• Re: bouncing phone

    From Marion@marion@facts.com to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.system on Sat Apr 5 18:32:16 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.system

    On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 18:06:12 -0000 (UTC), badgolferman wrote :


    What you describe is true for political affiliation as well.
    We are all herd animals to some extent, but the polarization has become extreme today. Even for mobile phones.

    Yes. And no.

    The yes is that marketing works. Propaganda works. Political bias works.
    The no is that some people are intelligent enough to rise above all that.

    An example is I buy Apple products - but I don't fall for the marketing. Another example is I listen to Democrats & Republicans but I am neither.

    Both are inconsistent - which logically intelligence people can see.

    An inconsistent example of Apple marketing, for example is:
    a. Apple "says" it's safe & secure & private
    b. But yet, it's the most exploited phone out there, less secure & private.
    c. Hence, Apple lied. So their marketing doesn't work on me. Right?

    An inconsistent example of Democrat political propaganda, for example is:
    a. Democrats "say" they're for choice on abortion & no choice on guns
    b. But yet, the choice is to kill a child & they take away choice on guns
    c. Hence, Democrats lied. So their propaganda doesn't work on me. Right?

    An inconsistent example of Republican political propaganda, for example is:
    a. Republicans "say" they're for religion & guns
    b. But yet, the choice is to save a child & yet allow guns to kill.
    c. Hence, Republicans lied. So their propaganda doesn't work on me. Right?

    These are vastly oversimplified of course.
    So don't take them as complete arguments.

    They're simply examples of where people who 'parrot' the Apple marketing,
    just as people who 'parrot' the political propaganda, are herd animals.

    They don't think for themselves.
    They are herd animals because it's a protective mechanism.

    Animals with no claws become herd animals as protective compensation.

    Apple trolls have no ability of independent thought - so they became herd animals as a protective mechanism against all threats to the Apple herd.

    People like you and I, who own independent thought processes, are a dire
    threat to the Apple trolls - which is why they lash out at us all the time.

    They're afraid of people who can think for themselves.
    --- Synchronet 3.20c-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Marion@marion@facts.com to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.system,comp.sys.mac.apps on Sun Apr 6 05:40:09 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.system

    On Sun, 6 Apr 2025 02:57:53 -0000 (UTC), badgolferman wrote :


    Now everyone can plainly see what kind of a person you are.

    What you're learning is the Apple trolls are truly unprepossessing people.
    They are basically herd animals, devoid of purposefully helpful intent.

    They have no heart.
    No soul.

    They're sadistic inhuman animals.
    Devoid of any semblance of basic humanity.

    Like nospam & Jolly Roger, Alan Baker is a cruel malcontent inhuman animal whose only amusement on Usenet is wasting your time and energy by
    constantly provoking responses from you, without offering any value ever.

    Just as with monstrous rapists and murderers, when Alan Baker is eventually dead and buried, the world will instantly be a better place for everyone.
    --- Synchronet 3.20c-Linux NewsLink 1.2