• Re: Video games Europe - Seriously?

    From Justisaur@justisaur@gmail.com to comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action on Wed Jul 16 08:32:28 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action

    On 7/10/2025 9:10 AM, candycanearter07 wrote:
    Spalls Hurgenson <spallshurgenson@gmail.com> wrote at 16:25 this Wednesday (GMT):
    On Wed, 9 Jul 2025 08:38:54 +0100, JAB <noway@nochance.com> wrote:

    On 07/07/2025 16:43, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
    I saw all this in passing, but didn't really care to dig deeper into
    the matter -Intenet drama bores me- but, in the name of keeping
    informed, I appreciate the summary.

    I don't mind a bit of it now and then and this one I found interesting
    as it seems to be a classic case of someone who's never got past that
    teenager mindset of I can never be wrong. Most people at some stage in
    their life learn that they aren't infallible and although they may not
    like being in error when it happens the best thing to do is put your
    hands up and just admit that's the case. Generally people will accept,
    even respect, that and just move on.

    It's probably worsened by having a public persona (even if it is as
    mediocre a one as being a "YouTube celebrity"). Or that you're in
    frequent communication with Fans On The Internet, who are not only
    quick to point out any conflicting views you may have had, but provide
    links to where you said something that disagrees with your current
    statements. The internet can be incredibly critical, and when you're
    income depends on maintaining the good will and your trustworthiness
    (as in, people can depend on you for certain viewpoints), backing down
    can be extremely taxing.

    Apparently the guy has a huge ego too, they're terrible at programming despite "working at Bethesda for 20 years" (because his dad is a major employee), and yet literally calls himself "coding jesus" (also he
    called out toby fox for being a bad coder), also some WoW drama where
    they abandoned their team?

    Also he is AGAINST pirating software.

    I followed him for awhile. I've never seen him say this, the only thing
    I've seen is him saying it's a price issue, if you price too high in
    different regions, there will be pirating.
    --
    -Justisaur

    ø-ø
    (\_/)\
    `-'\ `--.___,
    ¶¬'\( ,_.-'
    \\
    ^'
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Spalls Hurgenson@spallshurgenson@gmail.com to comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action on Wed Jul 16 14:24:25 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action

    On Wed, 16 Jul 2025 08:22:35 +0100, JAB <noway@nochance.com> wrote:

    Well this is more than I thought would happen. One of the vice
    presidents of the EU has come out in support of the initiative. Where
    it's goes from here is anybody's guess. Something I also noticed,
    Videogames Europe is based in Brussels, now I can't imagine why they
    choose that location. Maybe they really like Belgian fries with mayo?

    https://www.eurogamer.net/as-stop-killing-games-momentum-continues-top-eu-politician-offers-support-a-game-once-sold-belongs-to-the-customer

    To be clear, though, all Stefanuta (the politician in question) was
    did was say is (paraphrased), "yeah, this a good idea," and he signed
    the non-binding "Stop Killing Games" petition. He hasn't actually
    pushed forward any initiatives that would support it. And, coming from
    Romania, I'm not sure how much influence he'd have anyway. At this
    point, he's just one more name on the petition and (with apologies to
    our Romanian neighbors) little more important than if, say, Tom Hanks
    signed his name to the list. Buzzworthy, but not really moving us
    forward.

    I'll happily eat my hat, though, if tomorrow Stefanuta proposes some
    sort of committee or ensures there will be a public hearing on the
    topic. But -and maybe I'm just too cynical- at this point it just
    looks like an easy way to get his name in the press rather than any
    real show of support.




    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From JAB@noway@nochance.com to comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action on Wed Jul 16 19:35:33 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action

    On 16/07/2025 19:24, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
    On Wed, 16 Jul 2025 08:22:35 +0100, JAB <noway@nochance.com> wrote:

    Well this is more than I thought would happen. One of the vice
    presidents of the EU has come out in support of the initiative. Where
    it's goes from here is anybody's guess. Something I also noticed,
    Videogames Europe is based in Brussels, now I can't imagine why they
    choose that location. Maybe they really like Belgian fries with mayo?

    https://www.eurogamer.net/as-stop-killing-games-momentum-continues-top-eu-politician-offers-support-a-game-once-sold-belongs-to-the-customer

    To be clear, though, all Stefanuta (the politician in question) was
    did was say is (paraphrased), "yeah, this a good idea," and he signed
    the non-binding "Stop Killing Games" petition. He hasn't actually
    pushed forward any initiatives that would support it. And, coming from Romania, I'm not sure how much influence he'd have anyway. At this
    point, he's just one more name on the petition and (with apologies to
    our Romanian neighbors) little more important than if, say, Tom Hanks
    signed his name to the list. Buzzworthy, but not really moving us
    forward.

    I'll happily eat my hat, though, if tomorrow Stefanuta proposes some
    sort of committee or ensures there will be a public hearing on the
    topic. But -and maybe I'm just too cynical- at this point it just
    looks like an easy way to get his name in the press rather than any
    real show of support.


    He's one of the vice presidents of the *EU* so does have somewhat of a
    say in what happens and certainly rather more than Tom Hanks support
    would. He also has a history of talking about digital rights for consumers.

    To put it simply, it's people like him who if the petition get's the authorised number of signatures can try and push people in the EU to
    move it forward and be considered.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Xocyll@Xocyll@gmx.com to comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action on Thu Jul 17 15:14:41 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action

    JAB <noway@nochance.com> looked up from reading the entrails of the porn spammer to utter "The Augury is good, the signs say:

    Well this is more than I thought would happen. One of the vice
    presidents of the EU has come out in support of the initiative. Where
    it's goes from here is anybody's guess. Something I also noticed,
    Videogames Europe is based in Brussels, now I can't imagine why they
    choose that location. Maybe they really like Belgian fries with mayo?

    Isn't Brussels the home base of the EU gov't?

    As such expect this to be bogged down by legalese and take the better
    part of a decade to start to get off the ground.

    Xocyll
    --
    I don't particularly want you to FOAD, myself. You'll be more of
    a cautionary example if you'll FO And Get Chronically, Incurably,
    Painfully, Progressively, Expensively, Debilitatingly Ill. So
    FOAGCIPPEDI. -- Mike Andrews responding to an idiot in asr
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From JAB@noway@nochance.com to comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action on Fri Jul 18 09:23:49 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action

    On 17/07/2025 20:14, Xocyll wrote:
    JAB <noway@nochance.com> looked up from reading the entrails of the porn spammer to utter "The Augury is good, the signs say:

    Well this is more than I thought would happen. One of the vice
    presidents of the EU has come out in support of the initiative. Where
    it's goes from here is anybody's guess. Something I also noticed,
    Videogames Europe is based in Brussels, now I can't imagine why they
    choose that location. Maybe they really like Belgian fries with mayo?

    Isn't Brussels the home base of the EU gov't?

    Well quite, that was the point. It's a lobbying group for the games
    industry in Europe, where else would they place it.

    As such expect this to be bogged down by legalese and take the better
    part of a decade to start to get off the ground.

    The initiative is designed to get the ball rolling on changing consumer
    law not what the law says at the moment. Where the time will go, if it
    evens happens, is all member states will want to have their say on the
    matter. The positive though, no country will be allowed a veto.

    I'm still not optimistic that something will happen but I am more
    optimistic than I was before.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2