From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in news:693787bf$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:

On Dec 8, 2025 at 6:28:27 PM MST, ""Roy S."" wrote <XnsB3AFD0465E55112345678@62.164.182.28>:

I was asked by David B to post the information I recieved via a FOI
request to the Arizona court clerk.

So being that one of the conditions of the court clerk emailing the
case information to me is that I will not share it either
electronically or physically.
I suspect the documents are watermarked so I'm not going down that
path.

So here is some information taken from the document from the court
which shows that snit did indeed have an order of protection filed
against him by his ex wife Anne Glasser.

1. A screenshot of part of the document.
Take note of the case number.

https://ibb.co/n8K2nSTm

Notice on one part it says "Criminal"

On another it says "DR" -- Domestic Relations. That is Civil.

While I do not see any obvious proof that other "screenshot" *COULD
NOT* be real (Carroll talked about using the Console to just modify a
real one at one point), this one is clearly and obviously faked.

Going to ignore most of this nonsense... but in this case it was
trivial to show the image is faked.

Thanks for proving my point.

LOL!
Proving your point?
Which one would that be?
Maybe where you denied that a government site was posted?
Remember that one Brock?

the post is not nonsense, it's just the tip of the iceberg regarding your criminal offenses against your ex wife, who BTW is a common-law wife.
Yes that shows up as well.
Oh and she is no angel either. That shows up too.

Like I said already, it's trivial for anyone to request court records regarding your criminal, and quite frankly flagrant disregard for the law.
Your lies and denials will not work this time Brock.
You are stone cold dead in de market. https://youtu.be/Xn72TyJkDS8?si=YPgI-itsT4mj9AUu

You cannot squirm your way out of this one Brock.
--
Roy Scheinberg.
To learn all about the snit Michael Glasser Troll
simply use a free trial to newshosting.com and you
can download all messages back to 2004.
Some late 2000's messages are mixed in there as well.
Instant database.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

On 09/12/2025 03:01, Roy S. wrote:

Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in news:693787bf$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:

On Dec 8, 2025 at 6:28:27 PM MST, ""Roy S."" wrote
<XnsB3AFD0465E55112345678@62.164.182.28>:

I was asked by David B to post the information I recieved via a FOI
request to the Arizona court clerk.

So being that one of the conditions of the court clerk emailing the
case information to me is that I will not share it either
electronically or physically.
I suspect the documents are watermarked so I'm not going down that
path.

So here is some information taken from the document from the court
which shows that snit did indeed have an order of protection filed
against him by his ex wife Anne Glasser.

1. A screenshot of part of the document.
Take note of the case number.

https://ibb.co/n8K2nSTm

Notice on one part it says "Criminal"

On another it says "DR" -- Domestic Relations. That is Civil.

While I do not see any obvious proof that other "screenshot" *COULD
NOT* be real (Carroll talked about using the Console to just modify a
real one at one point), this one is clearly and obviously faked.

Going to ignore most of this nonsense... but in this case it was
trivial to show the image is faked.

Thanks for proving my point.

LOL!
Proving your point?
Which one would that be?
Maybe where you denied that a government site was posted?
Remember that one Brock?

the post is not nonsense, it's just the tip of the iceberg regarding your criminal offenses against your ex wife, who BTW is a common-law wife.
Yes that shows up as well.
Oh and she is no angel either. That shows up too.

Like I said already, it's trivial for anyone to request court records regarding your criminal, and quite frankly flagrant disregard for the law. Your lies and denials will not work this time Brock.
You are stone cold dead in de market. https://youtu.be/Xn72TyJkDS8?si=YPgI-itsT4mj9AUu

You cannot squirm your way out of this one Brock.

Why are you telling folk a pack of lies, "Roy"?

Other folk can read your header information. You do KNOW that, eh?

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

"Roy S." <ukmanchU@uke.ork> news:XnsB3AFE0220500A12345678@62.164.182.25 Tue, 09 Dec 2025 03:01:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in news:693787bf$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:

On Dec 8, 2025 at 6:28:27 PM MST, ""Roy S."" wrote
<XnsB3AFD0465E55112345678@62.164.182.28>:

I was asked by David B to post the information I recieved via a FOI
request to the Arizona court clerk.

So being that one of the conditions of the court clerk emailing the
case information to me is that I will not share it either
electronically or physically.
I suspect the documents are watermarked so I'm not going down that
path.

So here is some information taken from the document from the court
which shows that snit did indeed have an order of protection filed
against him by his ex wife Anne Glasser.

1. A screenshot of part of the document.
Take note of the case number.

https://ibb.co/n8K2nSTm

Notice on one part it says "Criminal"

On another it says "DR" -- Domestic Relations. That is Civil.

While I do not see any obvious proof that other "screenshot" *COULD
NOT* be real (Carroll talked about using the Console to just modify a
real one at one point), this one is clearly and obviously faked.

Going to ignore most of this nonsense... but in this case it was
trivial to show the image is faked.

Thanks for proving my point.

LOL!
Proving your point?
Which one would that be?
Maybe where you denied that a government site was posted?
Remember that one Brock?

the post is not nonsense, it's just the tip of the iceberg regarding your criminal offenses against your ex wife, who BTW is a common-law wife.
Yes that shows up as well.
Oh and she is no angel either. That shows up too.

I've stated multiple times that she was a common law wife. Snit denied it. :)

I was right when I labeled her a grifter too, like him, wasn't I? LOL!!!

Like I said already, it's trivial for anyone to request court records regarding your criminal, and quite frankly flagrant disregard for the law. Your lies and denials will not work this time Brock.
You are stone cold dead in de market. https://youtu.be/Xn72TyJkDS8?si=YPgI-itsT4mj9AUu

You cannot squirm your way out of this one Brock.

LOL! As I suspected, snit opts to try the 'it's not real; it's all fake' routine.
--
Liar, lawyer; mirror show me, what's the difference?
Kangaroo done hung the guilty with the innocent
Liar, lawyer; mirror for ya', what's the difference?
Kangaroo be stoned. He's guilty as the government

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

"David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mpqi7tFbb9kU1@mid.individual.net Tue, 09 Dec 2025 12:15:57 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 09/12/2025 03:01, Roy S. wrote:

Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in
news:693787bf$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:

On Dec 8, 2025 at 6:28:27 PM MST, ""Roy S."" wrote
<XnsB3AFD0465E55112345678@62.164.182.28>:

I was asked by David B to post the information I recieved via a FOI
request to the Arizona court clerk.

So being that one of the conditions of the court clerk emailing the
case information to me is that I will not share it either
electronically or physically.
I suspect the documents are watermarked so I'm not going down that
path.

So here is some information taken from the document from the court
which shows that snit did indeed have an order of protection filed
against him by his ex wife Anne Glasser.

1. A screenshot of part of the document.
Take note of the case number.

https://ibb.co/n8K2nSTm

Notice on one part it says "Criminal"

On another it says "DR" -- Domestic Relations. That is Civil.

While I do not see any obvious proof that other "screenshot" *COULD
NOT* be real (Carroll talked about using the Console to just modify a
real one at one point), this one is clearly and obviously faked.

Going to ignore most of this nonsense... but in this case it was
trivial to show the image is faked.

Thanks for proving my point.

LOL!
Proving your point?
Which one would that be?
Maybe where you denied that a government site was posted?
Remember that one Brock?

the post is not nonsense, it's just the tip of the iceberg regarding your
criminal offenses against your ex wife, who BTW is a common-law wife.
Yes that shows up as well.
Oh and she is no angel either. That shows up too.

Like I said already, it's trivial for anyone to request court records
regarding your criminal, and quite frankly flagrant disregard for the law. >> Your lies and denials will not work this time Brock.
You are stone cold dead in de market.
https://youtu.be/Xn72TyJkDS8?si=YPgI-itsT4mj9AUu

You cannot squirm your way out of this one Brock.

Why are you telling folk a pack of lies, "Roy"?

Other folk can read your header information. You do KNOW that, eh?

David the dumbass, you do realize people can verify what he shared is true don't you? It doesn't take much effort. He practically provided step by step instructions. Face the facts, dishonest shitstain on the underwear of life - you can't help snit fix his reputation as a very well known lying, obnoxious troll, no matter how hard you try to lie and cover for him.

That's all you're doing here. You aren't helping Snit a bit by doing this.
You aren't helping the new comer establish any credibility here with this ruse, either, bro.

It's becoming very obvious as it does with others you've 'invited' here that you gave him your version of the lay of the land prior to his arrival. As I told him the other day/night? If it wasn't for two people I greatly respect vouching for him, I'd already consider him as yet another troll that you're responsible for bringing here.

So whats the end game with this one, anyhow? Is it really about tech discussions, or did you have something else in mind for him to be doing?
Keep in mind, he's already partially exposed...
--
Liar, lawyer; mirror show me, what's the difference?
Kangaroo done hung the guilty with the innocent
Liar, lawyer; mirror for ya', what's the difference?
Kangaroo be stoned. He's guilty as the government

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

On Dec 9, 2025 at 6:37:01 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote <XnsB3B0D1BA0AC1DHT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:

"David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mpqi7tFbb9kU1@mid.individual.net Tue, 09 Dec 2025 12:15:57 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 09/12/2025 03:01, Roy S. wrote:

Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in
news:693787bf$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:

On Dec 8, 2025 at 6:28:27 PM MST, ""Roy S."" wrote
<XnsB3AFD0465E55112345678@62.164.182.28>:

I was asked by David B to post the information I recieved via a FOI
request to the Arizona court clerk.

So being that one of the conditions of the court clerk emailing the
case information to me is that I will not share it either
electronically or physically.
I suspect the documents are watermarked so I'm not going down that
path.

So here is some information taken from the document from the court
which shows that snit did indeed have an order of protection filed
against him by his ex wife Anne Glasser.

1. A screenshot of part of the document.
Take note of the case number.

https://ibb.co/n8K2nSTm

Notice on one part it says "Criminal"

On another it says "DR" -- Domestic Relations. That is Civil.

While I do not see any obvious proof that other "screenshot" *COULD
NOT* be real (Carroll talked about using the Console to just modify a
real one at one point), this one is clearly and obviously faked.

Going to ignore most of this nonsense... but in this case it was
trivial to show the image is faked.

Thanks for proving my point.

LOL!
Proving your point?
Which one would that be?
Maybe where you denied that a government site was posted?
Remember that one Brock?

the post is not nonsense, it's just the tip of the iceberg regarding your >>> criminal offenses against your ex wife, who BTW is a common-law wife.
Yes that shows up as well.
Oh and she is no angel either. That shows up too.

Like I said already, it's trivial for anyone to request court records
regarding your criminal, and quite frankly flagrant disregard for the law. >>> Your lies and denials will not work this time Brock.
You are stone cold dead in de market.
https://youtu.be/Xn72TyJkDS8?si=YPgI-itsT4mj9AUu

You cannot squirm your way out of this one Brock.

Why are you telling folk a pack of lies, "Roy"?

Other folk can read your header information. You do KNOW that, eh?

David the dumbass, you do realize people can verify what he shared is true don't you? It doesn't take much effort. He practically provided step by step instructions. Face the facts, dishonest shitstain on the underwear of life - you can't help snit fix his reputation as a very well known lying, obnoxious troll, no matter how hard you try to lie and cover for him.

That's all you're doing here. You aren't helping Snit a bit by doing this. You aren't helping the new comer establish any credibility here with this ruse, either, bro.

It's becoming very obvious as it does with others you've 'invited' here that you gave him your version of the lay of the land prior to his arrival. As I told him the other day/night? If it wasn't for two people I greatly respect vouching for him, I'd already consider him as yet another troll that you're responsible for bringing here.

So whats the end game with this one, anyhow? Is it really about tech discussions, or did you have something else in mind for him to be doing?
Keep in mind, he's already partially exposed...

There is an effort to leave the nonsense in the past. Can you join us in being a part of the solution?
--
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

On 10/12/2025 01:36, Gremlin wrote:

"Roy S." <ukmanchU@uke.ork> news:XnsB3AFE0220500A12345678@62.164.182.25 Tue, 09 Dec 2025 03:01:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

LOL! As I suspected, snit opts to try the 'it's not real; it's all fake' routine.

I've been looking into this too. *The truth WILL out*!

Please comment, if you will, on this conclusion:-

https://i.ibb.co/RGrs1SFS/Screenshot-2025-12-10-at-13-00-58.png


The link they gave:

https://apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess/caselookup.aspx


*IS* a real Arizona Judicial Branch website.

But anyone can tell you “type this case number in” — and if a case does or doesn’t appear, they can spin a story.

The site itself does not confirm that the story told in the post is true
— it only verifies whether such a case number exists.

I was told the lookup and needed a VPN to appear in the USA.

That is already suspicious — the site normally works worldwide without a
VPN, or so I have been told elsewhere.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

On Dec 10, 2025 at 6:17:07 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote <mpta6kFpcadU1@mid.individual.net>:

On 10/12/2025 01:36, Gremlin wrote:

"Roy S." <ukmanchU@uke.ork> news:XnsB3AFE0220500A12345678@62.164.182.25 Tue, >> 09 Dec 2025 03:01:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

LOL! As I suspected, snit opts to try the 'it's not real; it's all fake'
routine.

I've been looking into this too. *The truth WILL out*!

Please comment, if you will, on this conclusion:-

https://i.ibb.co/RGrs1SFS/Screenshot-2025-12-10-at-13-00-58.png

Seems reasonable.

The link they gave:

https://apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess/caselookup.aspx

*IS* a real Arizona Judicial Branch website.

But anyone can tell you “type this case number in” — and if a case does or doesn’t appear, they can spin a story.

The site itself does not confirm that the story told in the post is true
— it only verifies whether such a case number exists.

Wait? It does? What is the case?

I was told the lookup and needed a VPN to appear in the USA.

That is already suspicious — the site normally works worldwide without a VPN, or so I have been told elsewhere.

It is odd that it would be location based.
--
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> news:6938d21b$4$21961$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com Wed, 10 Dec 2025
01:51:24 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On Dec 9, 2025 at 6:37:01 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote <XnsB3B0D1BA0AC1DHT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:

David the dumbass, you do realize people can verify what he shared is
true don't you? It doesn't take much effort. He practically provided
step by step instructions. Face the facts, dishonest shitstain on the
underwear of life - you can't help snit fix his reputation as a very
well known lying, obnoxious troll, no matter how hard you try to lie
and cover for him.

That's all you're doing here. You aren't helping Snit a bit by doing
this. You aren't helping the new comer establish any credibility here
with this ruse, either, bro.

It's becoming very obvious as it does with others you've 'invited' here
that you gave him your version of the lay of the land prior to his
arrival. As I told him the other day/night? If it wasn't for two people
I greatly respect vouching for him, I'd already consider him as yet
another troll that you're responsible for bringing here.

So whats the end game with this one, anyhow? Is it really about tech
discussions, or did you have something else in mind for him to be
doing? Keep in mind, he's already partially exposed...

There is an effort to leave the nonsense in the past. Can you join us in being a part of the solution?

That's the second time you've mentioned "us" - who is us specifically? IE:
who are you referring to when you make that statement? The so called
nonsense isn't nonsense though, Snit. It's lies and stories you've been
known to write. I for one cannot just ignore it, just give you a free pass. Which clearly is what you're expecting of myself and anyone else who isn't part of the "us" collective that you've referenced several times now.

If you were actually serious about the so called peace and starting fresh, You'd man up and apologize for the dishonest stories and accusations you've already made. You don't even admit you did anything wrong at this point. You axtually had the nerve to ask Nobody for MIDs showing that you lied. I recently shared your floodbot accusation along with the two line reply you wrote to me, where you accused me of writing a direct lie and lying about David having done as I wrote he did. I shared the interactions between the
two of you doing exactly what I wrote that he did. I also mentioned the generic as you could possibly write 'apology' you wrote to nobody specific that didn't apologize for anything you actually did. In that case, (1) claiming I wrote a direct lie and (2) denying that David did what I wrote he did by stating that he'd done no such thing. Two lines was your entire reply in that case and you lied with both of them! You also accused me of doing something I did not do. I didn't write a direct lie, I didn't even write an indirect one. I wrote no lies at all.

You know exactly why the court cases involving you aren't available via the website anymore. You also know that anyone who wants to take the time and
make the effort can directly contact the court house and provide the case #s to verify they do exist and are exactly as been shared before by several of us. Several of us visited that arizona.gov website when your court cases
were available on it.

It took you days to finally write the generic apology, taking no
responsbility for anything you did and not apologizing to a single person specifically; in that case, I would have been the only one you should have addressed it too; I was the one you stated had written a direct lie when I
did nothing of the sort.

SC didn't fake anything with the screen shots he took or the list of the issues you have had to attend court over previously. Most of them are
driving offenses due to lack of proper insurance. You seem to have a problem following the law when it comes to keeping a valid insurance policy on the vehicles youd drive.

I myself shared the list that was on the website and also included step by step instructions for those who wanted to fact check myself and others about them. I also took and shared screenshots. As did several others who saw it when it was freshly posted. You know that the website doesn't keep those things online forever, but the court case #s are still in existance and
those records can be requested by using them.

You stated that Roy was making things up and that he "forged" the evidence.
He did nothing of the sort, you openly lied about that and about him. You
are still lying about the driving offenses and the issues that took place between you and the common law wife you are no longer living with.

How do you expect any reasonable person to ignore every single thing you've done and "move forward in peace"? How can peace be achieved when you won't
own up to what you did and instead continue to claim those of us who write about it are the ones lying when we aren't? That doesn't make any sense to
me, and no doubt, others reading these threads.

Michael, you don't want to move forward in peace. You want all of us to give you a free pass for every single bullshit statement you've written. To completely disregard all of it. And for you not to apologize for any of it. That's not moving forward in peace. That's you not wanting to take any responsibilty for what you've written several times now. I see no reason to think that if your terms of moving forward in peace was actually taken seriously that you wouldn't just continue doing what you're very well known for. Lying your ass off.

I also wonder how you can want to move forward in peace when you claimed
that SC was a better coder than you when the truth is that neither of you
are coders AS you denied that I am and tried to claim my knowledge was marginal at best. All in the same paragraph. That again isn't moving forward in peace. That's you expecting conditions to be met which gives you a completely free pass for everything you did upto that point.

Disregarding all the lies you've written about several of us isn't a way to move forward in peace. If that actually was your goal and intention, you
would apologize for what you did. You'd do the right thing. Not double down
on your bullshit AS you try to mock me with this:


"And Carroll, at the very least, is clearly a better coder than I am. With my understanding of the human side and his understanding of coding and your understanding of some of the hardware level efficiency stuff (not sure how needed that would be, but still good to have), we could really do something pretty cool."

***

Nothing you've been writing so far indicates any desire to move forward in peace. It's terms you've concocted. You don't need to continue pretending
that you're a good dude. You've already reeled JPG in and he's followed what you write hook line and sinker. There's no further need to continue trying
to claim you're one of the good guys. He already mistakenly thinks you are.
So much so, he's willing to email you and David Brooks his musical interests because he thinks he'd be trolled by the 'bad guys' over them.

I concede that you have been able to 0wn him with relative ease. And, as I already wrote, had it not been for two people I greatly respect - I would
have already determined he's another troll for David Brooks purposes. When David invites people here, he's usually had a chance to brief them - to give them a jaded POV based on what he wants them to know. It's becoming more and more obvious with JPG. He won't be able to keep the ruse up much longer
before other regulars, if they even bother to interact with him - call him
out on it too.

David makes people look like fools with ease. He's been doing it for years.
He has zero credibility as a good guy but that hasn't stopped him from inviting people who don't know any better and blindly accept whatever he's already told them about some of us in advance.

You don't need to continue pretending that you're an honest joe who's being unfairly picked on at this point. YOu were able to do what you sought to do. If anything, you owe David Brooks a thank you for making the process as
simple for you.
--
Liar, lawyer; mirror show me, what's the difference?
Kangaroo done hung the guilty with the innocent
Liar, lawyer; mirror for ya', what's the difference?
Kangaroo be stoned. He's guilty as the government

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

On Dec 12, 2025 at 12:44:45 AM MST, "Gremlin" wrote <XnsB3B31BEF0E2B5HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:

Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> news:6938d21b$4$21961$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com Wed, 10 Dec 2025
01:51:24 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On Dec 9, 2025 at 6:37:01 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote
<XnsB3B0D1BA0AC1DHT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:

David the dumbass, you do realize people can verify what he shared is
true don't you? It doesn't take much effort. He practically provided
step by step instructions. Face the facts, dishonest shitstain on the
underwear of life - you can't help snit fix his reputation as a very
well known lying, obnoxious troll, no matter how hard you try to lie
and cover for him.

That's all you're doing here. You aren't helping Snit a bit by doing
this. You aren't helping the new comer establish any credibility here
with this ruse, either, bro.

It's becoming very obvious as it does with others you've 'invited' here
that you gave him your version of the lay of the land prior to his
arrival. As I told him the other day/night? If it wasn't for two people
I greatly respect vouching for him, I'd already consider him as yet
another troll that you're responsible for bringing here.

So whats the end game with this one, anyhow? Is it really about tech
discussions, or did you have something else in mind for him to be
doing? Keep in mind, he's already partially exposed...

There is an effort to leave the nonsense in the past. Can you join us in
being a part of the solution?

That's the second time you've mentioned "us" - who is us specifically?

Me. David. JPG. Mike Easter. To some extent even Apd. None of US want you to keep lying, trolling, doxxing, or pushing any of your lies and attacks. Nor do the others want me to keep replying... especially when you offer NOTHING new
in your insanity, just rehash it over and over again like a stuck record, and dishonesty pretending it has not been addressed MANY times.

You and Carroll (and some other trolls) do this. You do it for attention. You do it to get the focus on me and my life and to get people to dox me. You do
it to protect your own very delicate ego.

Please just stop.

If you do think you have a point, just make it. Not with a 5 page babbling, rambling bit of nonsense where you insist there is some lie buried if someone can only find it for you, but give a quote and MID. No need for headers and pages of irrelevant stuff. When I see that I tune you out. And something that has NOT been rehashed many times.

Move on from your petty squabbles. Stop throwing tantrums.

And I need to learn you won't do this and to stop asking. You have no desire
to have a conversation in good faith. You have no desire to stop lying and attacking. You make that clear.
--
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

On 12/12/2025 07:44, Gremlin (aka Dustin J. Cook)

David makes people look like fools with ease. He's been doing it for years. He has zero credibility as a good guy but that hasn't stopped him from inviting people who don't know any better and blindly accept whatever he's already told them about some of us in advance.

I tell folk the truth Dustin Cook!

I can even show them! Here's your name "up in lights" as I've said before! https://i.ibb.co/sdnRtsq7/Dustin-Cook-name-in-lights-copy-edited.jpg

I also try my best to verify what other folk tell me. Example:-

https://i.ibb.co/DgTYvxkd/For-Dustin.jpg

You don't need to continue pretending that you're an honest joe who's being unfairly picked on at this point. YOu were able to do what you sought to do. If anything, you owe David Brooks a thank you for making the process as simple for you.

Brock McNuggets has been nothing but helpful to me on most of the
occasions when I've asked him for help.

I asked him to come to ACW specifically because he *WAS* being picked
upon in other Usenet groups.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

On 12/12/25 10:04 AM, David B. wrote:

On 12/12/2025 07:44, Gremlin (aka Dustin J. Cook)

David makes people look like fools with ease. He's been doing it for
years.
He has zero credibility as a good guy but that hasn't stopped him from
inviting people who don't know any better and blindly accept whatever
he's
already told them about some of us in advance.

I tell folk the truth Dustin Cook!

I can even show them! Here's your name "up in lights" as I've said before! https://i.ibb.co/sdnRtsq7/Dustin-Cook-name-in-lights-copy-edited.jpg

I also try my best to verify what other folk tell me. Example:-

https://i.ibb.co/DgTYvxkd/For-Dustin.jpg

You don't need to continue pretending that you're an honest joe who's
being
unfairly picked on at this point. YOu were able to do what you sought
to do.
If anything, you owe David Brooks a thank you for making the process as
simple for you.

Brock McNuggets has been nothing but helpful to me on most of the
occasions when I've asked him for help.

I asked him to come to ACW specifically because he *WAS* being picked
upon in other Usenet groups.

David, you strut around like you’re some sage of credibility, but
watching you try to act like a “good guy” is like watching a toddler
play chess—you don’t understand the board, you don’t understand the pieces, and yet you insist on lecturing everyone else. You’ve done
nothing but flail, point fingers, and hand out fake praise while Gremlin
has been doing the actual work, verifying facts, showing receipts, and
keeping names straight. But of course, in your world, someone showing
evidence is “being mean,” while your ego gets a free pass. Classic.

And Snit-please. His idea of helping is like a broken GPS: he shows up sometimes, acts like he's guiding people, and then vanishes the moment
it gets tricky. He's useless, you sidekick in incompetence, and somehow
still think that makes you heroic. Every “helpful” thing he does is just
a cameo in the chaos you contribute to.

Meanwhile, Gremlin is out here making things transparent, exposing the nonsense, and keeping everyone honest. You two? You’re a comedy duo no
one asked for: one puffing up his ego, the other fumbling around like a paperweight trying to look useful. Honestly, it’s impressive how consistently you both manage to make yourselves irrelevant while
claiming the moral high ground.


--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

"David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mq309jFo0v8U1@mid.individual.net Fri,
12 Dec 2025 17:04:51 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 12/12/2025 07:44, Gremlin (aka Dustin J. Cook)

David makes people look like fools with ease. He's been doing it for
years. He has zero credibility as a good guy but that hasn't stopped
him from inviting people who don't know any better and blindly accept
whatever he's already told them about some of us in advance.

I tell folk the truth Dustin Cook!

You do on occasion. You didn't tell me the truth via email at any point concerning those servers, or why you were actually contacting me in the
first place. You weren't really emailing me requesting support for
BugHunter. You were trying to recruit me to help you get even with those server admins.

I can even show them! Here's your name "up in lights" as I've said
before!
https://i.ibb.co/sdnRtsq7/Dustin-Cook-name-in-lights-copy-edited.jpg

Which has nothing to do with what I wrote, David. I don't even know why
you keep bringing that up? I've never denied that I worked for them. A few people incorrectly labeled me a liar at one point for stating that I did though. I appreciate you bitch slapping them on my behalf. :)

Snit can't take many more smacks to the face like that though. You're
going to wind up hurting the sensitive fellow. Have you bought him a new pocket sized teddybear yet? He could use a new one.

I also try my best to verify what other folk tell me. Example:-

https://i.ibb.co/DgTYvxkd/For-Dustin.jpg

Allow me to set you and Tony straight there, David. Again. You've brought
this up several times before. Marcin and Bruce were well aware of my
history. I made absolutely no effort to hide it. Marcin knew me a bit
before he founded the company - I assisted him in improving his
AboutBuster program. Tony shouldn't have passed along his opinion
concerning me based on the ignorance he displayed he had concerning me.

While i'm correcting you and Tony, I'll also disclose the fact that I was
cold recruited to come work for Malwarebytes. I didn't apply for a job
with them. I didn't even know one was available. Had I known then what I learned about the company and the primary people while working for them, I wouldn't have accepted the offer. The company would be a very good fit for
you and Snit though.

I've told you this multiple times before. Evidently, it's always an OLAS moment for you. Excessive alcohol abuse over the years tends to fuxor your memory .

You don't need to continue pretending that you're an honest joe who's
being unfairly picked on at this point. YOu were able to do what you
sought to do. If anything, you owe David Brooks a thank you for making
the process as simple for you.

Brock McNuggets has been nothing but helpful to me on most of the
occasions when I've asked him for help.

You clearly don't always try to verify anything then. When you asked him
to help you with my wallgreeter source code and I responded to you telling
you that he couldn't - he took such offense to my truthful reply that he fabricated a story about me having a copy of the floodbot. Either in
source or compiled form. He has doubled down on that fabricated story by morphing it into another lie - That I had insider knowledge of the bot.
When I told him I had no such knowledge, He claimed I was lying about
having insider knowledge and therefore was lying about that too.

He literally made up shit and added more shit on it to continue labeling
me as a liar when he's the one who actually is.

So, no, you don't try your best to verify what other folk tell you. You specifically ignore such things concerning Snit. On purpose. You tried to mislead me from the very first email when I hadn't done a damn thing to
you. I didn't even know you. You still do what you did then. Again, I
hadn't done a damn thing to you or anyone you know. There was no reason
for you to have done what you did. I'll always see you for what you
actually are - a piece of shit liar. You have a lot in common with Pcbutts
and Snit and you always will. You are their kind of person. You fit right
in with them. Ironically, you seem to be very proud of the reputation you
have along with theirs.

I asked him to come to ACW specifically because he *WAS* being picked
upon in other Usenet groups.

After much wasted time interacting with him, I do not believe he was being picked on. He was most likely doing what he does here and enough posters
from whatever newsgroup you're writing about had enough and rightfully
took him to school for it.

Stop trying to rebrand him. Stop trying to lie and cover for him. It's a stupid thing to be doing. You can't make him anything he isn't. You can't
fool that many people into thinking that he's a victim of any kind. His
very well known track record of being a piece of shit dishonest troll is
well known. You can't fix that for him. He doesn't want you to anyhow.
--
Liar, lawyer; mirror show me, what's the difference?
Kangaroo done hung the guilty with the innocent
Liar, lawyer; mirror for ya', what's the difference?
Kangaroo be stoned. He's guilty as the government

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

On 13/12/2025 20:35, Gremlin wrote:

You weren't really emailing me requesting support for
BugHunter.

When did I EVER claim I wanted help with BugHunter?

You were trying to recruit me to help you get even with those
server admins.

Not so. You NEVER listen.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

On Dec 13, 2025 at 3:44:59 PM MST, ""David B."" wrote <mq68jbFa4d9U1@mid.individual.net>:

On 13/12/2025 20:35, Gremlin wrote:

You weren't really emailing me requesting support for
BugHunter.

When did I EVER claim I wanted help with BugHunter?

You were trying to recruit me to help you get even with those
server admins.

Not so. You NEVER listen.

Gremlin is not doing well. Something is stuck in his head... multiple things. Things which are not true.

* He denies my AIM chat bot code is mine. But it is. No reason to think otherwise and plenty of reason to think it is (who else would use AppleScript for such a purpose, LOL!)
* He denied numbers show up in call logs. They do.
* He insists bizarre things like discounts at shops in MY area (WTF?1?!?)
* He thinks quoting him is somehow "lying".
* He insists my business had no license.
* He insists he should not apologize even for doxxing complete strangers.

Just insanity... and worse he keeps repeating these things. He cannot move on.

I warned him how Carroll would chew him up and spit him out... and we are seeing the proof -- again -- of how I was right.

I wish he could pull himself out from under Carroll's thumb and be his own
man. And do as he said he wanted and move forward in peace. You have known him longer than I have -- did he used to be this "stuck" and unable to move
forward from his own delusions?
--
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2