From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

On 2025-07-30 00:46, Marion wrote:

On Sun, 27 Jul 2025 09:39:18 +1200, Your Name wrote :

And for the tiny minority that do need extra storage space, they can
easily just plug in and use normal USB-C keyring drives or bigger
capacity portable SSDs or hard drives.

I study Apple. And I study you.

LOLOLOLLOLOLOL!

That's just TOO FUNNY!
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

On 2025-07-30, Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 05:18:23 +1000, Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:

iPhones can run an SMB server with thedefault privileged port, among
other things.

So can android

Wrong.
--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote

Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote

Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote

iPhones can run an SMB server with the
default privileged port, among other things.

So can android

Wrong.

Nope, dope
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 21:21:07 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote :

In fact, we have a thread already on that topic where NOBODY could find a
single thing that the iPhone does that Android doesn't already do, Chris.

Your memory is failing you or your denialism is such that reality is a foreign country. You yourself admitted there was something an iphone could
do that an android phone couldn't.

I'll leave it for you to remember. It was only a few weeks ago.

Well, Jolly Roger brought it up just now, so I will agree I was wrong.

There is one thing unjailbroken iOS can do that Android cannot do.

Unjailbroken iOS can access ports below 1024 for servers, such as for SMB. Hence I fully agree there is this 1 thing iOS can do that Android can't do. --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

On 30 Jul 2025 19:18:23 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote :

iPhones can run an SMB server with the default
privileged port, among other things. And that has absolutely nothing to
do with filling Apple's pockets.

Ah, yes. Thanks for jogging my memory. I've been trying to teach folks that there's nothing iOS can do that Android can't that I forgot about ports!

You're right!
I was wrong.

I will agree with anyone who makes a logically sensible statement.
Jolly Roger is correct. I was wrong. I apologize.

There is one thing an unjailbroken iOS device can do that Android can't.

It's true that unjailbroken iOS can access ports below 1024 for servers.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

Marion <marion@facts.com> wrote:

On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 21:21:07 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote :

In fact, we have a thread already on that topic where NOBODY could find a >>> single thing that the iPhone does that Android doesn't already do, Chris. >>

Your memory is failing you or your denialism is such that reality is a
foreign country. You yourself admitted there was something an iphone could >> do that an android phone couldn't.

I'll leave it for you to remember. It was only a few weeks ago.

Well, Jolly Roger brought it up just now, so I will agree I was wrong.

There is one thing unjailbroken iOS can do that Android cannot do.

Unjailbroken iOS can access ports below 1024 for servers, such as for SMB. Hence I fully agree there is this 1 thing iOS can do that Android can't do.

There are others...

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

On 2025-08-01, Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote

Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote

Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote

iPhones can run an SMB server with the default privileged port,
among other things.

So can android

Wrong.

Nope, dope

You're an idiot. We've already discussed the FACT that Android cannot
run an SMB server on the default port at length here, while iOS can.
Marion (Arlen) claimed otherwise and was shown to be WRONG. And here you
come weeks later trying to claim it can. You're a clown, Robbie. 🤣
--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

On 2025-08-01, Marion <marion@facts.com> wrote:

On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 21:21:07 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote :

In fact, we have a thread already on that topic where NOBODY could find a >>> single thing that the iPhone does that Android doesn't already do, Chris. >>

Your memory is failing you or your denialism is such that reality is a
foreign country. You yourself admitted there was something an iphone could >> do that an android phone couldn't.

I'll leave it for you to remember. It was only a few weeks ago.

Well, Jolly Roger brought it up just now, so I will agree I was wrong.

You're almost always wrong when it comes to Apple.

So is Robbie.
--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

On 2025-08-01, Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:

Marion <marion@facts.com> wrote:

On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 21:21:07 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote :

In fact, we have a thread already on that topic where NOBODY could find a >>>> single thing that the iPhone does that Android doesn't already do, Chris. >>>

Your memory is failing you or your denialism is such that reality is a
foreign country. You yourself admitted there was something an iphone could >>> do that an android phone couldn't.

I'll leave it for you to remember. It was only a few weeks ago.

Well, Jolly Roger brought it up just now, so I will agree I was wrong.

There is one thing unjailbroken iOS can do that Android cannot do.

Unjailbroken iOS can access ports below 1024 for servers, such as for SMB. >> Hence I fully agree there is this 1 thing iOS can do that Android can't do.

There are others...

Of course there are. But trolls gotta troll.
--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

On 2025-08-01, Marion <marion@facts.com> wrote:

On 30 Jul 2025 19:18:23 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote :

privileged port, among other things. And that has absolutely nothing
to do with filling Apple's pockets.

Ah, yes. Thanks for jogging my memory. I've been trying to teach folks
that there's nothing iOS can do that Android can't that I forgot about
ports!

You lost your memory that fast, eh? 🤣

No worries, little Arlen. Pepperidge Farm always remembers. This isn't
the first time you've been caught lying about Apple products, and it
certainly won't be the last.
--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote

Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote

Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote

Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote

Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote

iPhones can run an SMB server with the default privileged port,
among other things.

So can android

Wrong.

Nope, dope

You're an idiot.

We'll see who the idiot is...

We've already discussed the FACT that Android cannot runan SMB server > on the default port at length here, while iOS can.

There was no discussion, just your stupid claim.
There isnt just one android either

Marion (Arlen) claimed otherwise and was shown to be WRONG.

Nope, claimed to be wrong, actially

And here you come weeks later tryingto claim it can. You're a clown, > Robbie. 🤣

You have always been a terminal fuckwit, Rojjy
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

On 2025-08-01 08:28, Rod Speed wrote:

Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote

Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote

Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote

Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote

Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote

iPhones can run an SMB server with the default  privileged port,
among  other things.

So can android

Wrong.

Nope, dope

You're an idiot.

We'll see who the idiot is...

We've already discussed the FACT that Android cannot  runan SMB server
on the default port at length here, while iOS can.

There was no discussion, just your stupid claim.

A claim which was confirmed by numerous posters including myself.

There isnt just one android either

Name one.

Marion (Arlen) claimed otherwise and was shown to be WRONG.

Nope, claimed to be wrong, actially

Shown to be wrong.

I can post the screenshots again if you like.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

On 2025-08-01, Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote

Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote

Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote

Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote

Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote

iPhones can run an SMB server with the default privileged port,
among other things.

So can android

Wrong.

Nope, dope

You're an idiot.

We'll see who the idiot is...

Too late, little Robbie. It's already crystal clear to anyone who knows
about this topic that you are the idiot here. Even trollboi Marion
(Arlen) admits Android can't do this. Stay dumb, loser. 🤣
--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

On Sat, 02 Aug 2025 01:49:25 +1000, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2025-08-01 08:28, Rod Speed wrote:

Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote

Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote

Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote

Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote

Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote

iPhones can run an SMB server with the default privileged port, >>>>>>> among other things.

So can android

Wrong.

Nope, dope

You're an idiot.

We'll see who the idiot is...

We've already discussed the FACT that Android cannot runan SMB server >>> on the default port at length here, while iOS can.

There was no discussion, just your stupid claim.

A claim which was confirmed by numerous posters including myself.

Which stupidly ignores the fact that there isnt just one android

There isnt just one android either

Name one.

Marion (Arlen) claimed otherwise and was shown to be WRONG.

Nope, claimed to be wrong, actially

Shown to be wrong.

Only with one android

I can post the screenshots again if you like.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

On Sat, 02 Aug 2025 02:32:27 +1000, Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:

On 2025-08-01, Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote

Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote

Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote

Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote

Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote

iPhones can run an SMB server with the default privileged port,>>>>>>> among other things.

So can android

Wrong.

Nope, dope

You're an idiot.

We'll see who the idiot is...

Too late, little Robbie.

Nope, idiot Rojjy

It's already crystal clear to anyone who knows
about this topic that you are the idiot here. Even trollboi Marion
(Arlen) admits Android can't do this. Stay dumb, loser. 🤣

There isnt just one android, fuckwit
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

On 2025-08-01 16:05, Rod Speed wrote:

On Sat, 02 Aug 2025 01:49:25 +1000, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2025-08-01 08:28, Rod Speed wrote:

Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote

Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote

Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote

Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote

Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote

iPhones can run an SMB server with the default  privileged port, >>>>>>>> among  other things.

So can android

Wrong.

Nope, dope

You're an idiot.

 We'll see who the idiot is...

We've already discussed the FACT that Android cannot  runan SMB
server on the default port at length here, while iOS can.

 There was no discussion, just your stupid claim.

A claim which was confirmed by numerous posters including myself.

Which stupidly ignores the fact that there isnt just one android

Great.

Show one that can do it.

 There isnt just one android either

Name one.

Marion (Arlen) claimed otherwise and was shown to be WRONG.

 Nope, claimed to be wrong, actially

Shown to be wrong.

Only with one android

Prove it.

I can post the screenshots again if you like.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

On 2025-08-01 16:07, Rod Speed wrote:

On Sat, 02 Aug 2025 02:32:27 +1000, Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:

On 2025-08-01, Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote

Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote

Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote

Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote

Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote

iPhones can run an SMB server with the default  privileged port, >>>>>>>> among other things.

So can android

Wrong.

Nope, dope

You're an idiot.

We'll see who the idiot is...

Too late, little Robbie.

Nope, idiot Rojjy

It's already crystal clear to anyone who knows
about this topic that you are the idiot here. Even trollboi Marion
(Arlen) admits Android can't do this. Stay dumb, loser. 🤣

There isnt just one android, fuckwit

But you'll never actually show one that can do it...

...right?
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

On 1 Aug 2025 15:19:35 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote :

Well, Jolly Roger brought it up just now, so I will agree I was wrong.

You're almost always wrong when it comes to Apple.

Never think I'm anything like you Jolly Roger, as that is a mistake.
I never would mind admitting when I'm wrong - because I'm an actual adult.

My value added is that everyone can trust what I say is correct.
And part of that trust is openly admitting when I'm wrong - which I did.

You Apple trolls are nothing like me in that your ego doesn't allow that.
Your ego is fragile because you've been told you're stupid your whole life.

So don't ever make the mistake of assuming I'm anything like you trolls.

As I said, there is one thing iOS can do that Android cannot do.
And that is access ports below 1024 for servers such as for SMB.

However...

I can't name a single other thing though that iOS does that Android can't.
Can you?
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

On Fri, 1 Aug 2025 06:39:04 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote :

Unjailbroken iOS can access ports below 1024 for servers, such as for SMB. >> Hence I fully agree there is this 1 thing iOS can do that Android can't do.

There are others...

Name it and we'll discuss it, which is what adults do on adult newsgroups.

If you think there's another functionality other than servers on privileged ports that you feel iOS can do that Android can't do, just name it.

Note that we're not talking about brand names but actual functionality.

For example,nospam would tout AirDrop as a unique Apple feature for fast,
local file sharing but Android has had a similar feature for years called Nearby Share (now evolving into Quick Share in collaboration with Samsung
and Google).

Yet many iPhone users still believe Android lacks this capability because
Apple branded it so effectively and Android's version wasn't as heavily marketed.

So name a functionality (not a brand name) you feel iOS can do that Android can't.

Once you realize they won't exist, then you're ready to learn why.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

On 2025-08-01, Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

On Sat, 02 Aug 2025 02:32:27 +1000, Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:

On 2025-08-01, Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote

Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote

Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote

Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote

Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote

iPhones can run an SMB server with the default privileged port, >>>>>>>> among other things.

So can android

Wrong.

Nope, dope

You're an idiot.

We'll see who the idiot is...

Too late, little Robbie.

Nope, idiot Rojjy

It's already crystal clear to anyone who knows
about this topic that you are the idiot here. Even trollboi Marion
(Arlen) admits Android can't do this. Stay dumb, loser. 🤣

There isnt just one android, fuckwit

Then it should be easy for you to back up your claim with evidence, dip
shit roo fucker.
--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

On 2025-08-02, Marion <marion@facts.com> wrote:

On 1 Aug 2025 15:19:35 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote :

Well, Jolly Roger brought it up just now, so I will agree I was
wrong.

You're almost always wrong when it comes to Apple.

I never would mind admitting when I'm wrong

Says the troll who repeatedly claimed it was impossible for iPhones to
run SMB servers on default ports *long* after you were shown that's not
the case - as you *always* do. Pretend all you want, but Pepperidge Farm remembers. 🤣

I'm an actual adult.

You're a man child troll who spends his every waking moment trolling
newsgroups for products you hold a seething hatred for.
--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

On 2025-08-02, Marion <marion@facts.com> wrote:

On Fri, 1 Aug 2025 06:39:04 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote :

Unjailbroken iOS can access ports below 1024 for servers, such as
for SMB. Hence I fully agree there is this 1 thing iOS can do that
Android can't do.

There are others...

Name it and I'll deny it and move the goal post around until you get
tired of dealing with my bullshit and I declare "victory".

FTFY
--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:

On 2025-08-02, Marion <marion@facts.com> wrote:

On Fri, 1 Aug 2025 06:39:04 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote :

Unjailbroken iOS can access ports below 1024 for servers, such as
for SMB. Hence I fully agree there is this 1 thing iOS can do that
Android can't do.

There are others...

Name it and I'll deny it and move the goal post around until you get
tired of dealing with my bullshit and I declare "victory".

FTFY

Accurate.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

On 2 Aug 2025 02:28:34 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote :

As I said, there is one thing iOS can do that Android cannot do.
And that is access ports below 1024 for servers such as for SMB.
However...
I can't name a single other thing though that iOS does that Android can't. >> Can you?

You're a man child troll who spends his every waking moment trolling newsgroups for products you hold a seething hatred for.

The adults on this child-like Apple newsgroup will note that both Chris and Jolly Roger claimed there is something else iOS can do that Android can't.

Yet, the response from those child-like Apple trolls was rather revealing. Nonetheless, the question is apropos for this iPhone & Apple related ng.

Q: *What else do you feel iOS can do that Android doesn't already do?*
A: ?

Note: Once these Apple herd animals finally understand there's almost
nothing that iOS can do that Android hasn't done long ago, then, & only
then, they are ready to begin to understand Apple's strategy as to why.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

On Sat, 2 Aug 2025 08:02:57 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote :

Unjailbroken iOS can access ports below 1024 for servers, such as
for SMB. Hence I fully agree there is this 1 thing iOS can do that
Android can't do.

There are others...

Name it and I'll deny it and move the goal post around until you get
tired of dealing with my bullshit and I declare "victory".

FTFY

Accurate.

For the adult record, neither Chris nor Jolly Roger have come up with a
single item to back up their claim that "there are others" iOS can do.








Understanding why iOS is so astoundingly limited is a key step in adults understanding Apple's strategy of designing iOS devices as dumb terminals.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

Marion <marion@facts.com> wrote:

On Sat, 2 Aug 2025 08:02:57 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote :

Unjailbroken iOS can access ports below 1024 for servers, such as
for SMB. Hence I fully agree there is this 1 thing iOS can do that >>>>>> Android can't do.

There are others...

Name it and I'll deny it and move the goal post around until you get
tired of dealing with my bullshit and I declare "victory".

FTFY

Accurate.

For the adult record, neither Chris nor Jolly Roger have come up with a single item to back up their claim that "there are others" iOS can do.

FTR it is Arlen who famously makes unsubstantiated claims. Even when he's
been routinely corrected, he continues with the same claims for weeks and months and years.

True to form as described by JR Step 1 is denial.

Understanding why iOS is so astoundingly limited is a key step in adults understanding Apple's strategy of designing iOS devices as dumb terminals.

Step 2 - moving goal posts: Check!



--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

On 2025-08-03, Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:

Marion <marion@facts.com> wrote:

On Sat, 2 Aug 2025 08:02:57 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote :

Unjailbroken iOS can access ports below 1024 for servers, such
as for SMB. Hence I fully agree there is this 1 thing iOS can
do that Android can't do.

There are others...

Name it and I'll deny it and move the goal post around until you
get tired of dealing with my bullshit and I declare "victory".

FTFY

Accurate.

For the adult record, neither Chris nor Jolly Roger have come up with
a single item to back up their claim that "there are others" iOS can
do.

FTR it is Arlen who famously makes unsubstantiated claims. Even when
he's been routinely corrected, he continues with the same claims for
weeks and months and years.

True to form as described by JR Step 1 is denial.

And his pathology is on display here 24/7 for anyone to see for
themselves. It's no big secret how he operates. The guy is sick.
--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

On 4 Aug 2025 00:05:04 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote :

For the adult record, neither Chris nor Jolly Roger have come up with
a single item to back up their claim that "there are others" iOS can
do.

FTR it is Arlen who famously makes unsubstantiated claims. Even when
he's been routinely corrected, he continues with the same claims for
weeks and months and years.

True to form as described by JR Step 1 is denial.

And his pathology is on display here 24/7 for anyone to see for
themselves. It's no big secret how he operates. The guy is sick.

Heh heh heh...

The Apple trolls are deathly *afraid* of what amounts to a simple query:

From: Marion <marion@facts.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Is there really only one thing that iOS can do
that Android can't do?
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2025 17:37:54 -0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <106lidi$6h7$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>

In previous threads, I've proven by my own detailed testing, that there
is at least one thing non-jailbroken iOS can do which unrooted Android
can't.

But... is there anything else?


Once you know the answer to that question, you know a lot about Apple's fundamental strategy of designing the iPhone as a crippled mobile device.

But until you can answer that question, you don't know anything at all.
Once you understand the answer, then I can begin to teach you why.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

On 2025-08-08 16:05, Marion wrote:

On 4 Aug 2025 00:05:04 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote :

For the adult record, neither Chris nor Jolly Roger have come up with
a single item to back up their claim that "there are others" iOS can
do.

FTR it is Arlen who famously makes unsubstantiated claims. Even when
he's been routinely corrected, he continues with the same claims for
weeks and months and years.

True to form as described by JR Step 1 is denial.

And his pathology is on display here 24/7 for anyone to see for
themselves. It's no big secret how he operates. The guy is sick.

Heh heh heh...

The Apple trolls are deathly*afraid* of what amounts to a simple query:

From: Marion<marion@facts.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Is there really only one thing that iOS can do
that Android can't do?
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2025 17:37:54 -0000 (UTC)
Message-ID:<106lidi$6h7$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>

In previous threads, I've proven by my own detailed testing, that there
is at least one thing non-jailbroken iOS can do which unrooted Android
can't.

By YOUR testing, Arlen?

LOL!

You denied it over and over after multiple people told you it worked!
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

On 2025-08-09, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2025-08-08 16:05, Marion wrote:

On 4 Aug 2025 00:05:04 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote :

For the adult record, neither Chris nor Jolly Roger have come up with >>>>> a single item to back up their claim that "there are others" iOS can >>>>> do.

FTR it is Arlen who famously makes unsubstantiated claims. Even when
he's been routinely corrected, he continues with the same claims for
weeks and months and years.

True to form as described by JR Step 1 is denial.

And his pathology is on display here 24/7 for anyone to see for
themselves. It's no big secret how he operates. The guy is sick.

Heh heh heh...

The Apple trolls are deathly*afraid* of what amounts to a simple query:

From: Marion<marion@facts.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Is there really only one thing that iOS can do
that Android can't do?
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2025 17:37:54 -0000 (UTC)
Message-ID:<106lidi$6h7$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>

In previous threads, I've proven by my own detailed testing, that there
is at least one thing non-jailbroken iOS can do which unrooted Android
can't.

By YOUR testing, Arlen?

LOL!

You denied it over and over after multiple people told you it worked!

And now he just pretends that never happened, right along with
brainrotdude. The fascinating thing is they actually believe if they lie
we'll all just magically forget about it as if it never happened. They
actually believe people are as fucking dumb as they are. It's pathetic behavior.
--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

On 10 Aug 2025 00:13:37 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote :

And now he just pretends that never happened, right along with
brainrotdude. The fascinating thing is they actually believe if they lie we'll all just magically forget about it as if it never happened. They actually believe people are as fucking dumb as they are. It's pathetic behavior.

Heh heh heh...

You Apple trolls *hate* that Apple sold you on a device that can't do much.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

On 2025-08-10 23:11, Marion wrote:

On 10 Aug 2025 00:13:37 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote :

And now he just pretends that never happened, right along with
brainrotdude. The fascinating thing is they actually believe if they lie
we'll all just magically forget about it as if it never happened. They
actually believe people are as fucking dumb as they are. It's pathetic
behavior.

Heh heh heh...

You Apple trolls *hate* that Apple sold you on a device that can't do much.

What exactly is it that my device "can't do"?
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2