• =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=9CBackblaze_Drive_Stats_for_Q2_2025=E2=80=9D?=

    From Lynn McGuire@lynnmcguire5@gmail.com to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt on Tue Aug 5 22:21:32 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage

    “Backblaze Drive Stats for Q2 2025”
    https://www.backblaze.com/blog/backblaze-drive-stats-for-q2-2025/

    Buy WD drives for now.

    QLC drives are coming. Less heat, less electricity, less space, way
    longer life, and sizes in the hundreds of TB real soon now for the same
    cost as spinning rust.

    Lynn

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mr. Man-wai Chang@toylet.toylet@gmail.com to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt on Wed Aug 6 12:08:27 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage

    On 6/8/2025 11:21 am, Lynn McGuire wrote:
    “Backblaze Drive Stats for Q2 2025”
    https://www.backblaze.com/blog/backblaze-drive-stats-for-q2-2025/

    Buy WD drives for now.

    QLC drives are coming. Less heat, less electricity, less space, way
    longer life, and sizes in the hundreds of TB real soon now for the same
    cost as spinning rust.

    You are mixing HDD and SSD in one single message. Better split it into 2 threads. :)

    According to some, QLC has shorter lifespan than TLC and even less than
    SLC, though we cannot find SLC drives now.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2