as in exVXer, David. I have been for nearly
twenty six years now. That's well known and public information, too. Can you >> possibly be anymore dishonest?
You also wrote complete bollocks, Jim :-P
ROFL! You do wish that was the case, David. It's not though. You can't cover >> for snit, you can't rebrand him as anything other than what he is. The truth >> won't allow it. No matter how desperately hard you try.
I answered my own question above. You most certainly can. Too funny.
BTW, I restored the previously existing newsgroups line. Any particular
reason you opted to remove acw from your reply? :) What were you trying to >> hide, David? Snit did the same thing. I already know what he's about. Why
are you emulating him so hard?
There is an effort to leave behind the nonsense of the past. Can you join those of us moving forward in peace?
On 10 Dec 2025 01:49:49 GMT, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Dec 9, 2025 at 6:37:12 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote
<XnsB3B0D1C21D048HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:
"David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mpp4hfF426aU1@mid.individual.net Mon, 08 >>> Dec 2025 23:15:59 GMT in comp.os.linux.advocacy, wrote:
On 08/12/2025 23:07, Johnson wrote:
So I've rambled enough for now so I again say thanks for
the explanation of this Brock ass-clown.
You are responding to a someone who is a well known VXer!
I'm a well known former VXer, as in exVXer, David. I have been for nearly >>> twenty six years now. That's well known and public information, too. Can you
possibly be anymore dishonest?
You also wrote complete bollocks, Jim :-P
ROFL! You do wish that was the case, David. It's not though. You can't cover
for snit, you can't rebrand him as anything other than what he is. The truth
won't allow it. No matter how desperately hard you try.
I answered my own question above. You most certainly can. Too funny.
BTW, I restored the previously existing newsgroups line. Any particular
reason you opted to remove acw from your reply? :) What were you trying to >>> hide, David? Snit did the same thing. I already know what he's about. Why >>> are you emulating him so hard?
There is an effort to leave behind the nonsense of the past. Can you join
those of us moving forward in peace?
Consider offering a sincere apology to the individuals you have
previously criticized or misrepresented, clearly acknowledging that
these actions were made in error and taking full responsibility for
them.
While I cannot speak on behalf of those affected, it seems reasonable
to believe that such an approach may encourage others to move on and
may be an important step toward restoring your reputation and moving
forward.
It's your move Brock.
On 10 Dec 2025 01:49:49 GMT, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Dec 9, 2025 at 6:37:12 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote
<XnsB3B0D1C21D048HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:
"David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mpp4hfF426aU1@mid.individual.net Mon, 08 >>> Dec 2025 23:15:59 GMT in comp.os.linux.advocacy, wrote:
On 08/12/2025 23:07, Johnson wrote:
So I've rambled enough for now so I again say thanks for
the explanation of this Brock ass-clown.
You are responding to a someone who is a well known VXer!
I'm a well known former VXer, as in exVXer, David. I have been for nearly >>> twenty six years now. That's well known and public information, too. Can you
possibly be anymore dishonest?
You also wrote complete bollocks, Jim :-P
ROFL! You do wish that was the case, David. It's not though. You can't cover
for snit, you can't rebrand him as anything other than what he is. The truth
won't allow it. No matter how desperately hard you try.
I answered my own question above. You most certainly can. Too funny.
BTW, I restored the previously existing newsgroups line. Any particular
reason you opted to remove acw from your reply? :) What were you trying to >>> hide, David? Snit did the same thing. I already know what he's about. Why >>> are you emulating him so hard?
There is an effort to leave behind the nonsense of the past. Can you join
those of us moving forward in peace?
Consider offering a sincere apology to the individuals you have
previously criticized or misrepresented, clearly acknowledging that
these actions were made in error and taking full responsibility for
them.
While I cannot speak on behalf of those affected, it seems reasonable
to believe that such an approach may encourage others to move on and
may be an important step toward restoring your reputation and moving
forward.
It's your move Brock.
On 10 Dec 2025 01:49:49 GMT, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Dec 9, 2025 at 6:37:12 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote
<XnsB3B0D1C21D048HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:
"David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mpp4hfF426aU1@mid.individual.net
Mon, 08 Dec 2025 23:15:59 GMT in comp.os.linux.advocacy, wrote:
On 08/12/2025 23:07, Johnson wrote:
So I've rambled enough for now so I again say thanks for
the explanation of this Brock ass-clown.
You are responding to a someone who is a well known VXer!
I'm a well known former VXer, as in exVXer, David. I have been for
nearly twenty six years now. That's well known and public information,
too. Can you possibly be anymore dishonest?
You also wrote complete bollocks, Jim :-P
ROFL! You do wish that was the case, David. It's not though. You can't
cover for snit, you can't rebrand him as anything other than what he
is. The truth won't allow it. No matter how desperately hard you try.
I answered my own question above. You most certainly can. Too funny.
BTW, I restored the previously existing newsgroups line. Any
particular reason you opted to remove acw from your reply? :) What
were you trying to hide, David? Snit did the same thing. I already
know what he's about. Why are you emulating him so hard?
There is an effort to leave behind the nonsense of the past. Can you
join those of us moving forward in peace?
Consider offering a sincere apology to the individuals you have
previously criticized or misrepresented, clearly acknowledging that
these actions were made in error and taking full responsibility for
them.
While I cannot speak on behalf of those affected, it seems reasonable
to believe that such an approach may encourage others to move on and
may be an important step toward restoring your reputation and moving
forward.
It's your move Brock.
On Dec 9, 2025 at 6:37:12 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote <XnsB3B0D1C21D048HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:
"David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mpp4hfF426aU1@mid.individual.net
Mon, 08 Dec 2025 23:15:59 GMT in comp.os.linux.advocacy, wrote:
On 08/12/2025 23:07, Johnson wrote:
So I've rambled enough for now so I again say thanks for
the explanation of this Brock ass-clown.
You are responding to a someone who is a well known VXer!
I'm a well known former VXer, as in exVXer, David. I have been for
nearly twenty six years now. That's well known and public information,
too. Can you possibly be anymore dishonest?
You also wrote complete bollocks, Jim :-P
ROFL! You do wish that was the case, David. It's not though. You can't
cover for snit, you can't rebrand him as anything other than what he
is. The truth won't allow it. No matter how desperately hard you try.
I answered my own question above. You most certainly can. Too funny.
BTW, I restored the previously existing newsgroups line. Any particular
reason you opted to remove acw from your reply? :) What were you trying
to hide, David? Snit did the same thing. I already know what he's
about. Why are you emulating him so hard?
There is an effort to leave behind the nonsense of the past. Can you
join those of us moving forward in peace?
On Dec 9, 2025 at 6:36:50 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote <XnsB3B0D1B211E21HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:
Johnson <lostmyemail@quick.net>
news:MPG.43a12439ad746f409896c6@usnews.blocknews.net Mon, 08 Dec 2025
23:07:22 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
It's what he does. He's been pulling this shit for so long, that's
why these urls exist:
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
People don't take the time to create the content you can find at
those urls unless you go well out of your way to earn it. All of the
above urls are factual concerning him. I've never met anyone else
online or in real life who is despised anywhere near the level Snit
Brock McNuggets Michael Lee Glasser the Prescott computer guy is.
Thank you sir gremlin for explaining the modus operandi of
this Brock joker to me as TBH I've never in all my years
on USENET encountered a USENET kook as severely brain
damaged as this Brock specimen.
Neither have I. If you have noticed, he's recently claiming that he
wrote the aimbot (the one he's been so pleased with the AIs reviews of)
entirely on his own.
I have been very clear with my getting minor input from others. But that still does not make it anything other than my work.
I would love to see you and Carroll carry through with your past
statements and try your own. Maybe we can all move to an IRC channel -- though I would need to use my newer one. It has many of the same
features, though, so would work much the same.
I continued to read for a bit and saw where you denied I made my own
bot.
but I *AM* interested in tech.
I am quite proud of my old AIM chatbot and it was
one of the best ones of the era. You and Carroll get the benefit of some
of my ideas and techniques -- the "reaction" scores (per participant),
it having "patience" and "rush mode", deciding who is "worthy", typing
speed emulation, etc.
But that is OK. If you guys use some of my ideas, and some of your own,
and make a better one that is GOOD. I would love to see how it works.
Would love to see others learn from my work and do better themselves.
And Carroll, at the very least, is clearly a better coder than I am.
With my understanding of the human side and his understanding of coding
and your understanding of some of the hardware level efficiency stuff
(not sure how needed that would be, but still good to have), we could
really do something pretty cool.
That would be much better -- in my view -- than finding ways to attack
each other.
Are you game?
On Dec 9, 2025 at 8:05:24 PM MST, "Nobody" wrote <6938e373$3$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
Consider offering a sincere apology to the individuals you have
previously criticized or misrepresented, clearly acknowledging that
these actions were made in error and taking full responsibility for
them.
While I cannot speak on behalf of those affected, it seems reasonable
to believe that such an approach may encourage others to move on and
may be an important step toward restoring your reputation and moving
forward.
It's your move Brock.
Have a MID or quote where you think I did wrong? If I did wrong I will apologize. Sure.
David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared
with you.
I am well aware that those who seek to attack do so out of their own weaknesses and insecurities. Even with those I disagree with, say
Gremlin and Carroll, I try to note good things about them... and am
sincere when I do so. And even when I am not nice in responding to
trolling I am honest, and I try to not sink to their level.
Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?
https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-city-tn/computer-stores
On Aug 12, 2020 at 12:19:32 AM MST, "David_B" <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?
https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-city-tn/computer-stores
Not there.
OK. Thanks for looking.
Please try here:-
https://www.yellowpages.com/kingsport-tn/computer-stores
121 results! Sorry there are so many to check.
Remember, I am the one who says we should ALL accept personal
responsibility. That of course includes me. And I have no exception any
of these who troll me would ever do the same. I think that is the real
issue you folks have -- you know I will not sink to your level. Ever.
On 2025-12-08, Johnson <lostmyemail@quick.net> wrote:
In article <XnsB3AEDCBCD978HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>,
nobody@haph.org says...
It's what he does. He's been pulling this shit for so long, that's why
these urls exist:
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
People don't take the time to create the content you can find at those
urls unless you go well out of your way to earn it. All of the above urls >>> are factual concerning him. I've never met anyone else online or in real >>> life who is despised anywhere near the level Snit Brock McNuggets Michael >>> Lee Glasser the Prescott computer guy is.
Thank you sir gremlin for explaining the modus operandi of
this Brock joker to me as TBH I've never in all my years
on USENET encountered a USENET kook as severely brain
damaged as this Brock specimen.
And I've seen most everything since I have been reading
and posting to USENET since the mid-late 80's.
I'm generally a person who sides with the underdog in a
confrontation be it sports, debating or politics.
I spotted this Brock person in another group and found his
posts quite intriguing, mostly because he appeared to be
quite diligent in posting proof to validate his claims
whereas others were not doing the same.
So for lack of anything else to do, I began checking
Brock's posted proof against his claims and at first I
assumed the initial couple of links might have been in
error as they had nothing to do with Brock's claims.
So, it didn't take me long to realize that Brock's links
were total hokum.
And some of his claims were outright lies. When he is
challenged he calls people socks yet he never shows any
evidence to prove those claims.
I was intrigued by his claims against you so I compared
Brock's links against your links it was at that point I
began to figure out that this Brock poster is an ass-
clown. Excuse the French as my mum used to say.
Brock somehow manages to point back to his own posts as
proof of unrelated statements.
Kind of odd in my opinion.
Another trick he uses is to distort what others post.
One example I have seen multiple times is if say you or I
post "I don't understand why you act like a fool".
Brock will twist that in a reply and say something like "I
see that you don't understand. It's good that you realize
this", while leaving out the context of the original post.
My personal conclusion is that either Brock has a reading
disability or he is being dishonest. I lean towards the
latter.
Brock also seems to have a man crush, hard-on for Pothead
as well. At first I thought that Pothead was that Steve
poster who snit stalks but the writing styles are
different so I doubt that is the case.
I find it interesting that Brock keeps attacking Pothead
and accusing him of being a white supremacist while
posting his so called proof at every opportunity.
It's four or five MID's I think and I checked out each one
and they in no way show Pothead as being a white
supremacist.
Apparently snit fed a collection of statements that
Pothead may or may not have made into some AI machine and
it determined that white supremacists often say similar
statements so using an illogical conclusion Brock assumes
Pothead must also be a white supremacist.
That level of logic is extremely poor but evidently Brock
believes it despite the conclusions he reached being
faulty.
So I've rambled enough for now so I again say thanks for
the explanation of this Brock ass-clown.
I snipped much of the post to keep it short and simple.
Gremlin is a good, extremely technically gifted poster.
As you have discovered, Brock (snit) is a piece of trailer trash
who is not only dishonest but a nasty piece of shit as well.
Brock (snit) picks his targets and then fires up his trolling
operation in order to attack them and create chaos within the group.
It's best to ignore this troll and never, ever, reply directly to him.
For extra credit search comp.sys.mac.advocacy or comp.os.linux.advocacy
for his snit nym and see what surfaces.
I won't be a spoiler but let me just hint that Brock (Snit) is
not well liked in either group.
Have a Merry Christmas or whatever holiday you celebrate.
some thing wrote:
There is an effort to leave behind the nonsense of the past. Can you join
those of us moving forward in peace?
Consider offering a sincere apology to the individuals you have
previously criticized or misrepresented, clearly acknowledging that
these actions were made in error and taking full responsibility for
them.
While I cannot speak on behalf of those affected, it seems reasonable
to believe that such an approach may encourage others to move on and
may be an important step toward restoring your reputation and moving
forward.
It's your move Brock.
Nobody wrote:
some thing wrote:
There is an effort to leave behind the nonsense of the past. Can you join >>> those of us moving forward in peace?
Consider offering a sincere apology to the individuals you have
previously criticized or misrepresented, clearly acknowledging that
these actions were made in error and taking full responsibility for
them.
While I cannot speak on behalf of those affected, it seems reasonable
to believe that such an approach may encourage others to move on and
may be an important step toward restoring your reputation and moving
forward.
It's your move Brock.
Man, that thing will never admit to its lies, which have been quoted
and documented literally *thousands* of times, over the years.
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> news:693908e6$1$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com Wed, 10 Dec 2025 05:45:10
GMT in comp.os.linux.advocacy, wrote:
On Dec 9, 2025 at 8:05:24 PM MST, "Nobody" wrote
<6938e373$3$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
Consider offering a sincere apology to the individuals you have
previously criticized or misrepresented, clearly acknowledging that
these actions were made in error and taking full responsibility for
them.
While I cannot speak on behalf of those affected, it seems reasonable
to believe that such an approach may encourage others to move on and
may be an important step toward restoring your reputation and moving
forward.
It's your move Brock.
Have a MID or quote where you think I did wrong? If I did wrong I will
apologize. Sure.
How about these for starters?
MID: <hq2g4cFrde3U9@mid.individual.net>
From: Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Re: Ha! Ads be gone!
Date: 18 Aug 2020 17:06:20 GMT
Message-ID: <hq2g4cFrde3U9@mid.individual.net>
On Aug 18, 2020 at 8:49:01 AM MST, "Gremlin" <nobody@haph.org> wrote:
David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared
with you.
This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing.
***
These are some of the posts between you and David Brooks doing exactly what
I wrote he did.
So, there was no direct lie on my part. There was no lie at all by me. And, David did exactly what I wrote about him doing:
Message-ID: <9KMYG.136546$hs5.63426@fx05.ams1>
From: David_B <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org>
Message-ID: <9KMYG.136546$hs5.63426@fx05.ams1>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@blocknews.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 07:19:33 UTC
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:19:32 +0100
I am well aware that those who seek to attack do so out of their own
weaknesses and insecurities. Even with those I disagree with, say
Gremlin and Carroll, I try to note good things about them... and am
sincere when I do so. And even when I am not nice in responding to
trolling I am honest, and I try to not sink to their level.
Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?
https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-city-tn/computer-stores
Message-ID: <hphkj5Fkie0U3@mid.individual.net>
From: Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Re: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !!
Date: 12 Aug 2020 07:38:13 GMT
Message-ID: <hphkj5Fkie0U3@mid.individual.net>
References: <MPG.399afb30dee85d4b989691@nntp.aioe.org> <XaMYG.135634$Ai5.61414@fx30.ams1> <hphicvFkie0U1@mid.individual.net> <9KMYG.136546$hs5.63426@fx05.ams1>
Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?
https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-city-tn/computer-stores
Not there.
Message-ID: <XJQYG.264806$dTb.89649@fx41.ams1>
From: David_B <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@blocknews.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:52:23 UTC
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:52:23 +0100
On 12/08/2020 08:38, Snit wrote:
On Aug 12, 2020 at 12:19:32 AM MST, "David_B" <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org>
wrote:
Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?
https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-city-tn/computer-stores
Not there.
OK. Thanks for looking.
Please try here:- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingsport-tn/computer-stores
Message-ID: <hpio33Fkie0U14@mid.individual.net>
From: Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Re: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !!
Date: 12 Aug 2020 17:44:03 GMT
Message-ID: <hpio33Fkie0U14@mid.individual.net>
References: <MPG.399afb30dee85d4b989691@nntp.aioe.org> <hphkj5Fkie0U3@mid.individual.net> <XJQYG.264806$dTb.89649@fx41.ams1> <F7RYG.69875$8b2.3773@fx07.ams1>
On Aug 12, 2020 at 5:19:49 AM MST, "David_B" <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
OK. Thanks for looking.
Please try here:-
https://www.yellowpages.com/kingsport-tn/computer-stores
121 results! Sorry there are so many to check.
Not a big deal -- just five pages. Did a search for the last four
digits... no matches.
*** end share
What do you have to say about that?
Remember, I am the one who says we should ALL accept personal
responsibility. That of course includes me. And I have no exception any
of these who troll me would ever do the same. I think that is the real
issue you folks have -- you know I will not sink to your level. Ever.
So you'll be apologizing for claiming I wrote a direct lie when I didn't then?
If and when you apologize for that, I have another one I'd like an apology for - the accusation you made about me having a copy of the floodbot either in source or compiled form. I don't want to give you the chance to confuse anyone - so we will begin with this post.
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> news:10h7v2g$hkd8$1@pothead.dont-email.me Tue, 09 Dec 2025 01:46:56 GMT in comp.os.linux.advocacy, wrote:
On 2025-12-08, Johnson <lostmyemail@quick.net> wrote:
In article <XnsB3AEDCBCD978HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>,
nobody@haph.org says...
It's what he does. He's been pulling this shit for so long, that's why >>>> these urls exist:
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
People don't take the time to create the content you can find at those >>>> urls unless you go well out of your way to earn it. All of the above urls >>>> are factual concerning him. I've never met anyone else online or in real >>>> life who is despised anywhere near the level Snit Brock McNuggets Michael >>>> Lee Glasser the Prescott computer guy is.
Thank you sir gremlin for explaining the modus operandi of
this Brock joker to me as TBH I've never in all my years
on USENET encountered a USENET kook as severely brain
damaged as this Brock specimen.
And I've seen most everything since I have been reading
and posting to USENET since the mid-late 80's.
I'm generally a person who sides with the underdog in a
confrontation be it sports, debating or politics.
I spotted this Brock person in another group and found his
posts quite intriguing, mostly because he appeared to be
quite diligent in posting proof to validate his claims
whereas others were not doing the same.
So for lack of anything else to do, I began checking
Brock's posted proof against his claims and at first I
assumed the initial couple of links might have been in
error as they had nothing to do with Brock's claims.
So, it didn't take me long to realize that Brock's links
were total hokum.
And some of his claims were outright lies. When he is
challenged he calls people socks yet he never shows any
evidence to prove those claims.
I was intrigued by his claims against you so I compared
Brock's links against your links it was at that point I
began to figure out that this Brock poster is an ass-
clown. Excuse the French as my mum used to say.
Brock somehow manages to point back to his own posts as
proof of unrelated statements.
Kind of odd in my opinion.
Another trick he uses is to distort what others post.
One example I have seen multiple times is if say you or I
post "I don't understand why you act like a fool".
Brock will twist that in a reply and say something like "I
see that you don't understand. It's good that you realize
this", while leaving out the context of the original post.
My personal conclusion is that either Brock has a reading
disability or he is being dishonest. I lean towards the
latter.
Brock also seems to have a man crush, hard-on for Pothead
as well. At first I thought that Pothead was that Steve
poster who snit stalks but the writing styles are
different so I doubt that is the case.
I find it interesting that Brock keeps attacking Pothead
and accusing him of being a white supremacist while
posting his so called proof at every opportunity.
It's four or five MID's I think and I checked out each one
and they in no way show Pothead as being a white
supremacist.
Apparently snit fed a collection of statements that
Pothead may or may not have made into some AI machine and
it determined that white supremacists often say similar
statements so using an illogical conclusion Brock assumes
Pothead must also be a white supremacist.
That level of logic is extremely poor but evidently Brock
believes it despite the conclusions he reached being
faulty.
So I've rambled enough for now so I again say thanks for
the explanation of this Brock ass-clown.
I snipped much of the post to keep it short and simple.
Gremlin is a good, extremely technically gifted poster.
As you have discovered, Brock (snit) is a piece of trailer trash
who is not only dishonest but a nasty piece of shit as well.
Thank you. What you wrote is true, btw. :)
Johnson has recently adopted snits writing style and done an about face concerning his honesty after having written the post we both responded to above.
Brock (snit) picks his targets and then fires up his trolling
operation in order to attack them and create chaos within the group.
There seems to be growing consensus that Johnson is another Sigmond along with JPG. I hope that neither turns out being true, because I was fooled by them both. <G>
It's best to ignore this troll and never, ever, reply directly to him.
For extra credit search comp.sys.mac.advocacy or comp.os.linux.advocacy
for his snit nym and see what surfaces.
I won't be a spoiler but let me just hint that Brock (Snit) is
not well liked in either group.
Not well liked is an under statement. ROFL!
--Have a Merry Christmas or whatever holiday you celebrate.
:)
On Dec 12, 2025 at 6:31:16 AM MST, "chrisv" wrote <326ojkpd1vucml2r0uj0dmrpgspie950go@4ax.com>:
Nobody wrote:
some thing wrote:
There is an effort to leave behind the nonsense of the past. Can
you join those of us moving forward in peace?
Consider offering a sincere apology to the individuals you have
previously criticized or misrepresented, clearly acknowledging that
these actions were made in error and taking full responsibility for
them.
While I cannot speak on behalf of those affected, it seems
reasonable to believe that such an approach may encourage others to
move on and may be an important step toward restoring your
reputation and moving forward.
It's your move Brock.
Man, that thing will never admit to its lies, which have been quoted
and documented literally *thousands* of times, over the years.
But yet they somehow cannot be quoted. That makes no sense.
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in news:693c1da9$1$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On Dec 12, 2025 at 6:31:16 AM MST, "chrisv" wrote
<326ojkpd1vucml2r0uj0dmrpgspie950go@4ax.com>:
Nobody wrote:
some thing wrote:
There is an effort to leave behind the nonsense of the past. Can
you join those of us moving forward in peace?
Consider offering a sincere apology to the individuals you have
previously criticized or misrepresented, clearly acknowledging that
these actions were made in error and taking full responsibility for
them.
While I cannot speak on behalf of those affected, it seems
reasonable to believe that such an approach may encourage others to
move on and may be an important step toward restoring your
reputation and moving forward.
It's your move Brock.
Man, that thing will never admit to its lies, which have been quoted
and documented literally *thousands* of times, over the years.
But yet they somehow cannot be quoted. That makes no sense.
They have been quoted hundreds, if not thousands of times already
Michael.
Just quote what you think is a lie... and has not been rehashed MANY
times.
Nobody wrote:
some thing wrote:
There is an effort to leave behind the nonsense of the past. Can you join >>> those of us moving forward in peace?
Consider offering a sincere apology to the individuals you have
previously criticized or misrepresented, clearly acknowledging that
these actions were made in error and taking full responsibility for
them.
While I cannot speak on behalf of those affected, it seems reasonable
to believe that such an approach may encourage others to move on and
may be an important step toward restoring your reputation and moving >>forward.
It's your move Brock.
Man, that thing will never admit to its lies, which have been quoted
and documented literally *thousands* of times, over the years.
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> >news:693c2325$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com Fri, 12 Dec 2025 14:13:57
GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
Just quote what you think is a lie... and has not been rehashed MANY
times.
I already shared what I know for a fact are lies. It's not a matter of
what I think personally and doing so again is pointless. You mislead the >other poster with your response. Honesty just isn't your thing.
The fact is - as I've shown - you knowingly lied with both sentences. You >'attacked' me with a false accusation and you defended brooks when no
effort to defend was necessary or applicable in this case. Two lines,
two lies.
You asked for MIDs showing that you lied and you'd apologize. I knew you
were lying when you wrote that. You're trolling for attention and any
kind of attention is good enough in your eyes. Two lines written by you - >both confirmed to be lies. It's what you do. You've been doing it for >decades.
I don't respond to you for your benefit in so much as I respond to
enlighten anyone who doesn't already know about you. Which is a small
number of people. It's only going to get smaller.
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> news:693c2325$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com Fri, 12 Dec 2025 14:13:57
GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
Just quote what you think is a lie... and has not been rehashed MANY
times.
Snit has no interest in
moving forward in peace
| Sysop: | DaiTengu |
|---|---|
| Location: | Appleton, WI |
| Users: | 1,089 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 155:08:42 |
| Calls: | 13,921 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 187,021 |
| D/L today: |
3,912 files (989M bytes) |
| Messages: | 2,457,198 |