Australia has put in place a law to ban accessto social media for > under-16s,And it remains to be seen how enforceable that is.
and New Zealand is looking to follow suit. Here is anCorse it is
interview, by Samantha Hayes of Stuff, of the “Premier” (as the
Aussies insist on calling the state Chief Ministers in their
Federation -- don’t they know that “Premier” is shortened journalese for “Prime Minister”?) of South Australia, Peter Malinauskas, the instigator of the Aussie law <https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/360690772/one-thing-architect-australias-social-media-ban-under-16s-would-do-differently>.
One of our local pro-right-wing-wannabe parties insists the law would
be “unworkable”.
Yes, Malinauskas admits that bans on underageThat last remains to be seen
smoking, drinking and now social media are never 100% effective. But
they greatly reduce the incidence of the activity, and that is what
leads to harm reduction.
Certainly, relying on the social media companies to police themselvesJust as true of the ban
is never going to work.
Because if it had worked, we would have seenThe ban is even more useless
the results, after more than 20 years of their activities. The fact
that things are, if anything, worse now than when they started, shows
the uselessness of trusting them.
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote
Australia has put in place a law to ban accessto social media for
under-16s,
And it remains to be seen how enforceable that is.
No chance in reality
and New Zealand is looking to follow suit. Here is an
interview, by Samantha Hayes of Stuff, of the Premier (as the
Aussies insist on calling the state Chief Ministers in their
Federation -- dont they know that Premier is shortened journalese
for Prime Minister?) of South Australia, Peter Malinauskas, the
instigator of the Aussie law
<https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/360690772/one-thing-architect-australias-social-media-ban-under-16s-would-do-differently>.
One of our local pro-right-wing-wannabe parties insists the law would
be unworkable.
Corse it is
Yes, Malinauskas admits that bans on underage
smoking, drinking and now social media are never 100% effective. But
they greatly reduce the incidence of the activity, and that is what
leads to harm reduction.
That last remains to be seen
Certainly, relying on the social media companies to police themselves
is never going to work.
Just as true of the ban
Because if it had worked, we would have seen
the results, after more than 20 years of their activities. The fact
that things are, if anything, worse now than when they started, shows
the uselessness of trusting them.
The ban is even more useless
On Thu, 15 May 2025 17:36:53 +1000, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wroteYears ago one had to have a card for adult sites, it failed These
Australia has put in place a law to ban accessto social media for
under-16s,
And it remains to be seen how enforceable that is.
No chance in reality
and New Zealand is looking to follow suit. Here is an interview, by
Samantha Hayes of Stuff, of the “Premier” (as the Aussies insist on
calling the state Chief Ministers in their Federation -- don’t they
know that “Premier” is shortened journalese for “Prime Minister”?) >>> of South Australia, Peter Malinauskas, the instigator of the Aussie
law
<https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/360690772/one-thing-architect-australias-social-media-ban-under-16s-would-do-differently>.
One of our local pro-right-wing-wannabe parties insists the law
would be “unworkable”.
Corse it is
Yes, Malinauskas admits that bans on underage smoking, drinking and
now social media are never 100% effective. But they greatly reduce
the incidence of the activity, and that is what leads to harm
reduction.
That last remains to be seen
Certainly, relying on the social media companies to police
themselves is never going to work.
Just as true of the ban
Because if it had worked, we would have seen the results, after more
than 20 years of their activities. The fact that things are, if
anything, worse now than when they started, shows the uselessness of
trusting them.
The ban is even more useless
snout and trotters in trough just rehashing what failed in past
On Thu, 15 May 2025 17:36:53 +1000, "Rod Speed"Fantasy
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wroteYears ago one had to have a card for adult sites,
Australia has put in place a law to ban accessto social media for
under-16s,
And it remains to be seen how enforceable that is.
No chance in reality
and New Zealand is looking to follow suit. Here is an
interview, by Samantha Hayes of Stuff, of the “Premier” (as the
Aussies insist on calling the state Chief Ministers in their
Federation -- don’t they know that “Premier” is shortened journalese >>> for “Prime Minister”?) of South Australia, Peter Malinauskas, the
instigator of the Aussie law
<https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/360690772/one-thing-architect-australias-social-media-ban-under-16s-would-do-differently>.
One of our local pro-right-wing-wannabe parties insists the law would
be “unworkable”.
Corse it is
Yes, Malinauskas admits that bans on underage
smoking, drinking and now social media are never 100% effective. But>>> they greatly reduce the incidence of the activity, and that is what
leads to harm reduction.
That last remains to be seen
Certainly, relying on the social media companies to police themselves
is never going to work.
Just as true of the ban
Because if it had worked, we would have seen
the results, after more than 20 years of their activities. The fact
that things are, if anything, worse now than when they started, shows
the uselessness of trusting them.
The ban is even more useless
it failedNo one is proposing a card and what they are proposing
These snout and trotters in trough just rehashing what failed in past
On Thu, 15 May 2025 19:44:10 +1000, Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 15 May 2025 17:36:53 +1000, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote
Australia has put in place a law to ban accessto social media for
under-16s,
And it remains to be seen how enforceable that is.
No chance in reality
and New Zealand is looking to follow suit. Here is an
interview, by Samantha Hayes of Stuff, of the Premier (as the
Aussies insist on calling the state Chief Ministers in their
Federation -- dont they know that Premier is shortened journalese
for Prime Minister?) of South Australia, Peter Malinauskas, the
instigator of the Aussie law
<https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/360690772/one-thing-architect-australias-social-media-ban-under-16s-would-do-differently>.
One of our local pro-right-wing-wannabe parties insists the law would
be unworkable.
Corse it is
Yes, Malinauskas admits that bans on underage
smoking, drinking and now social media are never 100% effective. But
they greatly reduce the incidence of the activity, and that is what
leads to harm reduction.
That last remains to be seen
Certainly, relying on the social media companies to police themselves
is never going to work.
Just as true of the ban
Because if it had worked, we would have seen
the results, after more than 20 years of their activities. The fact
that things are, if anything, worse now than when they started, shows
the uselessness of trusting them.
The ban is even more useless
Years ago one had to have a card for adult sites,
Fantasy
it failed
These snout and trotters in trough just rehashing what failed in past
No one is proposing a card and what they are proposing
is the whole of social media, not just adult sites.
And its never going to work given that any kid can just use--
someone else's account
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> writes:
On Thu, 15 May 2025 17:36:53 +1000, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wroteYears ago one had to have a card for adult sites, it failed These
Australia has put in place a law to ban accessto social media for
under-16s,
And it remains to be seen how enforceable that is.
No chance in reality
and New Zealand is looking to follow suit. Here is an interview, by
Samantha Hayes of Stuff, of the Premier (as the Aussies insist on
calling the state Chief Ministers in their Federation -- dont they
know that Premier is shortened journalese for Prime Minister?)
of South Australia, Peter Malinauskas, the instigator of the Aussie
law
<https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/360690772/one-thing-architect-australias-social-media-ban-under-16s-would-do-differently>.
One of our local pro-right-wing-wannabe parties insists the law
would be unworkable.
Corse it is
Yes, Malinauskas admits that bans on underage smoking, drinking and
now social media are never 100% effective. But they greatly reduce
the incidence of the activity, and that is what leads to harm
reduction.
That last remains to be seen
Certainly, relying on the social media companies to police
themselves is never going to work.
Just as true of the ban
Because if it had worked, we would have seen the results, after more
than 20 years of their activities. The fact that things are, if
anything, worse now than when they started, shows the uselessness of
trusting them.
The ban is even more useless
snout and trotters in trough just rehashing what failed in past
It is more likely to be about pointing the finger of blame than
achieving anything. Once there is a law requiring social media companies
to ban, the government can say it is their fault for not doing it.
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wroteUseless. We need an actual cite of sites requiring that and you don't have that
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wroteAI Overview
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wroteFantasy
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wroteYears ago one had to have a card for adult sites,
Australia has put in place a law to ban accessto social media forAnd it remains to be seen how enforceable that is.
under-16s,
No chance in reality
and New Zealand is looking to follow suit. Here is anCorse it is
interview, by Samantha Hayes of Stuff, of the “Premier” (as the
Aussies insist on calling the state Chief Ministers in their
Federation -- don’t they know that “Premier” is shortened journalese
for “Prime Minister”?) of South Australia, Peter Malinauskas, the >>>>> instigator of the Aussie law
<https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/360690772/one-thing-architect-australias-social-media-ban-under-16s-would-do-differently>.
One of our local pro-right-wing-wannabe parties insists the law would >>>>> be “unworkable”.
Yes, Malinauskas admits that bans on underageThat last remains to be seen
smoking, drinking and now social media are never 100% effective. But >>>>> they greatly reduce the incidence of the activity, and that is what
leads to harm reduction.
Certainly, relying on the social media companies to police themselves >>>>> is never going to work.Just as true of the ban
Because if it had worked, we would have seenThe ban is even more useless
the results, after more than 20 years of their activities. The fact
that things are, if anything, worse now than when they started, shows >>>>> the uselessness of trusting them.
In the past, some internet adult sites did require users to have aJust how could that physical card be inspected by the
physical card, like a credit card or a specific "adult ID card," to
access their content.
These methods were used to verify that the user was of legal age.Not even possible, see above
However, this practice has largely been replaced byAgain, no way to prove that it was that individual's card
other methods of age verification, such as credit card
or financial verification, or the use of government-issued IDs.Again, no way to prove that it was that individual's
We arent discussing australian social mediaFantasy Australia does not have any socail media sites AFAIKit failedNo one is proposing a card and what they are proposing
These snout and trotters in trough just rehashing what failed in past
is the whole of social media, not just adult sites.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2And its never going to work given that any kid can just use
someone else's account
I'm for removing Federal Parliament and just having the States form a
State appointed"unity" judiciary
Canberra is in a bubble out of touch with the states
Telecom to Telstra should of been removed as a Federal agency, and
have it in each state.
The way it is now if you live in Melbourne your mobile connections
work well in Sydney can't get a mobile connection from them and had to
go to Optus both towers are on the same Water board. water tank yet
unclear and dodgy, my Neighbour next door, his company gave him a
Telstra phone, the best, yet to talk even when raining I see him in
the back yard trying to get a clear signal!
The CEO of Testra is always in Melbourne where the team blow smoke up
her arse, so she believes a of Australia has no problems.
Yes the country seems well served, but not outside of north shore
Sydney!
It is more likely to be about pointing the finger of blame than
achieving anything. Once there is a law requiring social media companies
to ban, the government can say it is their fault for not doing it.
One of our local pro-right-wing-wannabe parties insists the law would
be "unworkable". Yes, Malinauskas admits that bans on underage
smoking, drinking and now social media are never 100% effective. But
they greatly reduce the incidence of the activity, and that is what
leads to harm reduction.
Certainly, relying on the social media companies to police themselves
is never going to work. Because if it had worked, we would have seen
the results, after more than 20 years of their activities. The fact
that things are, if anything, worse now than when they started, shows
the uselessness of trusting them.
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote
One of our local pro-right-wing-wannabe parties insists the law would
be "unworkable". Yes, Malinauskas admits that bans on underage
smoking, drinking and now social media are never 100% effective. But
they greatly reduce the incidence of the activity, and that is what
leads to harm reduction.
Rubbish, it'll be easy for kids to fake the ID requirement. That
idiotic law effectively just enforced a compulsory course on
identity fraud for under 16s. While of coure ensuring the
government can track every honest adult social media user who does
verify using their real ID.
Even if it did work it'd only push kids to using other social media
sites that don't obey the government anyway.
Certainly, relying on the social media companies to police themselves
is never going to work. Because if it had worked, we would have seen
the results, after more than 20 years of their activities. The fact
that things are, if anything, worse now than when they started, shows
the uselessness of trusting them.
The government will only be more inept at it. but really this is
about them tracking people rather than solving a problem anyway.
Rubbish, it'll be easy for kids to fake the ID requirement. That
idiotic law effectively just enforced a compulsory course on
identity fraud for under 16s. While of coure ensuring the
government can track every honest adult social media user who does
verify using their real ID.
That idiotic law effectively just enforced a compulsory course on
identity fraud for under 16s.
The government will only be more inept at it.
On 16 May 2025 09:20:54 +1000, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
That idiotic law effectively just enforced a compulsory course on
identity fraud for under 16s.
You mean, more than they do so already?
The government will only be more inept at it.
Who would do a better job? Certainly not the companies themselves. So who?
On Thu, 15 May 2025 13:15:06 +0100, Richmond wrote:
It is more likely to be about pointing the finger of blame thanIt *is* their fault. Remember, they’ve had over 20 years to clean up their act.
achieving anything. Once there is a law requiring social media companies
to ban, the government can say it is their fault for not doing it.
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
It *is* their fault. Remember, they’ve had over 20 years to clean up
their act.
yes, but they don't care. all they car about is making money and mining
data
MightyMouse wroteNot possible
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrotePrecisely. How do we make them care?
It *is* their fault. Remember, they’ve had over 20 years to clean upyes, but they don't care. all they car about is making money and mining
their act.
data
The only force they understand is legal force.Just not possible for that to work in this situation
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote
MightyMouse wrote
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote
It *is* their fault. Remember, they’ve had over 20 years to clean up >>>> their act.
yes, but they don't care. all they car about is making money and
mining data
Precisely. How do we make them care?
Not possible
The only force they understand is legal force.
Just not possible for that to work in this situation
On Fri, 16 May 2025 14:14:24 +1000, MightyMouse wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
It *is* their fault. Remember, they?ve had over 20 years to clean up
their act.
yes, but they don't care. all they car about is making money and mining data
Precisely. How do we make them care? The only force they understand is
legal force.
Australia has put in place a law to ban access to social media for
under-16s, and New Zealand is looking to follow suit. Here is an
interview, by Samantha Hayes of Stuff, of the Premier (as the
Aussies insist on calling the state Chief Ministers in their
Federation -- dont they know that Premier is shortened journalese
for Prime Minister?) of South Australia, Peter Malinauskas, the
instigator of the Aussie law ><https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/360690772/one-thing-architect-australias-social-media-ban-under-16s-would-do-differently>.
One of our local pro-right-wing-wannabe parties insists the law would
be unworkable. Yes, Malinauskas admits that bans on underage
smoking, drinking and now social media are never 100% effective. But
they greatly reduce the incidence of the activity, and that is what
leads to harm reduction.
Certainly, relying on the social media companies to police themselves
is never going to work. Because if it had worked, we would have seen
the results, after more than 20 years of their activities. The fact
that things are, if anything, worse now than when they started, shows
the uselessness of trusting them.
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wroteNope
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wroteAlso need a definition of what constitutes "social media".
MightyMouse wroteNot possible
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrotePrecisely. How do we make them care?
It *is* their fault. Remember, they’ve had over 20 years to clean up >>>>> their act.yes, but they don't care. all they car about is making money and
mining data
The only force they understand is legal force.Just not possible for that to work in this situation
Does email count?Nope, and neither does SMS
How about Usenet?No point in even considering that given that kids don't use it
On Thu, 15 May 2025 07:22:18 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro ><ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:Indeed so.
Australia has put in place a law to ban access to social media for >>under-16s, and New Zealand is looking to follow suit. Here is an
interview, by Samantha Hayes of Stuff, of the Premier (as the
Aussies insist on calling the state Chief Ministers in their
Federation -- dont they know that Premier is shortened journalese
for Prime Minister?) of South Australia, Peter Malinauskas, the >>instigator of the Aussie law >><https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/360690772/one-thing-architect-australias-social-media-ban-under-16s-would-do-differently>.
One of our local pro-right-wing-wannabe parties insists the law would
be unworkable. Yes, Malinauskas admits that bans on underage
smoking, drinking and now social media are never 100% effective. But
they greatly reduce the incidence of the activity, and that is what
leads to harm reduction.
Certainly, relying on the social media companies to police themselves
is never going to work. Because if it had worked, we would have seen
the results, after more than 20 years of their activities. The fact
that things are, if anything, worse now than when they started, shows
the uselessness of trusting them.
Banning under 16s from social media will be impossible unless some
sort of digital ID is issued to everyone and which would be required
for internet access. This legislation is insidious and must be opposed
at every opportunity.
It is up to parents to supervise their children's online activity, not >politicians.
Bill.
On Thu, 15 May 2025 07:22:18 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
Australia has put in place a law to ban access to social media forBanning under 16s from social media will be impossible unless some
under-16s, and New Zealand is looking to follow suit. Here is an
interview, by Samantha Hayes of Stuff, of the “Premier” (as the
Aussies insist on calling the state Chief Ministers in their
Federation -- don’t they know that “Premier” is shortened journalese >> for “Prime Minister”?) of South Australia, Peter Malinauskas, the
instigator of the Aussie law
<https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/360690772/one-thing-architect-australias-social-media-ban-under-16s-would-do-differently>.
One of our local pro-right-wing-wannabe parties insists the law would
be “unworkable”. Yes, Malinauskas admits that bans on underage
smoking, drinking and now social media are never 100% effective. But
they greatly reduce the incidence of the activity, and that is what
leads to harm reduction.
Certainly, relying on the social media companies to police themselves
is never going to work. Because if it had worked, we would have seen
the results, after more than 20 years of their activities. The fact
that things are, if anything, worse now than when they started, shows
the uselessness of trusting them.
sort of digital ID is issued to everyone and which would be required
for internet access.
This legislation is insidious and must be opposed
at every opportunity.
It is up to parents to supervise their children's online activity, not politicians.
Bill.
BR wrote:Fantasy
On Thu, 15 May 2025 07:22:18 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiroand so we march ever onward towards microchip implants
<ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
Australia has put in place a law to ban access to social media forBanning under 16s from social media will be impossible unless some
under-16s, and New Zealand is looking to follow suit. Here is an
interview, by Samantha Hayes of Stuff, of the “Premier” (as the
Aussies insist on calling the state Chief Ministers in their
Federation -- don’t they know that “Premier” is shortened journalese >>> for “Prime Minister”?) of South Australia, Peter Malinauskas, the
instigator of the Aussie law
<https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/360690772/one-thing-architect-australias-social-media-ban-under-16s-would-do-differently>.
One of our local pro-right-wing-wannabe parties insists the law would
be “unworkable”. Yes, Malinauskas admits that bans on underage
smoking, drinking and now social media are never 100% effective. But>>> they greatly reduce the incidence of the activity, and that is what
leads to harm reduction.
Certainly, relying on the social media companies to police themselves
is never going to work. Because if it had worked, we would have seen>>> the results, after more than 20 years of their activities. The fact
that things are, if anything, worse now than when they started, shows
the uselessness of trusting them.
sort of digital ID is issued to everyone and which would be required
for internet access.
This legislation is insidious and must be opposed
at every opportunity.
It is up to parents to supervise their children's online activity, not
politicians.
Bill.
On Sat, 17 May 2025 12:39:36 +1000, MightyMouse > <squeak!@cheesefactory.com> wrote:And there would soon be buyable microchips any kid can
BR wrote:
On Thu, 15 May 2025 07:22:18 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
<ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
Australia has put in place a law to ban access to social media forBanning under 16s from social media will be impossible unless some
under-16s, and New Zealand is looking to follow suit. Here is an
interview, by Samantha Hayes of Stuff, of the “Premier” (as the
Aussies insist on calling the state Chief Ministers in their
Federation -- don’t they know that “Premier” is shortened journalese >>>> for “Prime Minister”?) of South Australia, Peter Malinauskas, the
instigator of the Aussie law
<https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/360690772/one-thing-architect-australias-social-media-ban-under-16s-would-do-differently>.
One of our local pro-right-wing-wannabe parties insists the law would
be “unworkable”. Yes, Malinauskas admits that bans on underage
smoking, drinking and now social media are never 100% effective. But
they greatly reduce the incidence of the activity, and that is what>>>> leads to harm reduction.
Certainly, relying on the social media companies to police themselves
is never going to work. Because if it had worked, we would have seen
the results, after more than 20 years of their activities. The fact>>>> that things are, if anything, worse now than when they started, shows
the uselessness of trusting them.
sort of digital ID is issued to everyone and which would be required>>> for internet access.
and so we march ever onward towards microchip implants
Fantasy
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2This legislation is insidious and must be opposed
at every opportunity.
It is up to parents to supervise their children's online activity, not
politicians.
Bill.
BR wrote:
On Thu, 15 May 2025 07:22:18 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
<ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
Australia has put in place a law to ban access to social media forBanning under 16s from social media will be impossible unless some
under-16s, and New Zealand is looking to follow suit. Here is an
interview, by Samantha Hayes of Stuff, of the Premier (as the
Aussies insist on calling the state Chief Ministers in their
Federation -- dont they know that Premier is shortened journalese
for Prime Minister?) of South Australia, Peter Malinauskas, the
instigator of the Aussie law
<https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/360690772/one-thing-architect-australias-social-media-ban-under-16s-would-do-differently>.
One of our local pro-right-wing-wannabe parties insists the law would
be unworkable. Yes, Malinauskas admits that bans on underage
smoking, drinking and now social media are never 100% effective. But
they greatly reduce the incidence of the activity, and that is what
leads to harm reduction.
Certainly, relying on the social media companies to police themselves
is never going to work. Because if it had worked, we would have seen
the results, after more than 20 years of their activities. The fact
that things are, if anything, worse now than when they started, shows
the uselessness of trusting them.
sort of digital ID is issued to everyone and which would be required
for internet access.
and so we march ever onward towards microchip implants
--This legislation is insidious and must be opposed
at every opportunity.
It is up to parents to supervise their children's online activity, not
politicians.
Bill.
On Sat, 17 May 2025 12:39:36 +1000, MightyMouse
<squeak!@cheesefactory.com> wrote:
BR wrote:
On Thu, 15 May 2025 07:22:18 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
<ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
Australia has put in place a law to ban access to social media forBanning under 16s from social media will be impossible unless some
under-16s, and New Zealand is looking to follow suit. Here is an
interview, by Samantha Hayes of Stuff, of the Premier (as the
Aussies insist on calling the state Chief Ministers in their
Federation -- dont they know that Premier is shortened journalese
for Prime Minister?) of South Australia, Peter Malinauskas, the
instigator of the Aussie law
<https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/360690772/one-thing-architect-australias-social-media-ban-under-16s-would-do-differently>.
One of our local pro-right-wing-wannabe parties insists the law would
be unworkable. Yes, Malinauskas admits that bans on underage
smoking, drinking and now social media are never 100% effective. But
they greatly reduce the incidence of the activity, and that is what
leads to harm reduction.
Certainly, relying on the social media companies to police themselves
is never going to work. Because if it had worked, we would have seen
the results, after more than 20 years of their activities. The fact
that things are, if anything, worse now than when they started, shows
the uselessness of trusting them.
sort of digital ID is issued to everyone and which would be required
for internet access.
and so we march ever onward towards microchip implants
Fantasy
--This legislation is insidious and must be opposed
at every opportunity.
It is up to parents to supervise their children's online activity, not
politicians.
Bill.
Kids under 21 should not be allowed smart phones, only be allowed dumb
phones for text and voice.
eg Nokia 2780 <https://www.amazon.com.au/Nokia-Unlocked-Universally-Compatible-Carriers/dp/B0D3RWZ39S>
https://tinyurl.com/y8rfvh9t
Also get to recognize spare the rod and spoil the child lessons to
parents how to flog them.
To many children have little respect nowadays, My town the local cop
would kick you on the bum, then tell your parents who also gave you a hammering then you would be mowing lawns at some oldies house for 12
months
make parents accountable for their louts actions $$$
<https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-03-19/police-to-target-ringleaders-in-youth-crime-crackdown/105070820>--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
https://tinyurl.com/mu3fp8za
NSW Police to target 100 ringleaders in crackdown on youth crime
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
MightyMouse <squeak!@cheesefactory.com> wrote:
and so we march ever onward towards microchip implants
Fantasy
Saves carrying a Opal card for public transport
<https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-06-28/sydney-bio-hacker-has-opal-travel-card-implanted-into-hand/8656174>
https://tinyurl.com/4mvprzuj
Sydney man has Opal card implanted into hand to make catching public transport easier
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
MightyMouse <squeak!@cheesefactory.com> wrote:
and so we march ever onward towards microchip implants
Fantasy
Saves carrying a Opal card for public transport
Makes a lot more sense to use your smartphone so you can
track your public transport and see how close it is etc
<https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-06-28/sydney-bio-hacker-has-opal-travel-card-implanted-into-hand/8656174>
https://tinyurl.com/4mvprzuj
Sydney man has Opal card implanted into hand to make catching public
transport easier
More fool him
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Kids under 21 should not be allowed smart phones, only be allowed dumb
phones for text and voice.
Mindlessly silly and completely unengforceable because
they would just get someone over 21 to get it for them.
eg Nokia 2780
<https://www.amazon.com.au/Nokia-Unlocked-Universally-Compatible-Carriers/dp/B0D3RWZ39S>
https://tinyurl.com/y8rfvh9t
Also get to recognize spare the rod and spoil the child lessons to
parents how to flog them.
To many children have little respect nowadays, My town the local cop
would kick you on the bum, then tell your parents who also gave you a
hammering then you would be mowing lawns at some oldies house for 12
months
Never happened to me
make parents accountable for their louts actions $$$
Not even possible with the worst of the dregs of the parents
--<https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-03-19/police-to-target-ringleaders-in-youth-crime-crackdown/105070820>
https://tinyurl.com/mu3fp8za
NSW Police to target 100 ringleaders in crackdown on youth crime
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
MightyMouse <squeak!@cheesefactory.com> wrote:
and so we march ever onward towards microchip implants
Fantasy
Saves carrying a Opal card for public transport
Makes a lot more sense to use your smartphone so you can
track your public transport and see how close it is etc
I get a statement as old age pensioner it is cheap
Also can login to see where I've been and cost
For me to go to shopping mall it's $1.12 return the busdrops me outside
of Woolworth, Cole's, Aldi
Usually shop online Woolworth's
and top up with a bus trip
(10 minutes each way)
The timetable for bus and train is on mobile in real time,
stops outside 500 metres outside house
<https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-06-28/sydney-bio-hacker-has-opal-travel-card-implanted-into-hand/8656174>
https://tinyurl.com/4mvprzuj
Sydney man has Opal card implanted into hand to make catching public
transport easier
More fool him
Like doing your own tattoos on your eyelids
On Sat, 17 May 2025 12:39:36 +1000, MightyMouse
<squeak!@cheesefactory.com> wrote:
BR wrote:
On Thu, 15 May 2025 07:22:18 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
<ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
Australia has put in place a law to ban access to social media forBanning under 16s from social media will be impossible unless some
under-16s, and New Zealand is looking to follow suit. Here is an
interview, by Samantha Hayes of Stuff, of the “Premier” (as the
Aussies insist on calling the state Chief Ministers in their
Federation -- don’t they know that “Premier” is shortened journalese >>>> for “Prime Minister”?) of South Australia, Peter Malinauskas, the
instigator of the Aussie law
<https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/360690772/one-thing-architect-australias-social-media-ban-under-16s-would-do-differently>.
One of our local pro-right-wing-wannabe parties insists the law would
be “unworkable”. Yes, Malinauskas admits that bans on underage
smoking, drinking and now social media are never 100% effective. But
they greatly reduce the incidence of the activity, and that is what
leads to harm reduction.
Certainly, relying on the social media companies to police themselves
is never going to work. Because if it had worked, we would have seen
the results, after more than 20 years of their activities. The fact
that things are, if anything, worse now than when they started, shows
the uselessness of trusting them.
sort of digital ID is issued to everyone and which would be required
for internet access.
and so we march ever onward towards microchip implants
Fantasy
--This legislation is insidious and must be opposed
at every opportunity.
It is up to parents to supervise their children's online activity, not
politicians.
Bill.
Rod Speed wrote:EVERYONE isnt and isnt even doing that for their pets
On Sat, 17 May 2025 12:39:36 +1000, MightyMouse >> <squeak!@cheesefactory.com> wrote:
BR wrote:
On Thu, 15 May 2025 07:22:18 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
<ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
Australia has put in place a law to ban access to social media for>>>>> under-16s, and New Zealand is looking to follow suit. Here is anBanning under 16s from social media will be impossible unless some
interview, by Samantha Hayes of Stuff, of the “Premier” (as the
Aussies insist on calling the state Chief Ministers in their
Federation -- don’t they know that “Premier” is shortened journalese
for “Prime Minister”?) of South Australia, Peter Malinauskas, the >>>>> instigator of the Aussie law
<https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/360690772/one-thing-architect-australias-social-media-ban-under-16s-would-do-differently>. >>>>> One of our local pro-right-wing-wannabe parties insists the law would
be “unworkable”. Yes, Malinauskas admits that bans on underage
smoking, drinking and now social media are never 100% effective. But >>>>> they greatly reduce the incidence of the activity, and that is what
leads to harm reduction.
Certainly, relying on the social media companies to police themselves >>>>> is never going to work. Because if it had worked, we would have seen >>>>> the results, after more than 20 years of their activities. The fact
that things are, if anything, worse now than when they started, shows >>>>> the uselessness of trusting them.
sort of digital ID is issued to everyone and which would be required
for internet access.
and so we march ever onward towards microchip implants
Fantasy
people are already doing it
This legislation is insidious and must be opposed
at every opportunity.
It is up to parents to supervise their children's online activity, not >>>> politicians.
Bill.
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Kids under 21 should not be allowed smart phones, only be allowed dumb
phones for text and voice.
Mindlessly silly
and completely unengforceable because theywould just get someone over
21 to get it for them.
Cost's money over 21 jail time
eg Nokia 2780
<https://www.amazon.com.au/Nokia-Unlocked-Universally-Compatible-Carriers/dp/B0D3RWZ39S>
https://tinyurl.com/y8rfvh9t
Also get to recognize spare the rod and spoil the child lessons to
parents how to flog them.
To many children have little respect nowadays, My town the local cop
would kick you on the bum, then tell your parents who also gave you a
hammering then you would be mowing lawns at some oldies house for 12
months
Never happened to me
That explains what's wrong with you.
make parents accountable for their louts actions $$$
Not even possible with the worst of the dregs of the parents
Labor is back to sending these arsehole "parents" back to a onnce nice housing commission area,
which was cleaned up by last Liberal Government
Seems they are now back to selling drugs. stolen property, doing home invasions
using their kids (Oliver twist Fagan types)
Greg Warren Camden Liberal mayor, blown parachuted into Campbelltown
to be Labors state NSW member of parliament "snout and trotters in
trough". Labor pay him to go to local pubs for beer and photosgoots <https://www.police.nsw.gov.au/news/news_article?sq_content_src=%2BdXJsPWh0dHBzJTNBJTJGJTJGZWJpenByZC5wb2xpY2UubnN3Lmdvdi5hdSUyRm1lZGlhJTJGMTE4NDc3Lmh0bWwmYWxsPTE%3D>
https://tinyurl.com/22usema3
About 3am on Tuesday 6 May 2025, officers from Campbelltown Police
Area Command attended a home on Copperfield Drive, Rosemeadow, after
three men allegedly threatened a 24-year-old female occupant with a
firearm during a home invasion.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2<https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-03-19/police-to-target-ringleaders-in-youth-crime-crackdown/105070820>
https://tinyurl.com/mu3fp8za
NSW Police to target 100 ringleaders in crackdown on youth crime
On Thu, 15 May 2025 07:22:18 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
Australia has put in place a law to ban access to social media for >under-16s, and New Zealand is looking to follow suit. Here is an
interview, by Samantha Hayes of Stuff, of the ?Premier? (as the
Aussies insist on calling the state Chief Ministers in their
Federation -- don?t they know that ?Premier? is shortened journalese
for ?Prime Minister??) of South Australia, Peter Malinauskas, the >instigator of the Aussie law ><https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/360690772/one-thing-architect-australias-social-media-ban-under-16s-would-do-differently>.
One of our local pro-right-wing-wannabe parties insists the law would
be ?unworkable?. Yes, Malinauskas admits that bans on underage
smoking, drinking and now social media are never 100% effective. But
they greatly reduce the incidence of the activity, and that is what
leads to harm reduction.
Certainly, relying on the social media companies to police themselves
is never going to work. Because if it had worked, we would have seen
the results, after more than 20 years of their activities. The fact
that things are, if anything, worse now than when they started, shows
the uselessness of trusting them.
Banning under 16s from social media will be impossible unless some
sort of digital ID is issued to everyone and which would be required
for internet access. This legislation is insidious and must be opposed
at every opportunity.
It is up to parents to supervise their children's online activity, not politicians.
BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:
It is up to parents to supervise their children's online activity, not
politicians.
Indeed. And the majority of parents are doing *such* a good job of it
and know *exactly* what their children are (not) doing.
Greg Warren Camden Liberal mayor, blown parachuted into Campbelltown
to be Labors state NSW member of parliament "snout and trotters in
trough". Labor pay him to go to local pubs for beer and photosgoots
<https://www.police.nsw.gov.au/news/news_article?sq_content_src=%2BdXJsPWh0dHBzJTNBJTJGJTJGZWJpenByZC5wb2xpY2UubnN3Lmdvdi5hdSUyRm1lZGlhJTJGMTE4NDc3Lmh0bWwmYWxsPTE%3D>
https://tinyurl.com/22usema3
Fantasy on Labor paying him
About 3am on Tuesday 6 May 2025, officers from Campbelltown Police
Area Command attended a home on Copperfield Drive, Rosemeadow, after
three men allegedly threatened a 24-year-old female occupant with a
firearm during a home invasion.
Corse nothing like that ever happened inder the Libs, eh ?
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Greg Warren Camden Liberal mayor, blown parachuted into Campbelltown
to be Labors state NSW member of parliament "snout and trotters in
trough". Labor pay him to go to local pubs for beer and photosgoots
<https://www.police.nsw.gov.au/news/news_article?sq_content_src=%2BdXJsPWh0dHBzJTNBJTJGJTJGZWJpenByZC5wb2xpY2UubnN3Lmdvdi5hdSUyRm1lZGlhJTJGMTE4NDc3Lmh0bWwmYWxsPTE%3D>
https://tinyurl.com/22usema3
Fantasy on Labor paying him
Not according to my Labor party comity mates
About 3am on Tuesday 6 May 2025, officers from Campbelltown Police
Area Command attended a home on Copperfield Drive, Rosemeadow, after
three men allegedly threatened a 24-year-old female occupant with a
firearm during a home invasion.
Corse nothing like that ever happened under the Libs, eh ?
In my electorate which was guaranteed Labor one till boundaries
changed
When they did no doubt the Lib's were trying to make a good impression
Their MP was a Local cop that lived in Campbelltown, they most
certainty listened to him and got rid of the 3M streets
<https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/new-beginning-means-removing-kids-from-the-violence/news-story/d40e03b25b9103e87740e03e9f0a146b>
https://tinyurl.com/ycmb4nje
New beginning means removing kids from the violence
ROSEMEADOW residents tell tales of woe about failed attempts to get
help. They talk about the streets littered with rubbish, homes with
smashed walls, and junkies.
Most Certainly when John Fahey went federal, his replacement was Pat
Farmer guaranteed Lib seat,
his inauguration speech was concerns about the new John Howard Flight
Paths, no uncertain terms was told to "Shut the fuck up" by the Lib's
Same was happing with their Labor representatives, booth parties are
not interested in looking after guaranteed seats, parachuting snout
and trotters in, they don't like locals representing them
Which is why online controls won't work, because they won't have support
of many parents...
When I was 16 I snuck into movie theatres to watch x-rated movies, which
is probably more harmful than watching them on one's phone and certainly requires far more effort.
The only solution is to actually educate kids about sex ...
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Greg Warren Camden Liberal mayor, blown parachuted into Campbelltown
to be Labors state NSW member of parliament "snout and trotters in
trough". Labor pay him to go to local pubs for beer and photosgoots
<https://www.police.nsw.gov.au/news/news_article?sq_content_src=%2BdXJsPWh0dHBzJTNBJTJGJTJGZWJpenByZC5wb2xpY2UubnN3Lmdvdi5hdSUyRm1lZGlhJTJGMTE4NDc3Lmh0bWwmYWxsPTE%3D>
https://tinyurl.com/22usema3
Fantasy on Labor paying him
Not according to my Labor party comity mates
Just because some fool claims something...
About 3am on Tuesday 6 May 2025, officers from Campbelltown Police
Area Command attended a home on Copperfield Drive, Rosemeadow, after
three men allegedly threatened a 24-year-old female occupant with a
firearm during a home invasion.
Corse nothing like that ever happened under the Libs, eh ?
In my electorate which was guaranteed Labor one till boundaries
changed
Your electorate is completely irrelevant
When they did no doubt the Lib's were trying to make a good impression
Their MP was a Local cop that lived in Campbelltown, they most
certainty listened to him and got rid of the 3M streets
Bullshit
<https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/new-beginning-means-removing-kids-from-the-violence/news-story/d40e03b25b9103e87740e03e9f0a146b>
https://tinyurl.com/ycmb4nje
Just because some fuckwit journo claims something...
New beginning means removing kids from the violence
ROSEMEADOW residents tell tales of woe about failed attempts to get
help. They talk about the streets littered with rubbish, homes with
smashed walls, and junkies.
Corse nothing like that ever happened under the Libs, eh ?
Most Certainly when John Fahey went federal, his replacement was Pat
Farmer guaranteed Lib seat,
his inauguration speech was concerns about the new John Howard Flight
Paths, no uncertain terms was told to "Shut the fuck up" by the Lib's
Bullahir
Same was happing with their Labor representatives, booth parties are
not interested in looking after guaranteed seats, parachuting snout
and trotters in, they don't like locals representing them
Corse nothing like that ever happened under the Libs, eh ?
On Sat, 17 May 2025 14:55:17 -0400 (EDT), Scott Dorsey wrote:
Which is why online controls won't work, because they won't have support
of many parents...
It is a given, is it not, that those below a certain age are not of >sufficient maturity to make certain decisions for themselves. Thats why
our species has the concept of parents and parenting at all. Only >nowadays, society has become so complex that the parents of a child
cannot, on their own, supply sufficient guidance and care to ensure the >child grows up the right way. Thats why we have schools and
schoolteachers, for one thing.
As the saying goes, it takes a village to raise a child. And as Marshall >McLuhan pointed out, that village is nowadays well and truly global.
When I was 16 I snuck into movie theatres to watch x-rated movies, which
is probably more harmful than watching them on one's phone and certainly
requires far more effort.
And therefore you did it less. Thats the difference.
The only solution is to actually educate kids about sex ...
Some right-wingers have religious objections to that though, dont they?
On Sat, 17 May 2025 22:38:44 +1000, MightyMouse
<squeak!@cheesefactory.com> wrote:
Rod Speed wrote:
On Sat, 17 May 2025 12:39:36 +1000, MightyMouse
<squeak!@cheesefactory.com> wrote:
BR wrote:
On Thu, 15 May 2025 07:22:18 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
<ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
Australia has put in place a law to ban access to social media for >>>>>> under-16s, and New Zealand is looking to follow suit. Here is anBanning under 16s from social media will be impossible unless some
interview, by Samantha Hayes of Stuff, of the “Premier” (as the >>>>>> Aussies insist on calling the state Chief Ministers in their
Federation -- don’t they know that “Premier” is shortened journalese
for “Prime Minister”?) of South Australia, Peter Malinauskas, the >>>>>> instigator of the Aussie law
<https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/360690772/one-thing-architect-australias-social-media-ban-under-16s-would-do-differently>.
One of our local pro-right-wing-wannabe parties insists the law
would
be “unworkable”. Yes, Malinauskas admits that bans on underage >>>>>> smoking, drinking and now social media are never 100% effective. But >>>>>> they greatly reduce the incidence of the activity, and that is what >>>>>> leads to harm reduction.
Certainly, relying on the social media companies to police
themselves
is never going to work. Because if it had worked, we would have seen >>>>>> the results, after more than 20 years of their activities. The fact >>>>>> that things are, if anything, worse now than when they started,
shows
the uselessness of trusting them.
sort of digital ID is issued to everyone and which would be required >>>>> for internet access.
and so we march ever onward towards microchip implants
Fantasy
people are already doing it
EVERYONE isnt
and isnt even doing that for their pets--
even tho that is a legal requirement and no govt would
ever be stupid enough to require that for internet access
and complete trivial to bypass that even if they did
This legislation is insidious and must be opposed
at every opportunity.
It is up to parents to supervise their children's online activity,
not
politicians.
Bill.
Scott Dorsey wroteThat's not true of social media and certainly isnt true of all those under 16
Which is why online controls won't work, becausethey won't have >> support of many parents...It is a given, is it not, that those below a certain age are not of sufficient maturity to make certain decisions for themselves.
That’s why our species has the concept of “parents” and “parenting” at > all.They are still parents when the kids are 40
Only nowadays, society has become so complex that the parents of a child cannot, on their own, supply sufficient guidance and care to ensure theThat's bullshit
child grows up the right way.
That’s why we have schools andThat's bullshit too. We have schools because most parents
schoolteachers, for one thing.
As the saying goes, “it takes a village to raise a child”.That's always been mindless bullshit and clearly
And as Marshall McLuhan pointed out, that“village” is nowadays well > and truly global.More mindless bullshit.
There is no evidence that any ban on the use of socialWhen I was 16 I snuck into movie theatres to watch x-rated movies, whichAnd therefore you did it less. That’s the difference.
is probably more harmful than watching them on one's phone and certainly
requires far more effort.
Who cares about fools like thatThe only solution is to actually educate kids about sex ...Some right-wingers have religious objections to that though, don’t they?
Rod Speed wroteThat is bullshit
MightyMouse <squeak!@cheesefactory.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
MightyMouse <squeak!@cheesefactory.com> wrote
BR wrote
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote
Australia has put in place a law to ban access to social media for >>>>>>> under-16s, and New Zealand is looking to follow suit. Here is an>>>>>>> interview, by Samantha Hayes of Stuff, of the “Premier” (as the
Aussies insist on calling the state Chief Ministers in their
Federation -- don’t they know that “Premier” is shortened >>>>>>> journalese for “Prime Minister”?)
More bullshitof South Australia, Peter Malinauskas, the instigator of the >>>>>>> Aussie law
<https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/360690772/one-thing-architect-australias-social-media-ban-under-16s-would-do-differently>.
That isnt illegal in this country, most obviouslyOne of our local pro-right-wing-wannabe parties insists the law >>>>>>> would be “unworkable”. Yes, Malinauskas admits that bans on >>>>>>> underage smoking,
That isnt illegal in this country, most obviouslydrinking
There is no harm involvedand now social media are never 100% effective. But
they greatly reduce the incidence of the activity, andthat is >>>>>>> what leads to harm reduction.
You clearly did use the word everyonenever said it was happening now with everyone.EVERYONE isntpeople are already doing itFantasyand so we march ever onward towards microchip implantsCertainly, relying on the social media companies to police >>>>>>> themselvesBanning under 16s from social media will be impossible unless some >>>>>> sort of digital ID is issued to everyone and which would be required >>>>>> for internet access.
is never going to work. Because if it had worked, we would have >>>>>>> seen
the results, after more than 20 years of their activities. The fact >>>>>>> that things are, if anything, worse now than when they started, >>>>>>> shows
the uselessness of trusting them.
I said it will eventually happen.And you got that wrong, most obviously with pets
we have everything on our phones now, ID, drivers licence, credit cards, > tap and go, etc.,Plenty dont
it's the next logical step to put all this into us.But few will be stupid enough to do it like that because
tap and go chip payment was even happening six years go .. > https://www.bbc.com/news/business-61008730And some choose to not use that
https://www.govtech.com/blogs/lohrmann-on-cybersecurity/from-progress-to-bans-how-close-are-human-microchip-implantsIrrelevant to whether we will ever all be required to have embedded id
and Elon Musk has taken it even a step further already .. > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lL6nej4am3c
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2and isnt even doing that for their pets
even tho that is a legal requirement and no govt would
ever be stupid enough to require that for internet access
and complete trivial to bypass that even if they did
This legislation is insidious and must be opposed
at every opportunity.
It is up to parents to supervise their children's online activity, >>>>>> not politicians.
As usual accomplish nothing and these parasites know it.
Kids under 21 should not be allowed smart phones, only be allowed dumb
phones for text and voice.
eg Nokia 2780 ><https://www.amazon.com.au/Nokia-Unlocked-Universally-Compatible-Carriers/dp/B0D3RWZ39S>
https://tinyurl.com/y8rfvh9t
Also get to recognize spare the rod and spoil the child lessons to
parents how to flog them.
To many children have little respect nowadays, My town the local cop
would kick you on the bum, then tell your parents who also gave you a >hammering then you would be mowing lawns at some oldies house for 12
months
make parents accountable for their louts actions $$$
<https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-03-19/police-to-target-ringleaders-in-youth-crime-crackdown/105070820>
https://tinyurl.com/mu3fp8za
NSW Police to target 100 ringleaders in crackdown on youth crime
As usual accomplish nothing and these parasites know it.
Kids under 21 should not be allowed smart phones, only be allowed dumb >>phones for text and voice.
eg Nokia 2780 >><https://www.amazon.com.au/Nokia-Unlocked-Universally-Compatible-Carriers/dp/B0D3RWZ39S>
https://tinyurl.com/y8rfvh9t
Also get to recognize spare the rod and spoil the child lessons to
parents how to flog them.
To many children have little respect nowadays, My town the local cop
would kick you on the bum, then tell your parents who also gave you a >>hammering then you would be mowing lawns at some oldies house for 12
months
make parents accountable for their louts actions $$$ >><https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-03-19/police-to-target-ringleaders-in-youth-crime-crackdown/105070820>
https://tinyurl.com/mu3fp8za
NSW Police to target 100 ringleaders in crackdown on youth crime
Uncontrollable youth gangs have always been a problem. The early 20th >century brought in legislation to have schooling compulsory up until
the age of 14. And reform and trade schools sequestered the worst.
Corporal punishment was routine, and read on...... >https://www.thefreelibrary.com/%22Give+him+a+doing%22%3a+the+birching+of+young+offenders+in+Scotland+(1).-a099019935
As usual accomplish nothing and these parasites know it.
Kids under 21 should not be allowed smart phones, only be allowed dumb
phones for text and voice.
eg Nokia 2780
<https://www.amazon.com.au/Nokia-Unlocked-Universally-Compatible-Carriers/dp/B0D3RWZ39S>
https://tinyurl.com/y8rfvh9t
Also get to recognize spare the rod and spoil the child lessons to
parents how to flog them.
To many children have little respect nowadays, My town the local cop
would kick you on the bum, then tell your parents who also gave you a
hammering then you would be mowing lawns at some oldies house for 12
months
make parents accountable for their louts actions $$$
<https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-03-19/police-to-target-ringleaders-in-youth-crime-crackdown/105070820>
https://tinyurl.com/mu3fp8za
NSW Police to target 100 ringleaders in crackdown on youth crime
Uncontrollable youth gangs have always been a problem.
The early 20th
century brought in legislation to have schooling compulsory up until
the age of 14.
And reform and trade schools sequestered the worst.
Corporal punishment was routine,
and read on...... https://www.thefreelibrary.com/%22Give+him+a+doing%22%3a+the+birching+of+young+offenders+in+Scotland+(1).-a099019935
On Sat, 17 May 2025 14:55:17 -0400 (EDT), Scott Dorsey wrote:
The only solution is to actually educate kids about sex ...
Some right-wingers have religious objections to that though, don't they?
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote
Scott Dorsey wrote
The only solution is to actually educate kids about sex ...
Some right-wingers have religious objections to that though, don't they?
Not just right-wingers. Plenty of folks left and center have social objections to that. (Most of the claimed religious objections on the
right turn out to be social objections when carefully inspected.)
We live in a society that is very messed-up about sex
and that isn't going to change until people see places that are less
so.
The nice thing about the internet is that it giveskids an opportunity
to see places that are less so.
The bad thing about the internet is that it provides no context.
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Sat, 17 May 2025 14:55:17 -0400 (EDT), Scott Dorsey wrote:
The only solution is to actually educate kids about sex ...
Some right-wingers have religious objections to that though, don't they?
Not just right-wingers. Plenty of folks left and center have social >objections to that. (Most of the claimed religious objections on the
right turn out to be social objections when carefully inspected.)
We live in a society that is very messed-up about sex and that isn't
going to change until people see places that are less so. The nice
thing about the internet is that it gives kids an opportunity to see
places that are less so. The bad thing about the internet is that it >provides no context.
--scott
kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) wrote
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote
Scott Dorsey wrote
The only solution is to actually educate kids about sex ...
Some right-wingers have religious objections to that though, don't
they?
Not just right-wingers. Plenty of folks left and center have social
objections to that. (Most of the claimed religious objections on the
right turn out to be social objections when carefully inspected.)
We live in a society that is very messed-up about sex and that isn't
going to change until people see places that are less so. The nice
thing about the internet is that it gives kids an opportunity to see
places that are less so. The bad thing about the internet is that it
provides no context.
There has to be some balance between freedom and control.
In the USA various venereal diseases, like clamidia andgonorrhea are
out of control, especially among blacks.
The mechanics of sex must be combined with social skills& responsibilities and should be taught from a young age.
Various religions oppose this mainly inthe endeavor to breed more adherents,
and the costs of caring for bastards and gravid mothers.
Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wroteIt is not bullshit. It's common sense.
kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) wrote
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote
Scott Dorsey wrote
The only solution is to actually educate kids about sex ...
Not even possible
Some right-wingers have religious objections to that though, don't
they?
Not just right-wingers. Plenty of folks left and center have social
objections to that. (Most of the claimed religious objections on the
right turn out to be social objections when carefully inspected.)
We live in a society that is very messed-up about sex and that isn't
going to change until people see places that are less so. The nice
thing about the internet is that it gives kids an opportunity to see
places that are less so. The bad thing about the internet is that it
provides no context.
There has to be some balance between freedom and control.
Bullshit
Look it up! It is not bullshit.In the USA various venereal diseases, like clamidia andgonorrhea are
out of control, especially among blacks.
Bullshit
Yes it is. Flog them if they refuse to learn!The mechanics of sex must be combined with social skills&
responsibilities and should be taught from a young age.
Not even possible.
It's the main one!Various religions oppose this mainly inthe endeavor to breed more
adherents,
That's not why they do that
"Child benefits" do not knock them up?and the costs of caring for bastards and gravid mothers.
In fact the stupid child benefits system actually encourages that
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote
kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) wrote
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote
Scott Dorsey wrote
The only solution is to actually educate kids about sex ...
Not even possible
Some right-wingers have religious objections to that though, don't
they?
Not just right-wingers. Plenty of folks left and center have social
objections to that. (Most of the claimed religious objections on the
right turn out to be social objections when carefully inspected.)
We live in a society that is very messed-up about sex and that isn't
going to change until people see places that are less so. The nice
thing about the internet is that it gives kids an opportunity to see
places that are less so. The bad thing about the internet is that it
provides no context.
There has to be some balance between freedom and control.
Bullshit
It is not bullshit.
It's common sense.
In the USA various venereal diseases, like clamidia and
gonorrhea are out of control, especially among blacks.
Bullshit
Look it up!
It is not bullshit.
The mechanics of sex must be combined with social skills&
responsibilities and should be taught from a young age.
Not even possible.
Yes it is. Flog them if they refuse to learn!
Various religions oppose this mainly in
the endeavor to breed more adherents,
That's not why they do that
It's the main one!
and the costs of caring for bastards and gravid mothers.
In fact the stupid child benefits system actually encourages that
"Child benefits" do not knock them up?
BTW, I have a 300-meter steel tower in Paris for sale, quite cheap,
honest!
On 17 May 2025 17:29:05 GMT
Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote:
BTW, I have a 300-meter steel tower in Paris for sale, quite cheap,Don't buy his tower! Get a proper cast iron one.
honest!
Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote
kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) wrote
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote
Scott Dorsey wrote
The only solution is to actually educate kids about sex ...
Not even possible
Some right-wingers have religious objections to that though, don't >>>>>> they?
Not just right-wingers. Plenty of folks left and center have social >>>>> objections to that. (Most of the claimed religious objections on the >>>>> right turn out to be social objections when carefully inspected.)
We live in a society that is very messed-up about sex and that isn't >>>>> going to change until people see places that are less so. The nice
thing about the internet is that it gives kids an opportunity to see >>>>> places that are less so. The bad thing about the internet is that it >>>>> provides no context.
There has to be some balance between freedom and control.
Bullshit
It is not bullshit.
Its complete and utter bullshit
It's common sense.
Control isnt even possible
In the USA various venereal diseases, like clamidia and
gonorrhea are out of control, especially among blacks.
Bullshit
Look it up!
Nothing to look up that says anything even remotely like that
The above is solid gold diamond encrusted truth. Why is everything "bullshit".?It is not bullshit.
Its complete and utter bullshit
Wot? All the best things are illegal. Look at the USA govt debt!The mechanics of sex must be combined with social skills&
responsibilities and should be taught from a young age.
Not even possible.
Yes it is. Flog them if they refuse to learn!
Even sillier than you usually manage and not even legal
Various religions oppose this mainly in
the endeavor to breed more adherents,
That's not why they do that
It's the main one!
Bullshit it is. If it was, they wouldnt be banning fucking outside marriage Yes they would given the roving stud could be of any religion.
Nevertheless the result is poor-quality bastards.and the costs of caring for bastards and gravid mothers.
In fact the stupid child benefits system actually encourages that
"Child benefits" do not knock them up?
But is the reason the dregs choose to have the brats, so they dont
have to work and just put their hand out to the govt instead
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote
kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) wrote
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote
Scott Dorsey wrote
The only solution is to actually educate kids about sex ...
Not even possible
Some right-wingers have religious objections to that though, don't >>>>>>> they?
Not just right-wingers. Plenty of folks left and center have social >>>>>> objections to that. (Most of the claimed religious objections on >>>>>> the right turn out to be social objections when carefully
inspected.)
We live in a society that is very messed-up about sex and that isn't >>>>>> going to change until people see places that are less so. The nice >>>>>> thing about the internet is that it gives kids an opportunity to see >>>>>> places that are less so. The bad thing about the internet is that >>>>>> it provides no context.
There has to be some balance between freedom and control.
Bullshit
It is not bullshit.
Its complete and utter bullshit
It's common sense.
Control isnt even possible
Some control is possible.
No one gets it 100% of the time
In the USA various venereal diseases, like clamidia and
gonorrhea are out of control, especially among blacks.
Bullshit
Look it up!
Nothing to look up that says anything even remotely like that
Jesus, every medical book says so,
They're screwing themselves into an early grave.
It is not bullshit.
Its complete and utter bullshit
The above is solid gold diamond encrusted truth. Why is everything "bullshit".?
The mechanics of sex must be combined with social skills&
responsibilities and should be taught from a young age.
Not even possible.
Yes it is. Flog them if they refuse to learn!
Even sillier than you usually manage and not even legal
Wot? All the best things are illegal.
Look at the USA govt debt!
Various religions oppose this mainly in
the endeavor to breed more adherents,
That's not why they do that
It's the main one!
Bullshit it is. If it was, they wouldnt be banning fucking outside
marriage
Yes they would given the roving stud could be of any religion.
and the costs of caring for bastards and gravid mothers.
In fact the stupid child benefits system actually encourages that
"Child benefits" do not knock them up?
But is the reason the dregs choose to have the brats, so they dont
have to work and just put their hand out to the govt instead
Nevertheless the result is poor-quality bastards.
"Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> writes:
On 17 May 2025 17:29:05 GMT
Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote:
BTW, I have a 300-meter steel tower in Paris for sale, quite cheap,Don't buy his tower! Get a proper cast iron one.
honest!
Oh, well! If that's your inclination, I have a nice bridge in
Shropshire that might interest you.
Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote
kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) wrote
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote
Scott Dorsey wrote
The only solution is to actually educate kids about sex ...
Not even possible
Some right-wingers have religious objections to that though, don't >>>>>>>> they?
Not just right-wingers. Plenty of folks left and center have social >>>>>>> objections to that. (Most of the claimed religious objections on >>>>>>> the right turn out to be social objections when carefully
inspected.)
We live in a society that is very messed-up about sex and that isn't >>>>>>> going to change until people see places that are less so. The nice >>>>>>> thing about the internet is that it gives kids an opportunity to see >>>>>>> places that are less so. The bad thing about the internet is that >>>>>>> it provides no context.
There has to be some balance between freedom and control.
Bullshit
It is not bullshit.
Its complete and utter bullshit
It's common sense.
Control isnt even possible
Some control is possible.
Nope and it never has been
Well, you screw me over 100% of the time!No one gets it 100% of the time
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 18:41:37 +1000, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote
kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) wrote
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote
Scott Dorsey wrote
The only solution is to actually educate kids about sex ...
Not even possible
Some right-wingers have religious objections to that though, >>>>>>>>> don't
they?
Not just right-wingers. Plenty of folks left and center have >>>>>>>> social
objections to that. (Most of the claimed religious objections on >>>>>>>> the right turn out to be social objections when carefully
inspected.)
We live in a society that is very messed-up about sex and that >>>>>>>> isn't
going to change until people see places that are less so. The >>>>>>>> nice
thing about the internet is that it gives kids an opportunity to >>>>>>>> see
places that are less so. The bad thing about the internet is that >>>>>>>> it provides no context.
There has to be some balance between freedom and control.
Bullshit
It is not bullshit.
Its complete and utter bullshit
It's common sense.
Control isnt even possible
Some control is possible.
Nope and it never has been
As with every law 100% is not possible. But they work most of the time!
Sex education of children has never worked except in the sense that it
does make clear that fucking can make you pregnant
On Fri, 06 Jun 2025 07:48:20 +1000, Rod Speed wrote:
Sex education of children has never worked except in the sense that it
does make clear that fucking can make you pregnant
Sex education with adults never works either, your parents failed, they
had you ya inbred disease
On 6 Jun 2025 16:08:28 +1000, noel <deletethis@invalid.lan> wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jun 2025 07:48:20 +1000, Rod Speed wrote:Yes, we should direct our attention to adults, especially the Hominid
Sex education of children has never worked except in the sense that itSex education with adults never works either, your parents failed, they
does make clear that fucking can make you pregnant
had you ya inbred disease
old farts who will not be tutored. After all it's the adults who have
the feral kids. I have long recommended the re-introduction of
corporal punishment to adequately correct, admonish, instruct and
improve the condition of randy sticky-fingered teen creatures.
Peter Jason wrote
noel <deletethis@invalid.lan> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Sex education of children has never worked except in the sense that it >>>> does make clear that fucking can make you pregnant
Sex education with adults never works either, your parents failed, they
had you ya inbred disease
Yes, we should direct our attention to adults, especially the Hominid
old farts who will not be tutored. After all it's the adults who have
the feral kids. I have long recommended the re-introduction of
corporal punishment to adequately correct, admonish, instruct and
improve the condition of randy sticky-fingered teen creatures.
the lack of discipline at all levels in society is why we have so many social problems today.
problems that other countries, notably Asian,don't have
because they punish people for bad behaviour and breaching societal dictates.
MightyMouse <squeak!@cheesefactory.com> wrote
Peter Jason wrote
noel <deletethis@invalid.lan> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Sex education of children has never worked except in the sense
that it
does make clear that fucking can make you pregnant
Sex education with adults never works either, your parents failed,
they
had you ya inbred disease
Yes, we should direct our attention to adults, especially the Hominid
old farts who will not be tutored. After all it's the adults who have
the feral kids. I have long recommended the re-introduction of
corporal punishment to adequately correct, admonish, instruct and
improve the condition of randy sticky-fingered teen creatures.
the lack of discipline at all levels in society is why we have so
many social problems today.
Bullshit
problems that other countries, notably Asian,don't have
More bullshit
because they punish people for bad behaviour and breaching societal
dictates.
More bullshit
Rod Speed wrote
MightyMouse <squeak!@cheesefactory.com> wrote
Peter Jason wrote
noel <deletethis@invalid.lan> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Sex education of children has never worked except in the sense that >>>>>> it
does make clear that fucking can make you pregnant
Sex education with adults never works either, your parents failed, >>>>> they
had you ya inbred disease
Yes, we should direct our attention to adults, especially the Hominid
old farts who will not be tutored. After all it's the adults who have >>>> the feral kids. I have long recommended the re-introduction of
corporal punishment to adequately correct, admonish, instruct and
improve the condition of randy sticky-fingered teen creatures.
the lack of discipline at all levels in society is why we have so many >>> social problems today.
Bullshit
problems that other countries, notably Asian,don't have
More bullshit
because they punish people for bad behaviour and breaching societal
dictates.
More bullshit
go to Singapore and start tagging buildings and see what happens to you
problems that other countries, notably Asian,don't have
More bullshit
because they punish people for bad behaviour and breaching societal
dictates.
More bullshit
go to Singapore and start tagging buildings and see what happens to you
MightyMouse <"squeak!"@cheesefactory.com> wroteHave fun explaining the graffiti in Hong Kong
problems that other countries, notably Asian,don't haveMore bullshit
I find with Asians they don't see the point of mindless Graffiti,go to Singapore and start tagging buildings and see what happens to youbecause they punish people for bad behaviour and breaching societalMore bullshit
dictates.
there is no money in it!
Robbery, selling drugs, prostitution yes. But dealt with harshlyTrivial to use a fake ID
corruption is endemic
**************
France now requires Adult site access to upload a photo ID to access
adult websites, instead of just clicking on a button that says they’re > 18.
<https://nypost.com/2025/06/07/world-news/au-revoir-pornhub-adult-site-pulls-out-of-france-users-rage/>--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
https://tinyurl.com/s97nbc6t
Au revoir Pornhub! Adult site pulls out of France, sending users into
a frenzy
For the love of godThere is no god
please drop comp.misc from this stupid pissing match of a conversation.Get fucked
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
MightyMouse <"squeak!"@cheesefactory.com> wrote
problems that other countries, notably Asian,don't have
More bullshit
because they punish people for bad behaviour and breaching >> societal
dictates.
More bullshit
go to Singapore and start tagging buildings and see what happens to >> you
I find with Asians they don't see the point of mindless Graffiti,
there is no money in it!
Have fun explaining the graffiti in Hong Kong
Robbery, selling drugs, prostitution yes. But dealt with harshly
corruption is endemic
**************
France now requires Adult site access to upload a photo ID to access
adult websites, instead of just clicking on a button that says they’re >> > 18.
Trivial to use a fake ID
https://tinyurl.com/s97nbc6t<https://nypost.com/2025/06/07/world-news/au-revoir-pornhub-adult-site-pulls-out-of-france-users-rage/>
Au revoir Pornhub! Adult site pulls out of France, sending users into
a frenzy
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Retrograde <fungus@amongus.com.invalid> wrote
For the love of god
There is no god
Not what George Washington believed
George Washington
"The thing that sets the American Christian apart is that he will die
on his feet before he will live on his knees."
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2please drop comp.misc from this stupid pissing match of a
conversation.
Get fucked
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wroteI suspect that none of the Newsgroups it is being sent to are relevant
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Retrograde <fungus@amongus.com.invalid> wrote
For the love of god
There is no god
Not what George Washington believed
Its no news that there are plenty as stupid as you and him
George Washington
"The thing that sets the American Christian apart is that he will die
on his feet before he will live on his knees."
And that fucker grovelled to some sky fairy on his knees
please drop comp.misc from this stupid pissing match of a
conversation.
Get fucked
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Retrograde <fungus@amongus.com.invalid> wrote
For the love of god
There is no god
Not what George Washington believed
Its no news that there are plenty as stupid as you and him
George Washington
"The thing that sets the American Christian apart is that he will die
on his feet before he will live on his knees."
And that fucker grovelled to some sky fairy on his knees
please drop comp.misc from this stupid pissing match of a
conversation.
Get fucked
I suspect that none of the Newsgroups it is being sent to are relevant
please drop comp.misc from this stupid pissing match of a
conversation.
I suspect that none of the Newsgroups it is being sent to are relevantGet fucked
On Sun, 08 Jun 2025 17:50:04 +1200
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
I suspect that none of the Newsgroups it is being sent to are relevantplease drop comp.misc from this stupid pissing match of a
conversation.
Get fucked
Well Rod Speed is clearly a special kind of aggressive shitpile to
manually re-add comp.misc to the list of newsgroups before going back
to his usual blathering stupidity.
Killfiled and problem solved.
On Sun, 08 Jun 2025 22:11:51 +1000, Retrograde
<fungus@amongus.com.invalid> wrote:
On Sun, 08 Jun 2025 17:50:04 +1200
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
I suspect that none of the Newsgroups it is being sent to are relevantplease drop comp.misc from this stupid pissing match of a
conversation.
Get fucked
Well Rod Speed is clearly a special kind of aggressive shitpile to
manually re-add comp.misc to the list of newsgroups before going back
to his usual blathering stupidity.
Killfiled and problem solved.
Nope, dope
MightyMouse <squeak!@cheesefactory.com> wrote
Peter Jason wrote
noel <deletethis@invalid.lan> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Sex education of children has never worked except in the sense that it >>>>> does make clear that fucking can make you pregnant
Sex education with adults never works either, your parents failed, they >>>> had you ya inbred disease
Yes, we should direct our attention to adults, especially the Hominid
old farts who will not be tutored. After all it's the adults who have
the feral kids. I have long recommended the re-introduction of
corporal punishment to adequately correct, admonish, instruct and
improve the condition of randy sticky-fingered teen creatures.
the lack of discipline at all levels in society is why we have so many
social problems today.
Bullshit
problems that other countries, notably Asian,don't have
More bullshit
because they punish people for bad behaviour and breaching societal
dictates.
More bullshit
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
MightyMouse <squeak!@cheesefactory.com> wrote
Peter Jason wrote
noel <deletethis@invalid.lan> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Sex education of children has never worked except in the sense that >>>>>> it does make clear that fucking can make you pregnant
Sex education with adults never works either, your parents failed, >>>>> they had you ya inbred disease
Yes, we should direct our attention to adults, especially the Hominid
old farts who will not be tutored. After all it's the adults who have >>>> the feral kids. I have long recommended the re-introduction of
corporal punishment to adequately correct, admonish, instruct and
improve the condition of randy sticky-fingered teen creatures.
the lack of discipline at all levels in society is why we have so many
social problems today.
Bullshit
problems that other countries, notably Asian,don't have
More bullshit
because they punish people for bad behaviour and breaching societal
dictates.
More bullshit
There is no bullshit.
Singapore is famous for admonishing, catching,
sequestering and sentencing those refractory brats who daub wall with
their vandalisms.
These vandals are stripped and caned.
Hence Singapore is almost graffiti free.
Curiously this has not been taken up in other countries, even though
it works, and is the cheapest form of punishment there is.
We, the long suffering taxpayer, has to fork out $quillions
to finance
cleanup operations where a good flogging would so the job for almost
nothing.
Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wroteSo? Perhaps the rest of Asia should follow!
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
MightyMouse <squeak!@cheesefactory.com> wrote
Peter Jason wrote
noel <deletethis@invalid.lan> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Sex education of children has never worked except in the sense that >>>>>>> it does make clear that fucking can make you pregnant
Sex education with adults never works either, your parents failed, >>>>>> they had you ya inbred disease
Yes, we should direct our attention to adults, especially the Hominid >>>>> old farts who will not be tutored. After all it's the adults who have >>>>> the feral kids. I have long recommended the re-introduction of
corporal punishment to adequately correct, admonish, instruct and
improve the condition of randy sticky-fingered teen creatures.
the lack of discipline at all levels in society is why we have so many >>>> social problems today.
Bullshit
problems that other countries, notably Asian,don't have
More bullshit
because they punish people for bad behaviour and breaching societal
dictates.
More bullshit
There is no bullshit.
It is nothing but bullshit
Singapore is famous for admonishing, catching,
sequestering and sentencing those refractory brats who daub wall with
their vandalisms.
Pity its a microscopic subset of asia
Picky picky, Bared then?These vandals are stripped and caned.
Bullshit on the stripped
Irrelevant!Hence Singapore is almost graffiti free.
Pity about the rest of asia which isnt
It is not bullshit at all. Clean-up crews are at it all the time!Curiously this has not been taken up in other countries, even though
it works, and is the cheapest form of punishment there is.
We, the long suffering taxpayer, has to fork out $quillions
More bullshit
Rubbish! A simple stake-out would do it.to finance
cleanup operations where a good flogging would so the job for almost
nothing.
Costs heaps to find the culprits, fuckwit
On Sun, 08 Jun 2025 17:50:04 +1200
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
I suspect that none of the Newsgroups it is being sent to are relevantplease drop comp.misc from this stupid pissing match of a
conversation.
Get fucked
Well Rod Speed is clearly a special kind of aggressive shitpile to
manually re-add comp.misc to the list of newsgroups before going back
to his usual blathering stupidity.
Killfiled and problem solved.
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
MightyMouse <squeak!@cheesefactory.com> wrote
Peter Jason wrote
noel <deletethis@invalid.lan> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Sex education of children has never worked except in the sense >>>>>>>> that it does make clear that fucking can make you pregnant
Sex education with adults never works either, your parents failed, >>>>>>> they had you ya inbred disease
Yes, we should direct our attention to adults, especially the
Hominid
old farts who will not be tutored. After all it's the adults who >>>>>> have
the feral kids. I have long recommended the re-introduction of
corporal punishment to adequately correct, admonish, instruct and
improve the condition of randy sticky-fingered teen creatures.
the lack of discipline at all levels in society is why we have so
many social problems today.
Bullshit
problems that other countries, notably Asian,don't have
More bullshit
because they punish people for bad behaviour and breaching societal >>>>> dictates.
More bullshit
There is no bullshit.
It is nothing but bullshit
Singapore is famous for admonishing, catching,
sequestering and sentencing those refractory brats who daub wall with
their vandalisms.
Pity its a microscopic subset of asia
So?
Perhaps the rest of Asia should follow!
These vandals are stripped and caned.
Bullshit on the stripped
Picky picky,
Bared then?\
Hence Singapore is almost graffiti free.
Pity about the rest of asia which isnt
Irrelevant!
Curiously this has not been taken up in other countries, even though
it works, and is the cheapest form of punishment there is.
We, the long suffering taxpayer, has to fork out $quillions
More bullshit
It is not bullshit at all.
Clean-up crews are at it all the time!
to finance
cleanup operations where a good flogging would so the job for almost
nothing.
Costs heaps to find the culprits, fuckwit
Rubbish!
A simple stake-out would do it.
Let me say I'm appalled by your negativism!
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 06:11:51 -0600, Retrograde
<fungus@amongus.com.invalid> wrote:
On Sun, 08 Jun 2025 17:50:04 +1200
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
I suspect that none of the Newsgroups it is being sent to are relevantplease drop comp.misc from this stupid pissing match of a
conversation.
Get fucked
Well Rod Speed is clearly a special kind of aggressive shitpile to
manually re-add comp.misc to the list of newsgroups before going back
to his usual blathering stupidity.
Killfiled and problem solved.
Relax; I'm still educating that Hominid.
| Sysop: | DaiTengu |
|---|---|
| Location: | Appleton, WI |
| Users: | 1,064 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 148:07:01 |
| Calls: | 13,691 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 186,936 |
| D/L today: |
33 files (6,120K bytes) |
| Messages: | 2,410,932 |